The term 'catastrophic' antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is used to define an accelerated form of APS resulting in multiorgan failure. Although catastrophic APS patients represent less than 1% of all patients with APS, they are usually in a life-threatening medical situation that requires high clinical awareness. The careful and open discussion of several proposals by all participants in the presymposium workshop on APS consensus, held in Taormina on occasion of the 10th International Congress on aPL and chaired by Munther A Khamashta and Yehuda Shoenfeld (29 September 2002), has allowed the acceptation of a preliminary set of classification criteria. On the other hand, the optimal management of catastrophic APS must have three clear aims: to treat any precipitating factors (prompt use of antibiotics if infection is suspected, amputation for any necrotic organ, high awareness in patients with APS who undergo an operation or an invasive procedure), to prevent and to treat the ongoing thrombotic events and to suppress the excessive cytokine 'storm'. Anticoagulation (usually intravenous heparin followed by oral anticoagulants), corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous gammaglobulins and, if associated with lupus flare, cyclophosphamide, are the most commonly used treatments for catastrophic APS patients.

ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of the main causes of morbi-mortality in the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during a 10-year-follow-up period and to compare the frequency of early manifestations with those that appeared later.MethodsIn 1999, we started an observational study of 1000 APS patients from 13 European countries. All had medical histories documented when entered into the study and were followed prospectively during the ensuing 10 years.Results53.1% of the patients had primary APS, 36.2% had APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and 10.7% APS associated with other diseases. Thrombotic events appeared in 166 (16.6%) patients during the first 5-year period and in 115 (14.4%) during the second 5-year period. The most common events were strokes, transient ischaemic attacks, deep vein thromboses and pulmonary embolism. 127 (15.5%) women became pregnant (188 pregnancies) and 72.9% of pregnancies succeeded in having one or more live births. The most common obstetric complication was early pregnancy loss (16.5% of the pregnancies). Intrauterine growth restriction (26.3% of the total live births) and prematurity (48.2%) were the most frequent fetal morbidities. 93 (9.3%) patients died and the most frequent causes of death were severe thrombosis (36.5%) and infections (26.9%). Nine (0.9%) cases of catastrophic APS occurred and 5 (55.6%) of them died. The survival probability at 10 years was 90.7%.ConclusionsPatients with APS still develop significant morbidity and mortality despite current treatment. It is imperative to increase the efforts in determining optimal prognostic markers and therapeutic measures to prevent these complications.

We analyzed the clinical and laboratory characteristics of 50 patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (5 from our clinics and 45 from a MEDLINE computer-assisted review of the literature from 1992 through 1996). Thirty-three (66%) patients were female and 17 (34%) were male. Twenty-eight (56%) patients had primary APS, 15 (30%) had defined systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 6 (12%) had "lupus-like" syndrome, and 1 (2%) had rheumatoid arthritis. Mean age of patients in this series was 38 +/- 14 years (range, 11-74 yr). Three (6%) patients developed the clinical picture of catastrophic APS under the age of 15 years, and 11 (22%) were 50 years old or more. In 11 (22%) patients, precipitating factors contributed to the development of catastrophic APS (infections in 3, drugs in 3, minor surgical procedures in 3, anticoagulation withdrawal in 2, and hysterectomy in 1). The presentation of the acute multi-organ failure was usually complex, involving multiple organs simultaneously or in a very short period of time. The majority of patients manifested microangiopathy--that is, occlusive vascular disease affecting predominantly small vessels of organs, particularly kidney, lungs, brain, heart, and liver--with a minority of patients experiencing only large vessel occlusions. Thrombocytopenia was reported in 34 (68%) patients, hemolytic anemia in 13 (26%), disseminated intravascular coagulation in 14 (28%), and schistocytes in 7 (14%). The following antibodies were detected: lupus anticoagulant (94%), anticardiolipin antibodies (94%), anti-dsDNA (87% of patients with SLE), antinuclear antibodies (58%), anti-Ro/SS-A (8%), anti-RNP (8%), and anti-La/SS-B (2%). Anticoagulation was used in 70% of the patients, steroids in 70%, plasmapheresis in 40%, cyclophosphamide in 34%, intravenous gammaglobulins in 16%, and splenectomy in 4%. Most patients, however, received a combination of nonsurgical therapies. Death occurred in 25 of the 50 (50%) patients. In most, cardiac problems seemed to be the major cause of death. In several of these, respiratory failure was also present, usually due to acute respiratory distress syndrome and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Among the 20 patients who received the combination of anticoagulation, steroids, and plasmapheresis or intravenous gammaglobulins, recovery occurred in 14 (70%) patients. The use of ancrod and defibrotide appeared to be effective in the 2 respective patients in whom they were used.

