A PIJfATIVE chemokine receptor that we previously cloned and termed LESTR 1 has recently been shown to function as a coreceptor (termed fusin) for lymphocyte-tropic HIV-1 strains 2 • Cells expressing CD4 became permissive to infection with T -cellline-adapted HIV-1 strains of the syncytium-i.nducing phenotype after transfection with LESTR/fusin complementary DNA. We report here the identification of a human chemokine of the CXC type, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), as the naturaJ ligand for LESTR/fusin, and we propose the term CXCR-4 for this receptor, in keeping with the new cbemokine-receptor nomenclature. SDF-1 activates Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with CXCR-4 eDNA as well as blood leukocytes and lymphocytes. In cell lines expressing CXCR-4 and CD4, and in blood lymphocytes, SDF-1 is a powerful inhibitor of infection by lymphocyte-tropic HIV-1 strains, whereas the CC chemokines RANTES, MIP-1a and MIP-1~, which were shown previously to prevent infection with primary, monocyte-tropic viruses 3 , are inactive. In combination with CC chemokines, which block the infection with monocyte/macrophage-tropic viruses, SDF-1 could help to decrease virus load and prevent the emergence of the syncytium-inducing viruses which are characteristic of the late stages of AIDS 4• LESTR (leukocyte-expressed seven-transmembrane-domain receptor) is an orphan receptor with structural similarity to chemokine receptors. Despite extensive testing of a large number of chemokines, the ligand for LESTR remained elusive 1 • Murine SDF-1 was described as a factor that is produced by bonemarrow stromal cells and shown to induce proliferation of B-cell progenitorsM as well as recruitment of T cells 7 • The human homologue, which was cloned subsequently, is virtually identical to murine SDF-1 (see Methods). SDF-1 is a CXCchemokine with the typical four-cysteine motif and the first two cysteines separated by one amino acid 8 • When human SDF-1 was tested on the CH0-1C2 clone which stably expresses LESTR, a transient rise of cytosolic free Ca 2 + ([Ca 2 +];) was observed (Fig. 1a). This response, which is characteristic of the action of chemokines on blood leukocytes, was not observed with parental CHO cells. Other chemokines, including RANTES (for regulation-upon-activation, normal T expressed and secreted) macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP), MIP-1o: and MIP-1~, were not active. Monocytes, neutrophils and phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-activated peripheral-blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were also stimulated by SDF-1, as shown by [Ca 2 +]; changes and chemotaxis (Fig. 1b, d). Real-time recordings of Ca 2 + mobilization after sequential stimulation are a reliable way to assess receptor usage by chemokines 8 • Stimulation with a chemokine (at saturating concentrations) causes receptor desensitization, and no response is observed when the cells are restimulated within a short time by a chemokine acting on the same receptor. As shown in Fig. lc, monocytes stimulated with SDF-1 remained fully responsive to subsequent stimulation with ...

A role for redox regulation in activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor was suggested by the observation that DNA binding activity of free protein, but not preformed DNA-protein complex, is inhibited by -SH modifying agents but enhanced by reducing agents. Mutagenesis of conserved cysteine residues in the p50 subunit identified amino acid 62 as being important for DNA binding, as a serine substitution at this position reduces DNA binding affinity, but renders the protein insensitive to -SH modifying agents. DNA binding activity of the wild type protein but not the amino acid 62 mutant was also stimulated by thioredoxin while detection of disulphide cross linked dimers in p50 but not the amino acid 62 mutant suggests that thioredoxin stimulates DNA binding by reduction of a disulphide bond involving cysteine 62. The physiological relevance of these findings was supported by the observation that cotransfection of a plasmid expressing human thioredoxin and an HIV LTR driven reporter construct resulted in an NF-kappa B dependent increase in expression of the reporter gene. Thus modification of p50 by thioredoxin, a gene induced by stimulation of T-lymphocytes in parallel with NF-kappa B translocation, is a likely step in the cascade of events leading to full NF-kappa B activation.

Ligation of CCR5 by the CC chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α or MIP-1β, and of CXCR4 by the CXC chemokine SDF-1α, profoundly inhibits the replication of HIV strains that use these coreceptors for entry into CD4+ T lymphocytes. The mechanism of entry inhibition is not known. We found a rapid and extensive downregulation of CXCR4 by SDF-1α and of CCR5 by RANTES or the antagonist RANTES(9-68). Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that CCR5 and CXCR4, after binding to their ligands, are internalized into vesicles that qualify as early endosomes as indicated by colocalization with transferrin receptors. Internalization was not affected by treatment with Bordetella pertussis toxin, showing that it is independent of signaling via Gi-proteins. Removal of SDF-1α led to rapid, but incomplete surface reexpression of CXCR4, a process that was not inhibited by cycloheximide, suggesting that the coreceptor is recycling from the internalization pool. Deletion of the COOH-terminal, cytoplasmic domain of CXCR4 did not affect HIV entry, but prevented SDF-1α–induced receptor downregulation and decreased the potency of SDF-1α as inhibitor of HIV replication. Our results indicate that the ability of the coreceptor to internalize is not required for HIV entry, but contributes to the HIV suppressive effect of CXC and CC chemokines.

