Oil bodies are sites of energy and carbon storage in many organisms including microalgae. As a step toward deciphering oil accumulation mechanisms in algae, we used proteomics to analyze purified oil bodies from the model microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii grown under nitrogen deprivation. Among the 248 proteins (≥ 2 peptides) identified by LC-MS/MS, 33 were putatively involved in the metabolism of lipids (mostly acyl-lipids and sterols). Compared with a recently reported Chlamydomonas oil body proteome, 19 new proteins of lipid metabolism were identified, spanning the key steps of the triacylglycerol synthesis pathway and including a glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT), a lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase (LPAT) and a putative phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT). In addition, proteins putatively involved in deacylation/reacylation, sterol synthesis, lipid signaling and lipid trafficking were found to be associated with the oil body fraction. This data set thus provides evidence that Chlamydomonas oil bodies are not only storage compartments but also are dynamic structures likely to be involved in processes such as oil synthesis, degradation and lipid homeostasis. The proteins identified here should provide useful targets for genetic studies aiming at increasing our understanding of triacyglycerol synthesis and the role of oil bodies in microalgal cell functions.
The structure of the respiratory nitrate reductase (NapAB) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the periplasmic heterodimeric enzyme responsible for the first step in the denitrification process, has been determined at a resolution of 3.2 A. The di-heme electron transfer small subunit NapB binds to the large subunit with heme II in close proximity to the [4Fe-4S] cluster of NapA. A total of 57 residues at the N- and C-terminal extremities of NapB adopt an extended conformation, embracing the NapA subunit and largely contributing to the total area of 5,900 A(2) buried in the complex. Complex formation was studied further by measuring the variation of the redox potentials of all the cofactors upon binding. The marked effects observed are interpreted in light of the three-dimensional structure and depict a plasticity that contributes to an efficient electron transfer in the complex from the heme I of NapB to the molybdenum catalytic site of NapA.
Phytochromes are chromoproteins found in plants and bacteria that switch between two photointerconvertible forms via the photoisomerization of their chromophore. These two forms, Pr and Pfr, absorb red and far-red light, respectively. We have characterized the biophysical and biochemical properties of two bacteriophytochromes, RpBphP2 and RpBphP3, from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Their genes are contiguous and localized near the pucBAd genes encoding the polypeptides of the light harvesting complexes LH4, whose synthesis depends on the light intensity. At variance with all (bacterio)phytochromes studied so far, the light-induced isomerization of the chromophore of RpBphP3 converts the Pr form to a form absorbing at shorter wavelength around 645 nm, designated as Pnr for near red. The quantum yield for the transformation of Pr into Pnr is about 6-fold smaller than for the reverse reaction. Both RpBphP2 and RpBphP3 autophosphorylate in their dark-adapted Pr forms and transfer their phosphate to a common response regulator Rpa3017. Under semiaerobic conditions, LH4 complexes replace specifically the LH2 complexes in wild-type cells illuminated by wavelengths comprised between 680 and 730 nm. In contrast, mutants deleted in each of these two bacteriophytochromes display no variation in the composition of their light harvesting complexes whatever the light intensity. From both the peculiar properties of these bacteriophytochromes and the phenotypes of their deletion mutants, we propose that they operate in tandem to control the synthesis of LH4 complexes by measuring the relative intensities of 645 and 710 nm lights.
To improve our understanding of uranium toxicity, the determinants of uranyl affinity in proteins must be better characterized. In this work, we analyzed the contribution of a phosphoryl group on uranium binding affinity in a protein binding site, using the site 1 EF-hand motif of calmodulin. The recombinant domain 1 of calmodulin from A. thaliana was engineered to impair metal binding at site 2 and was used as a structured template. Threonine at position 9 of the loop was phosphorylated in vitro, using the recombinant catalytic subunit of protein kinase CK2. Hence, the T9TKE12 sequence was substituted by the CK2 recognition sequence TAAE. A tyrosine was introduced at position 7, so that uranyl and calcium binding affinities could be determined by following tyrosine fluorescence. Phosphorylation was characterized by ESI-MS spectrometry, and the phosphorylated peptide was purified to homogeneity using ion-exchange chromatography. The binding constants for uranyl were determined by competition experiments with iminodiacetate. At pH 6, phosphorylation increased the affinity for uranyl by a factor of ∼5, from Kd = 25±6 nM to Kd = 5±1 nM. The phosphorylated peptide exhibited a much larger affinity at pH 7, with a dissociation constant in the subnanomolar range (Kd = 0.25±0.06 nM). FTIR analyses showed that the phosphothreonine side chain is partly protonated at pH 6, while it is fully deprotonated at pH 7. Moreover, formation of the uranyl-peptide complex at pH 7 resulted in significant frequency shifts of the νas(P-O) and νs(P-O) IR modes of phosphothreonine, supporting its direct interaction with uranyl. Accordingly, a bathochromic shift in νas(UO2)2+ vibration (from 923 cm−1 to 908 cm−1) was observed upon uranyl coordination to the phosphorylated peptide. Together, our data demonstrate that the phosphoryl group plays a determining role in uranyl binding affinity to proteins at physiological pH.