The immune defect that could account for the multisystemic involvement that characterizes systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains unknown. We hypothesized that iterative disease flares correspond to a recurrent defect in the peripheral immune suppression exerted by naturally occurring T regulatory cells (Tregs). Surprisingly, Tregs isolated from lupus patients show the same phenotypic and functional characteristics as corresponding cells found in healthy controls. A decrease in the proportion of circulating Tregs among other CD4+ T cells is nevertheless evidenced in active patients when this group is compared with healthy controls (0.57 ± 0.24%, n = 45 vs 1.29 ± 0.38%, n = 82, p < 0.0001) or with inactive patients (1.22 ± 0.67%, n = 62, p < 0.0001). In contrast, the proportion of Tregs in other systemic autoimmune diseases such as primary Sjögren syndrome and inflammatory myopathy does not significantly differ from controls’ values (1.15 ± 0.46%, n = 21, p = 0.09 and 1.16 ± 0.44%, n = 16, p = 0.43, respectively). Lupus Tregs do not accumulate in either the lymph nodes or the diseased kidneys and are not killed by a circulating soluble factor, but demonstrate in vitro a heightened sensitivity to Fas-induced apoptosis. Finally, we show that the extent of Treg depletion correlates with the clinical severity of the flare. SLE flares are therefore associated with a global Treg depletion and not with a phenomenon of tissue redistribution. In summary, we suggest that the physiopathology of SLE could be tied to a defect in the homeostatic control of the Treg subpopulation.

Sarcoidosis is characterized by extensive local inflammation (granuloma, cytokine secretion) associated with anergy (poor response to antigens in vitro and in vivo). We postulated that this paradoxical situation would correspond to a disequilibrium between effector and regulatory T lymphocytes (T reg cells). We show that CD4+CD25brightFoxP3+ cells accumulate at the periphery of sarcoid granulomas, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and in peripheral blood of patients with active disease. These cells exhibited powerful antiproliferative activity, yet did not completely inhibit TNF-α production. Sarcoidosis is therefore associated with a global T reg cell subset amplification whose activity would be insufficient to control local inflammation. At the same time, peripheral T reg cells exert powerful antiproliferative activity that may account for the state of anergy. Altogether, these findings advance our conceptual understanding of immune regulation in a way that resolves the immune paradox of sarcoidosis and permit us to envisage a profound clinical impact of T reg cell manipulation on immunity.

We cultivated the bacterium of Whipple's disease, detected specific antibodies in tissue from the source patient, and generated specific antibodies in mice to be used in the immunodetection of the microorganism in tissues. The development of a serologic test for Whipple's disease may now be possible.

No abstract

Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare disease characterized by the simultaneous or sequential development of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and/or immune neutropenia. To better describe the characteristics and outcome of ES in adults, a survey was initiated in 2005. The data from 68 patients (60% of them women) fulfilling strict inclusion criteria for ES are reported. The mean age at time of ITP and/or AIHA onset was 52 plus or minus 33 years, both cytopenias occurred simultaneously in 37 cases (54.5%). ES was considered as "primary" in 34 patients (50%) but was associated with an underlying disorder in half of the cases, including mainly systemic lupus, lymphoproliferative disorders, and common variable immunodeficiency. All patients were given corticosteroids, but 50 of them (73%) required at least one "second-line" treatment, including splenectomy(n ‫؍‬ 19) and rituximab (n ‫؍‬ 11). At time of analysis, after a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, only 22 patients (32%) were in remission off treatment; 16 (24%) had died. In elderly patients, the risk of cardiovascular manifestations related to AIHA seems to be higher than the ITP-related risk of severe bleeding. In conclusion, ES is a potentially life-threatening condition that may be associated with other underlying autoimmune or lymphoproliferative disorders. (Blood. 2009;114:3167-3172)