Dengue virus (DV) is a mosquito‐borne flavivirus that causes haemorrhagic fever in humans. DV primarily targets immature dendritic cells (DCs) after a bite by an infected mosquito vector. Here, we analysed the interactions between DV and human‐monocyte‐derived DCs at the level of virus entry. We show that the DC‐specific ICAM3‐grabbing non‐integrin (DC‐SIGN) molecule, a cell‐surface, mannose‐specific, C‐type lectin, binds mosquito‐cell‐derived DVs and allows viral replication. Conclusive evidence for the involvement of DC‐SIGN in DV infection was obtained by the inhibition of viral infection by anti‐DC‐SIGN antibodies and by the soluble tetrameric ectodomain of DC‐SIGN. Our data show that DC‐SIGN functions as a DV‐binding lectin by interacting with the DV envelope glycoprotein. Mosquito‐cell‐derived DVs may have differential infectivity for DC‐SIGN‐expressing cells. We suggest that the differential use of DC‐SIGN by viral envelope glycoproteins may account for the immunopathogenesis of DVs.

The WHIM syndrome is a rare immunodeficiency disorder characterized by warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis. Dominant heterozygous mutations of the gene encoding CXCR4, a G-protein-coupled receptor with a unique ligand, CXCL12, have been associated with this pathology. We studied patients belonging to 3 different pedigrees. Two siblings inherited a CXCR4 mutation encoding a novel C-terminally truncated receptor. Two unrelated patients were found to bear a wild-type CXCR4 open reading frame. Circulating lymphocytes and neutrophils from all patients displayed similar functional alterations of CXCR4-mediated responses featured by a marked enhancement of G-protein-dependent responses. This phenomenon relies on the refractoriness of CXCR4 to be both desensitized and internalized in response to CXCL12. Therefore, the aberrant dysfunction of the CXCR4-mediated signaling constitutes a common biologic trait of WHIM syndromes with different causative genetic anomalies. Responses to other chemokines, namely CCL4, CCL5, and CCL21, were preserved, suggesting that, in clinical forms associated with a wild-type CXCR4 open reading frame, the genetic anomaly might target an effector with some degree of selectivity for the CXCL12/ CXCR4 axis. We propose that the sus- IntroductionThe CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1/ CXCL12) 1,2 is the sole natural ligand for CXCR4, 3,4 a broadly expressed G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). 5 The unique, nonpromiscuous interaction between CXCL12 and CXCR4 is critically involved in the organogenesis of a number of phylogenetically distant animal species. [6][7][8][9][10][11] In addition, B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone marrow (BM) myelopoiesis are regulated by the CXCL12/ CXCR4 axis during embryogenesis. [12][13][14] In postnatal life, the CXCL12/CXCR4 couple controls the BM homing of CD34 ϩ cells and lymphocyte trafficking. [15][16][17][18] Besides the regulation of homeostatic processes, CXCR4 has been implicated in the development of infectious 3,19 and inflammatory diseases as well as tumor metastasis. [20][21][22][23] Recently, inherited heterozygous autosomal dominant mutations of the CXCR4 gene, which result in the truncation of the carboxyl-terminus (C-tail) of the receptor, were found to be associated with the WHIM syndrome. 24 This rare immunodeficiency disease is characterized by disseminated human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent bacterial infections, and myelokathexis, a form of neutropenia associated with abnormal retention of mature neutrophils in the BM. [25][26][27] Patients with WHIM also exhibit a marked T-cell lymphopenia. The disorder is clinically and genetically heterogeneous, 28 since hypogammaglobulinemia and verrucosis were absent in some cases, 29 and individuals with isolated myelokathexis were found to be wild type for the CXCR4 gene. 24 However, the altered mechanism accounting for the pathogenesis of the WHIM syndrome not associated to CXCR4 mutations remains unknown. Here, we provide original...

