Background:
Visceral hypersensitivity plays a major role in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome, as shown by balloon distension studies. 5‐HT3 receptors on afferent nerves may modulate visceral sensitivity and be the target of new treatments for irritable bowel syndrome.
Aim:
To evaluate the effects of alosetron, a potent and selective 5‐HT3 antagonist, on the perception of colonic distension by patients with irritable bowel syndrome, and on the colonic compliance to distension with a barostat.
Methods:
Twenty‐five irritable bowel syndrome patients were included in a randomized double‐blind parallel group trial; data were available for 22 (Rome criteria; 48 ± 11 years; 13 men and nine women). Patients were treated for 7 days with placebo (n = 6), alosetron 0.25 mg b.d. (n = 8) or alosetron 4 mg b.d. (n = 8). On day 6, a barostat bag was placed in the left colon. On day 7, after an overnight fast, isobaric phasic distensions were performed (4 mmHg steps, 5 min) up to the step triggering a sensation of abdominal pain.
Results:
Groups were comparable at inclusion (age, sex, symptoms, bowel habits). There were no differences between treatment groups in pressure recorded within the bag at the time of first sensation of abdominal pain. However, bag volumes were significantly increased. At the first sensation threshold, median volume differences of 61 mL and 90 mL (P = 0.028) were recorded with alosetron 0.25 mg b.d. and 4 mg b.d., respectively. At the threshold of abdominal pain, these differences were 71 mL (P = 0.039) and 84 mL (P = 0.017). Colonic compliance increased from 5.9 mL/mmHg on placebo to 7.6 mL/mmHg on alosetron 0.25 mg b.d. and to 9.8 mL/mmHg (P = 0.034) on alosetron 4 mg b.d.
Conclusion:
Alosetron increases the compliance of the colon to distension, and could thereby contribute to changes in perception of colonic distension and improvement in the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome.
Switching to Trizivir offers a potent and simplified regimen with equivalent efficacy and significant improvement in lipid abnormalities compared to continued triple therapy.
The BACS appears to be a feasible and informative cognitive assessment tool for elderly patients with bipolar disorder. We believe that these preliminary results merit further investigation.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a triple nucleoside combination to a protease inhibitor-containing triple regimen as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-1-infected patients. Design Open-label study in HIV-1-infected ART-naive adults, randomized to receive either Combivir® (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg twice daily) + abacavir (300 mg twice daily), or Combivir® + nelfinavir (750 mg every 8 h) for 48 weeks. Plasma HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count and adverse events were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. Results 195 subjects (131 men, 64 women), median age 34 years, were randomized: 98 received combivir/abacavir and 97 combivir/nelfinavir. Baseline median plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.2 log10 copies/ml [Interquartile range (IQR): 3.7-4.5.2] and 4.1 log10 copies/ml (IQR: 3.8–4.6), respectively. Baseline median CD4 cell count was 387 cells/mm3 (IQR: 194–501) and 449 cells/mm3 (IQR: 334–605), respectively. Nine patients (3 vs 6, respectively) did not start treatment or did not have any available efficacy data. At week 48, using the intent to treat analysis (switch/missing equals failure), plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/ml in 54/95 (57%) and 53/91 (58%) of subjects, respectively. Median CD4 increase was +110 and +120 cells/mm3, respectively. Possible hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir were reported in four subjects (4%). Conclusion The triple nucleoside combination combivir/abacavir is well tolerated as a first-line ART regimen in HIV-1-infected adults, with comparable antiviral activity to a nelfinavir-containing regimen at week 48.
Safety and efficacy results from this study demonstrated that the quadruple regimen Combivir/abacavir/efavirenz is generally safe and displays potent and durable antiretroviral activity in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients, offering a promising therapeutic option in a PI-sparing strategy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.