Group II introns are found in eubacteria and eubacterial-derived, organellar genomes. They have ribozymic activities, by which they direct and catalyze the splicing of the exons flanking them. This chapter reviews the secondary structure and known tertiary interactions of the ribozymic component of group II introns in relation to the problems of specifying splice sites and building a catalytic core. We pay special attention to the relationship between the transesterification and hydrolytic modes of initiating splicing and the stereospecificities of these reactions. A number of group II introns encode proteins of the reverse transcriptase family; the activity of these proteins enables the host introns to change genomic locations by mechanisms that are only beginning to be deciphered. Finally, we briefly discuss multipartite and post-transcriptionally edited group II introns, together with the intron microcosm of Euglena gracilis chloroplasts and the possible relationships between group II and spliceosome-catalyzed splicing processes.

Like nuclear premessenger introns, group II self-splicing introns are excised from primary transcripts as branched molecules, containing a 2'-5' phosphodiester bond. For this reason, it is widely believed that the ribozyme (catalytic RNA) core of group II introns, or some evolutionarily related molecule, gave rise to the RNA components of the spliceosomal splicing machinery of the eukaryotic nucleus. One difficulty with this hypothesis has been the restricted distribution of group II introns. Unlike group I self-splicing introns, which interrupt not only organelle primary transcripts, but also some bacterial and nuclear genes, group II introns seemed to be confined to mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes (reviewed in ref. 6). We now report the discovery of group II introns both in cyanobacteria (the ancestors of chloroplasts) and the gamma subdivision of purple bacteria, or proteobacteria, whose alpha subdivision probably gave rise to mitochondria. At least one of these introns actually self-splices in vitro.

Replicative helicases are essential proteins that unwind DNA in front of replication forks. Their loading depends on accessory proteins and in bacteria, DnaC and DnaI are well characterized loaders. However, most bacteria do not express either of these two proteins. Instead, they are proposed to rely on DciA, an ancestral protein unrelated to DnaC/I. While the DciA structure from Vibrio cholerae shares no homology with DnaC, it reveals similarities with DnaA and DnaX, two proteins involved during replication initiation. As other bacterial replicative helicases, VcDnaB adopts a toroid-shaped homo-hexameric structure, but with a slightly open dynamic conformation in the free state. We show that VcDnaB can load itself on DNA in vitro and that VcDciA stimulates this function, resulting in an increased DNA unwinding. VcDciA interacts with VcDnaB with a 3/6 stoichiometry and we show that a determinant residue, which discriminates DciA- and DnaC/I-helicases, is critical in vivo. Our work is the first step toward the understanding of the ancestral mode of loading of bacterial replicative helicases on DNA. It sheds light on the strategy employed by phage helicase loaders to hijack bacterial replicative helicases and may explain the recurrent domestication of dnaC/I through evolution in bacteria.

Delivery of the replicative helicase onto DNA is an essential step in the initiation of replication. In bacteria, DnaC (in Escherichia coli) and DnaI (in Bacillus subtilis) are representative of the two known mechanisms that assist the replicative helicase at this stage. Here, we establish that these two strategies cannot be regarded as prototypical of the bacterial domain since dnaC and dnaI (dna[CI]) are present in only a few bacterial phyla. We show that dna[CI] was domesticated at least seven times through evolution in bacteria and at the expense of one gene, which we rename dciA (dna[CI] antecedent), suggesting that DciA and Dna[CI] share a common function. We validate this hypothesis by establishing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that DciA possesses the attributes of the replicative helicase-operating proteins associated with replication initiation.

Bacterial chromosomes harbour a unique origin of bidirectional replication, oriC . They are almost always circular, with replication terminating in a region diametrically opposite to oriC , the terminus. The oriC -terminus organisation is reflected by the orientation of the genes and by the disposition of DNA-binding protein motifs implicated in the coordination of chromosome replication and segregation with cell division. Correspondingly, the E. coli and B. subtilis model bacteria possess a replication fork trap system, Tus/ ter and RTP/ ter , respectively, which enforces replication termination in the terminus region. Here, we show that tus and rtp are restricted to four clades of bacteria, suggesting that tus was recently domesticated from a plasmid gene. We further demonstrate that there is no replication fork system in Vibrio cholerae , a bacterium closely related to E. coli . Marker frequency analysis showed that replication forks originating from ectopic origins were not blocked in the terminus region of either of the two V. cholerae chromosomes, but progressed normally until they encountered an opposite fork. As expected, termination synchrony of the two chromosomes is disrupted by these ectopic origins. Finally, we show that premature completion of the primary chromosome replication did not modify the choreography of segregation of its terminus region.

DomainSieve is implemented as a web resource and is accessible at http://stat.genopole.cnrs.fr/ds/.

SummaryA group II intron that was previously identified within Azotobacter vinelandii by polymerase chain reaction with consensus primers has been completely sequenced, together with its flanking exons. In contrast to other bacterial members of group II, which are associated with mobile or other presumably nonessential DNA, the A. vinelandii intron is inserted within the termination codon of the groEL coding sequence, which it changes from UAA to UAG. Both the host gene and the intron appear to be functional as (i) the ribozyme component of the intron selfsplices in vitro and (ii) both intron-carrying and intronless versions of the single-copy groEL gene from A. vinelandii complement groEL mutations in Escherichia coli . Moreover, analysis of nucleotide substitutions within and around a closely related intron sequence that is present at the same site in Azotobacter chroococcum provides indirect evidence of intron transposition posterior to the divergence of the two Azotobacter taxa. Somewhat surprisingly, however, analyses of RNA extracted from cells that had or had not undergone a heat shock show that the bulk of groEL transcripts end within the first 140 nucleotides of the intron. These findings are discussed in the light of our current knowledge of the biochemistry of group II introns.

At the onset of the initiation of chromosome replication, bacterial replicative helicases are recruited and loaded on the DnaA-oriC nucleoprotein platform, assisted by proteins like DnaC/DnaI or DciA. Two orders of bacteria appear, however, to lack either of these factors, raising the question of the essentiality of these factors in bacteria. Through a phylogenomic approach, we identified a pair of genes that could have substituted for dciA. The two domesticated genes are specific of the dnaC/dnaI- and dciA-lacking organisms and apparently domesticated from lambdoid phage genes. They derive from λO and λP and were renamed dopC and dopE, respectively. DopE is expected to bring the replicative helicase to the bacterial origin of replication, while DopC might assist DopE in this function. The confirmation of the implication of DopCE in the handling of the replicative helicase at the onset of replication in these organisms would generalize to all bacteria and therefore to all living organisms the need for specific factors dedicated to this function.