Background Understanding the changes in emergency department (ED) visit patterns during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is important for effectively operating EDs during the pandemic. We aimed to analyze the changes in pediatric ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine the relationship between the number of ED visits and the stringency of government social distancing measures. Methods This multicenter retrospective study used data of pediatric (age < 18 years) ED visits in Seoul metropolitan area from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. Patient demographics, ED results, and diagnoses were compared during the COVID-19 period and the previous year. To evaluate the effect of the stringency of social distancing measures on the number of ED visits, a Poisson regression model was developed with month, year, and the average monthly Government Response Stringency Index (GRSI) as fixed effects. Results In total, 190,732 patients were included. The number of pediatric ED visits during the COVID-19 period was 58.1% lower than in the previous year. There were disproportionate decreases in the numbers of ED visits for children in early childhood (66.5%), low-acuity children (55.2-63.8%), those who did not use an ambulance (59.0%), and those visiting the ED for noninjury complaints (64.9%). The proportion of admissions increased from 11.9% to 16.6%. For every 10-point increase in the GRSI, there was a 15.1% decrease in monthly ED visits. Conclusion A striking decrease in pediatric ED visits was observed during the COVID-19 outbreak, the scale which was associated with the stringency of government policies. Changes in the number and characteristics of children visiting the ED should be considered to facilitate the effective operation of EDs during the pandemic.

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of bedside ultrasound (US) performed by emergency physicians for diagnosing skull fractures in children 0 to 4 years old compared with the accuracy of head computed tomography (CT). We also sought to investigate characteristics and precautions associated with US. Methods This single-center prospective study involved children 0 to 4 years old who had a history of head trauma. Bedside US was performed by emergency medicine physicians, and the results were compared with CT scan interpretations provided by attending radiologists. The accuracy of US for the diagnosis of skull fractures was calculated, and the errors were reviewed. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. Skull fracture was present in 13 patients (14.9%), according to CT. Bedside US had a sensitivity and specificity of 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.0%–93.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 93.9%–100%), respectively. Overall positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 65.5%–100%), and negative predictive value was 96.1% (95% CI, 88.3%–99.0%). Three false-negative cases were observed. Conclusions Bedside US performed by emergency medicine physicians with short focused US training is a useful tool for diagnosing skull fractures in children 0 to 4 years of age. However, there were 3 false-negative cases. A meticulous examination is needed in the area adjacent to the orbital wall and skull base.

ObjectiveThis study assessed the ability of the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) score to predict the outcome of OHCA patients who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH).MethodsThis study included OHCA patients treated with TH between January 2010 and December 2013. The APACHE II score, SAPS II, and SOFA score were calculated at the time of admission and 24 h and 48 h after intensive care unit admission. The OHCA score was calculated at the time of admission. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate outcome predictability.ResultsData from a total of 173 patients were included in the analysis. The APACHE II score at 0 h and 48 h, SAPS II at 48 h, and OHCA score had moderate discrimination for mortality (AUC: 0.715, 0.750, 0.720, 0.740). For neurologic outcomes, the APACHE II score at 0 h and 48 h, SAPS II at 0 h and 48 h, and OHCA score showed moderate discrimination (AUC: 0.752, 0.738, 0.771, 0.771, 0.764). The APACHE II score, SAPS II and SOFA score at various time points, in addition to the OHCA score, were independent predictors of mortality and a poor neurologic outcome.ConclusionsThe APACHE II score, SAPS II, SOFA score, and OHCA score have different capabilities in discriminating and estimating hospital mortality and neurologic outcomes. The OHCA score, APACHE II score and SAPS II at time zero and 48 h offer moderate predictive accuracy. Other scores at 0 h and 48 h, except for the SOFA score, are independently associated with 30-day mortality and poor cerebral performance.

This study aimed to determine whether the combination of procalcitonin (PCT) and S100B improves prognostic performance compared to either alone in cardiac arrest (CA) patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM). We performed a prospective cohort study of CA patients treated with TTM. PCT and S100B levels were obtained at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. The prognostic performance was analyzed using each marker and the combination of the 2 markers for predicting poor neurological outcome at 3 months and mortality at 14 days and 3 months. A total of 97 patients were enrolled, of which 67 (69.1%) had poor neurological outcome. S100B showed a better prognostic performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.934; sensitivity, 77.6%; and specificity, 100%) than PCT (AUC, 0.861; sensitivity, 70.2%; and specificity, 83.3%) with the highest prognostic value at 24 hours. The combination of 24-hour PCT and S100B values (S100B ≥0.2 μg/L or PCT ≥6.6 ng/mL) improved sensitivity (85.07%) compared with S100B alone. In multivariate analysis, PCT was associated with mortality at 14 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.064, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.014–1.118), whereas S100B was associated with neurological outcomes at 3 months (OR: 9.849, 95% CI: 2.089–46.431). The combination of PCT and S100B improved prognostic performance compared to the use of either biomarker alone in CA patient treated with TTM. Further studies that will identify the optimal cutoff values for these biomarkers must be conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of oral ondansetron on the incidence of vomiting in children who receive intramuscular (IM) ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department (ED). Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a children's hospital ED, patients receiving IM ketamine (5 mg/kg) for ED procedures were randomized to receive either oral ondansetron (2 mg or 4 mg) or placebo 15 minutes before the ketamine injection. We recorded whether vomiting occurred in the ED postsedation or up to 12 hours after discharge with telephone follow-up and compared ED length of stay and parental satisfaction. Results: Thirty two children were randomized to placebo and 31 to ondansetron. The groups were similar in age, sex, and fasting duration. ED vomiting was no significant difference with ondansetron: 7 of 31 (22.6%) versus 6 of 32 (18.8%), P=0.707, difference-3.8 (95% confidence interval-23.8% to 16.2%). Follow-up completed in 82.5%. The vomiting in the ED or after discharge in two groups, there was no significant difference: 7 of 27 (25.9%) versus 12 of 25 (48.0%), P=0.165, difference 22.1% (95% confidence interval-3.5% to 47.7%). ED length of stay and parental satisfaction were similar between groups. Conclusion: There is no significant reduction of the incidence of vomiting in oral ondansetron group with IM ketamine procedural sedation in children.