Biological properties of chemokines are believed to be influenced by their association with glycosaminoglycans. Surface plasmon resonance kinetic analysis shows that the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1␣ (SDF-1␣), which binds the CXCR4 receptor, associates with heparin with an affinity constant of 38.4 nM (k on ‫؍‬ 2.16 ؋ 10 6 M ؊1 s ؊1 and k off ‫؍‬ 0.083 ؋ s ؊1 ). A modified SDF-1␣ (SDF-1 3/6) was generated by combined substitution of the basic cluster of residues Lys 24 , His 25 , and Lys 27 by Ser. SDF-1 3/6 conserves the global native structure and functional properties of SDF-1␣, but it is unable to interact with sensor chip-immobilized heparin. The biological relevance of these in vitro findings was investigated. SDF-1␣ was unable to bind in a CXCR4-independent manner on epithelial cells that were treated with heparan sulfate (HS)-degrading enzymes or constitutively lack HS expression. The inability of SDF-1 3/6 to bind to cells underlines the importance of the identified basic cluster for the physiological interactions of SDF-1␣ with HS. Importantly, the amino-terminal domain of SDF-1␣ which is required for binding to, and activation of, CXCR4 remains exposed after binding to HS and is recognized by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody directed against the first residues of the chemokine. Overall, these findings indicate that the Lys 24 , His 25 , and Lys 27 cluster of residues forms, or is an essential part of, the HS-binding site which is distinct from that required for binding to, and signaling through, CXCR4.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome codes for highly mannosylated envelope proteins, which are naturally retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. We found that the HCV envelope glycoprotein E2 binds the dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) and the related liver endothelial cell lectin L-SIGN through high-mannose N-glycans. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)1 is the major causative agent of non-A, non-B hepatitis throughout the world with more than 170 million people infected (1). Contamination with infected blood by injecting drug users is the primary risk factor for acquiring HCV infection. The majority of infected patients are unable to clear the virus, and many develop chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (2). Replication of the HCV genome could be demonstrated in vivo and in vitro in liver hepatocytes (3, 4) and hematopoietic cells including dendritic cells and B cells (5, 6). However, the molecular mechanism by which the virus targets to these sites of replication, notably in the liver, is not known.HCV is a small, enveloped, plus-strand RNA virus belonging to the family flaviviridae and genus hepacivirus. The HCV RNA genome is 9600 nucleotides in length and encodes a single polyprotein that is post-translationally cleaved into up to 10 polypeptides including three structural proteins (core, E1, and E2), located at the N terminus, and five nonstructural proteins (1,7,8). Shortly after translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), oligosaccharide transferase catalyzes addition of Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 complexes at up to 6 (E1) and 11 (E2) N-glycosylation sites (for review see Ref. 9). Glucose residues are removed by glucosidases I and II, and correctly folded proteins are released from ER chaperones calnexin and calreticulin (10 -13). The transmembrane domains of E1 and E2 are responsible for both heterodimerization (14) and retention of the glycoproteins in a high-mannose EndoH-sensitive glycoform in the ER (15)(16)(17). By analogy to other flaviviruses it is assumed that HCV capsids bud from the cytoplasm into the ER and that enveloped particles follow the secretion pathway through the Golgi. However, attempts to produce secreted HCV particles in vitro have not been successful so far (18 -20), and it is not known if E1 and E2 on mature infectious virions possess a high-mannose, complex, or mixed glycosylation.Several receptors have been proposed that could play a role in HCV entry into hepatocytes. The low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor has been shown to mediate HCV internalization via binding to virus-associated LDL particles (21,22). A second putative HCV receptor, the tetraspanin CD81, has been identified as a high affinity binding receptor (1.8 nM) for soluble recombinant E2 from HCV genotype 1a (23, 24). CD81 and LDL receptor are expressed in most cell types and thus likely do not account for the hepatic tropism of the virus. Furthermore E2 binds to the hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2, which does not express CD81 (25). More recently tw...

Dengue virus (DV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that causes hemorrhagic fever in humans. In the natural infection, DV is introduced into human skin by an infected mosquito vector where it is believed to target immature dendritic cells (DCs) and Langerhans cells (LCs). We found that DV productively infects DCs but not LCs. We show here that the interactions between DV E protein, the sole mannosylated glycoprotein present on DV particles, and the C-type lectin dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) are essential for DV infection of DCs. Binding of mannosylated N-glycans on DV E protein to DC-SIGN triggers a rapid and efficient internalization of the viral glycoprotein. However, we observed that endocytosisdefective DC-SIGN molecules allow efficient DV replication, indicating that DC-SIGN endocytosis is dispensable for the internalization step in DV entry. Together, these results argue in favor of a mechanism by which DC-SIGN enhances DV entry and infection in cis. We propose that DC-SIGN concentrates mosquito-derived DV particles at the cell surface to allow efficient interaction with an as yet unidentified entry factor that is ultimately responsible for DV internalization and pHdependent fusion into DCs.