Purpose
The efficacy of MabThera to treat Graves'orbitopathy (GO) is actually controversial, because of opposite results of the 2 randomized controlled trials (Stan M et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; Salvi M et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015).
Methods
Real‐life use and efficacy of Mathera in GO in a multicentre retrospective study. Patients were enrolled in case of cortico‐dependant/resistant GO, with the help of endocrinologists of the French Thyroid Research Group. GO were classified according 3 components: inflammatory (CAS ≥3), muscular (constant diplopia) and neurological (visual acuity<20/40). Success was defined by the improvement of one component of the orbitopathy, without any deterioration of others.
Results
40 patients were included. 5 of the 8 patients treated simultaneously by mabthera and orbital decompression (visual threatening disease) had favourable evolution. 32 were treated because of corticoresistant disease (mean cumulative corticoid dose of 8 g; mean disease duration of 19,1 months). 6 months success was achieved for 67,5% of this group. Initial CAS (3,28 ±1,57) was significantly reduced after 3 and 6 months (1,61 ±1,1; p< 0,01). Initial visual acuity improved significantly after 3 months. All diplopic patients remained diplopic. Logistic regression revealed that initial CAS ≥3 were associated with positive treatment response (OR 3.43); smoking status was a negative pronostic factor (OR 10).
Conclusions
We present the largest cohort of patients treated by Mabthera for GO. Our mean decrease of CAS after 6 months (1.68) is better than Stan's study (1.2), but not as good as Salvi (3.8). This could be explained by our delay before treatment initiation, quicker than Stan (28.9 months) but longer than Salvi (4.5 months). Mabthera could be useful second line treatments in case of recent and still active GO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.