Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the most common cardiac surgery performed today worldwide. The history of this procedure can be traced back for more than 100 years, and its development has been touched by several pioneers in the field of cardiac surgery, who have contributed with both their successes and failures. With ever increasing follow up and number of patients treated, thinking regarding optimal CABG technique evolves continually. This article reviews the history of CABG from its early experimental work to recent technological advances.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundEuropean surgeons were the first worldwide to use robotic techniques in cardiac surgery and major steps in procedure development were taken in Europe. After a hype in the early 2000s case numbers decreased but due to technological improvements renewed interest can be noted. We assessed the current activities and outcomes in robotically assisted cardiac surgery on the European continent.MethodsData were collected in an international anonymized registry of 26 European centers with a robotic cardiac surgery program.ResultsDuring a 4-year period (2016–2019), 2,563 procedures were carried out [30.0% female, 58.5 (15.4) years old, EuroSCORE II 1.56 (1.74)], including robotically assisted coronary bypass grafting (n = 1266, 49.4%), robotic mitral or tricuspid valve surgery (n = 945, 36.9%), isolated atrial septal defect closure (n = 225, 8.8%), left atrial myxoma resection (n = 54, 2.1%), and other procedures (n = 73, 2.8%). The number of procedures doubled during the study period (from n = 435 in 2016 to n = 923 in 2019). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time in pump assisted cases was 148.6 (63.5) min and the myocardial ischemic time was 88.7 (46.1) min. Conversion to larger thoracic incisions was required in 56 cases (2.2%). Perioperative rates of revision for bleeding, stroke, and mortality were 56 (2.2%), 6 (0.2 %), and 27 (1.1%), respectively. Median postoperative hospital length of stay was 6.6 (6.6) days.ConclusionRobotic cardiac surgery case numbers in Europe are growing fast, including a large spectrum of procedures. Conversion rates are low and clinical outcomes are favorable, indicating safe conduct of these high-tech minimally invasive procedures.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) decreases muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) and cardiac asynchrony. Whether this affects equally patients who clinically respond or not to CRT is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the favorable effects of CRT on MSNA disappear on CRT interruption only in those who respond to CRT. Twenty-three consecutive CHF patients participated in the study, among whom 16 presented a symptomatic improvement by one or more New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes 15 +/- 5 mo after CRT (responders), and seven had not improved after 12 +/- 4 mo of CRT (nonresponders). MSNA and echocardiographic recordings were obtained in random order during atrio-right ventricular pacing (ARV), without stimulation in patients who were not pacemaker dependent (OFF, n = 17), and during atrio-biventricular pacing (BIV). Responders had a longer 6-min walking distance, a lower NYHA class and brain natriuretic peptide levels, and a better quality of life than did nonresponders (all P < 0.05). MSNA increased by 25 +/- 7% in the responders, whereas it remained unchanged in the nonresponders, when shifting from the BIV mode to a nonsynchronous condition (ARV and OFF modes) (P < 0.01). Cardiac output decreased by 0.7 +/- 0.2 l/min in the responders but did not change when shifting from the BIV mode to the nonsynchronous pacing mode in the nonresponders (P < 0.01). In conclusion, reversible sympathoinhibition is a marker of the clinical response to CRT.

Background-Reappearance of low-frequency (LF) (Ϯ0.10 Hz) oscillations in RR interval (RR) after cardiac transplantation is indicative of sympathetic efferent reinnervation. We hypothesized that restored LF oscillations in RR in heart transplant recipients (HTRs) are linked to oscillations in muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA). Methods and Results-RR, RR variability, and MSNA were recorded 5Ϯ2 months (nϭ7, short-term HTRs) and 138Ϯ8 months (nϭ7, long-term HTRs) after heart transplantation and compared with matched hypertensive patients (nϭ7). A coherence function determined the coupling between LF oscillations in MSNA and RR. RR variance did not differ between short-term and long-term HTRs. However, LF variability was only 1Ϯ0.5 ms 2 in the short-term HTRs but was 15Ϯ8 ms 2 in the long-term HTRs (PϽ0.05). Normalized LF variability was also higher in the long-term HTRs (40Ϯ14 normalized unites) versus the short-term HTRs (6Ϯ3 normalized united, PϽ0.05) but did not differ from the LF variability of the hypertensive patients. Long-term HTRs were taking less cyclosporine (PϽ0.01) but had higher MSNA than the short-term HTRs (62Ϯ7 versus 31Ϯ7 burst/min, respectively, PϽ0.05). Coherence between LF oscillations in MSNA and RR was similar in the long-term HTRs (0.59Ϯ0.11) and the hypertensive patients (0.60Ϯ0.07) and was 3-fold greater than in the short-term HTRs (0.20Ϯ0.06, PϽ0.05). Conclusions-Cardiac reinnervation after long-term heart transplantation is characterized by a restoration of the coherence between LF oscillations in RR and MSNA. Higher MSNA in long-term than in short-term HTRs suggests that time elapsed after cardiac transplantation may be a major determinant of sympathetic excitation in heart transplant recipients.

No abstract

No abstract