Droughts are the most destructive catastrophes in the world. The persistence of drought is considered to cause many challenges for both humans and animals and ruins the ecosystem. These challenges have encouraged scientists to search for innovative methods and models that are effective for assessing and predicting drought events. The use of drought indices has been extensively employed in many regions across the globe and their effectiveness demonstrated. This review illustrates the effectiveness of drought indices in the assessment of droughts, with a focus on drought management and mitigation measures. Additionally, several ways of managing drought risk and proactive strategies that need to be implemented to mitigate droughts have been illustrated. In conclusion, this article suggests that drought mitigation should be done more naturally, in ways that strongly protect the environment rather than involve engineering projects which might cause the degradation of rivers and land, and damage the ecosystem.

Drought is a global issue with profound implications worldwide on biodiversity, equal safety, poverty eradication, sustainable development, and social-economic stability due to the significant role that water resources play in the growth of the world economy. Burundi is one of the highly vulnerable countries to the effects of climate change-related events because of its low adaptive capacity and high dependence on rainfed agriculture for livelihood. This research aimed to identify drought incidents and their characteristics in terms of duration, severity, and intensity and analysis of their trends in Burundi using the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). Monthly precipitation and temperature data of seven meteorological stations across Burundi (1981–2020) were obtained from Burundi Geographical Institute (IGEBU). The SPEI index of -2, -6 and -24 month timescales were generated to understand drought characteristics and the Mann–Kendall (MK) test combined with Sen’s slope estimator were utilized to analyze the drought trend based on the calculated SPEI values. The overall analysis of the computed SPEI time series demonstrated that drought is more frequent and severe in Burundi, especially in the northern and eastern parts. The results showed that the most prolonged and severe drought occurred during the 1990–2010 decades, and 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, and 2016 were extremely dry years. Proactive drought mitigation activities, climate change mitigation and water resources management policy are highly recommended in order to reduce drought risk and its effect on both population and the natural environment.

Droughts are natural catastrophes that cost the health and wealth of humans due to their harmful effects on the natural environment, ecology, hydrology, and agriculture in particular. Droughts are recurring incidents that last for prolonged periods of time in the northern part of Burundi. Despite the region being prone to drought and often suffering from dry conditions, drought has not been widely investigated. For the quantification and characterization of dryness conditions, this research utilized two drought indices, the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), at 2-, 6-, 24-, and 48-month timescales, where 2-, 6-, 24-, and 48-months correspond to agricultural and hydrological droughts, respectively. The two drought indices were compared, and the difference between SPEI and SPI was illustrated by quantifying and characterizing drought incidents. The findings revealed that different types of droughts threatened the northern part of Burundi during the periods of 1993–2000 and 2002–2009. Both indices illustrated that 2005, 2006, and 2007 were extremely dry years. The drought incidents detected by the SPEI index were classified into moderate and severe categories, characterized by long duration and greater magnitude. In contrast, the drought incidents detected by SPI were classified into the “extremely dry” category, characterized by limited duration and lower magnitude but with higher intensities. This research highlighted that SPEI differs from SPI in quantifying and characterizing droughts and highly suggests the use of both SPEI and SPI when assessing droughts. The outcome of this study will be useful in drought prevention and mitigation strategies across Burundi, specifically for agricultural purposes.