The two closely related bacteria Bradyrhizobium and Rhodopseudomonas palustris show an unusual mechanism of regulation of photosystem formation by light thanks to a bacteriophytochrome that antirepresses the regulator PpsR. In these two bacteria, we found out, unexpectedly, that two ppsR genes are present. We show that the two Bradyrhizobium PpsR proteins exert antagonistic effects in the regulation of photosystem formation with a classical repressor role for PpsR2 and an unexpected activator role for PpsR1. DNase I footprint analysis show that both PpsR bind to the same DNA TGTN 12 ACA motif that is present in tandem in the bchC promoter and the crtED intergenic region. Interestingly, the cycA and aerR promoter regions that contain only one conserved palindrome are recognized by PpsR2, but not PpsR1. Further biochemical analyses indicate that PpsR1 only is redox sensitive through the formation of an intermolecular disulfide bond, which changes its oligomerization state from a tetramer to an octamer under oxidizing conditions. Moreover, PpsR1 presents a higher DNA affinity under its reduced form in contrast to what has been previously found for PpsR or its homolog CrtJ from the Rhodobacter species. These results suggest that regulation of photosystem synthesis in Bradyrhizobium involves two PpsR competing for the binding to the same photosynthesis genes and this competition might be modulated by two factors: light via the antagonistic action of a bacteriophytochrome on PpsR2 and redox potential via the switch of PpsR1 oligomerization state.
The effect of selenite on the growth rate and protein synthesis has been investigated in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. This photosynthetic bacterium efficiently reduces selenite with intracellular accumulation under both dark aerobic and anaerobic photosynthetic conditions. Addition of 1 mM selenite under these two growth conditions does not affect the final cell density, although a marked slowdown in growth rate is observed under aerobic growth. The proteome analysis of selenite response by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis shows an enhanced synthesis of some chaperones, an elongation factor, and enzymes associated to oxidative stress. The induction of these antioxidant proteins confirms that the major toxic effect of selenite is the formation of reactive oxygen species during its metabolism. In addition, we show that one mutant unable to precipitate selenite, selected from a transposon library, is affected in the smoK gene. This encodes a constituent of a putative ABC transporter implicated in the uptake of polyols. This mutant is less sensitive to selenite and does not express stress proteins identified in the wild type in response to selenite. This suggests that the entry of selenite into the cytoplasm is mediated by a polyol transporter in R. sphaeroides.Selenium, a naturally occurring element, is essential for biological systems at low concentrations but toxic at higher levels. In aerobic conditions, selenium is present predominantly in the high valence toxic and soluble forms selenate (SeO 4 2Ϫ , ϩVI) and selenite (SeO 3 2Ϫ , ϩIV), while the dominant species in anaerobic sediments is the elemental selenium (Se 0 ). In the environment, the reduction of these oxyanions occurs principally by biotic processes. The reduction of selenate or selenite into selenide is required, for example, for the synthesis of selenocysteine, an essential residue involved in the active site of various enzymes (12,38). For a few species of bacteria, selenate or selenite acts as electron acceptors in the first steps of an anaerobic respiratory process similar to denitrification (35). To date, only four species (Thauera selenatis, Sulfospirillum barnesii SES-3, Bacillus arsicoselenatis, and Bacillus selenitireducens) that present such a potential have been isolated (22,29,36). Reduction of selenate and selenite into elemental selenium, which is insoluble and nontoxic, is also used by various species of bacteria to overcome the toxic character of the oxyanions. Detoxification of the selenium oxyanions can also be achieved by methylation of these compounds. Both reduction and/or methylation of selenate and selenite have been demonstrated in the case of purple nonsulfur photosynthetic bacteria (25,39). Intracellular sequestration of the metal after reduction has been demonstrated for Rhodobacter sphaeroides cells in the case of tellurite (26). On the other hand, an extracellular reduction of selenite occurs for bacteria such as Rhodospirillum rubrum (17) or a marine photosynthetic bacterium (41). In addition to their tolerance to high co...
The synthesis of the photosynthetic apparatus of different strains of Rhodopseudomonas palustris has been studied as a function of the oxygen concentration and far-red light. For strain CEA001, only a small amount of photosynthetic apparatus is synthesized in the dark for oxygen concentration higher than 8% whereas synthesis is strongly enhanced by far-red light illumination. This enhancement is due to the action of a bacteriophytochrome (ORF2127/ORF2128), which antagonizes the repressor PpsR. On the contrary, a large fraction of photosystem is synthesized in the dark and far-red illumination induces no enhancement in strain CGA009. This difference in phenotype of strain CGA009 is explained by a single point-mutation R428C in the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif of PpsR, rendering it inactive. In addition, a frame-shift mutation had occurred in the gene encoding bacteriophytochrome (ORF2127/ORF2128), conducting to a truncated inactive sensor. We propose that these mutations occurred in culture. Bacteria have developed a sophisticated regulatory process to synthesize their photosynthetic apparatus when light is available. This process is a critical advantage for the bacteria under natural conditions since they optimize their development depending on the available energy resources. On the contrary, under laboratory growth conditions where there is no substrate limitation, there is no crucial need for such a regulation and deleterious mutations affecting this process are of no importance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.