Transactional memory (TM)

No abstract

Hardware Transactional Memory (HTM) systems reflect choices from three key design dimensions: conflict detection, version management, and conflict resolution. Previously proposed HTMs represent three points in this design space: lazy conflict detection, lazy version management, committer wins (LL); eager conflict detection, lazy version management, requester wins (EL); and eager conflict detection, eager version management, and requester stalls with conservative deadlock avoidance (EE). To isolate the effects of these high-level design decisions, we develop a common framework that abstracts away differences in cache write policies, interconnects, and ISA to compare these three design points. Not surprisingly, the relative performance of these systems depends on the workload. Under light transactional loads they perform similarly, but under heavy loads they differ by up to 80%. None of the systems performs best on all of our benchmarks. We identify seven performance pathologies-interactions between workload and system that degrade performance-as the root cause of many performance differences: FRIENDLYFIRE, STARVINGWRITER, SERIALIZEDCOMMIT, FUTILESTALL, STARVIN-GELDER, RESTARTCONVOY, and DUELINGUPGRADES. We discuss when and on which systems these pathologies can occur and show that they actually manifest within TM workloads. The insight provided by these pathologies motivated four enhanced systems that often significantly reduce transactional memory overhead. Importantly, by avoiding transaction pathologies, each enhanced system performs well across our suite of benchmarks.

Nested transactional memory (TM) facilitates software composition by letting one module invoke another without either knowing whether the other uses transactions. Closed nested transactions extend isolation of an inner transaction until the toplevel transaction commits. Implementations may flatten nested transactions into the top-level one, resulting in a complete abort on conflict, or allow partial abort of inner transactions. Open nested transactions allow a committing inner transaction to immediately release isolation, which increases parallelism and expressiveness at the cost of both software and hardware complexity. This paper extends the recently-proposed flat Log-based Transactional Memory (LogTM) with nested transactions. Flat LogTM saves pre-transaction values in a log, detects conflicts with read (R) and write (W) bits per cache block, and, on abort, invokes a software handler to unroll the log. Nested LogTM supports nesting by segmenting the log into a stack of activation records and modestly replicating R/W bits. To facilitate composition with nontransactional code, such as language runtime and operating system services, we propose escape actions that allow trusted code to run outside the confines of the transactional memory system.

Hardware Transactional Memory (HTM) systems reflect choices from three key design dimensions: conflict detection, version management, and conflict resolution. Previously proposed HTMs represent three points in this design space: lazy conflict detection, lazy version management, committer wins (LL); eager conflict detection, lazy version management, requester wins (EL); and eager conflict detection, eager version management, and requester stalls with conservative deadlock avoidance (EE). To isolate the effects of these high-level design decisions, we develop a common framework that abstracts away differences in cache write policies, interconnects, and ISA to compare these three design points. Not surprisingly, the relative performance of these systems depends on the workload. Under light transactional loads they perform similarly, but under heavy loads they differ by up to 80%. None of the systems performs best on all of our benchmarks. We identify seven performance pathologies-interactions between workload and system that degrade performance-as the root cause of many performance differences: FRIENDLYFIRE, STARVINGWRITER, SERIALIZEDCOMMIT, FUTILESTALL, STARVIN-GELDER, RESTARTCONVOY, and DUELINGUPGRADES. We discuss when and on which systems these pathologies can occur and show that they actually manifest within TM workloads. The insight provided by these pathologies motivated four enhanced systems that often significantly reduce transactional memory overhead. Importantly, by avoiding transaction pathologies, each enhanced system performs well across our suite of benchmarks.