The aim of this article is to problematise the dominant construction of 'professionalism' as created and promoted by the United Kingdom Government through policy. Like other professionals working in education, early years practitioners are subjected to a disempowering, regulatory gaze in the name of higher standards. The preoccupation with satisfying dominant and externally imposed constructions of professionalism leaves little time to engage in meaningful critiques of the status quo, and as a consequence of social engineering those working in the early years become constrained by demands for technicist practice. The discourse of rationality is deconstructed to reveal that through its dominance and perpetuation early years practitioners are regulated and controlled in their attempts to satisfy the demands for performativity and technicist practice. This article draws upon and is framed by the work of Foucault, in particular his concern with 'disciplinary technologies' that produce docile bodies as objects that yield to the discourse, and his focus upon rules that govern the discourse-in this case the discourse professionalism. The article concludes with a discussion of the vital and important role that agency plays and it is argued that practitioners are not passively shaped by social structure but that they are active in challenging, negotiating and reforming the discourses through which they are positioned and defined and therein lies the possibility for resisting the regulatory gaze. gratitude to attendees at the 'Re-thinking Professionalism in the Early Years Seminar' at London Metropolitan University, in November 2004. They willingly and enthusiastically debated the issues presented in an earlier version of this article, and thanks to their feedback I was able to refine my ideas. Finally, my thanks go to the three peer referees for their helpful comments and affirmation that 'professionalism' is a worthy focus of debate.

No abstract

No abstract

In this discussion paper, I seek to understand the complex interaction between notions of 'professionalism' and gendered identity constructions against the backdrop of increased state regulation and demands for performativity in the early years. I seek to explore the ways in which 'teacher professionalism' is constructed by government and how this transcends into a 'discourse of derision', which then becomes a subtle, yet powerful, means of controlling this occupational group. I conclude by presenting an alternative feminist conceptual framework for assessing the gendered nature of identity formation, and as an opportunity to consider the role agency can play when seeking to resist/renegotiate the rapid and powerful policy reform agenda in the early years.

No abstract