Type 1 diabetes is a condition caused by autoimmune damage of the insulinproducing b-cells of the pancreatic islets, usually leading to severe endogenous insulin deficiency. Type 1 diabetes accounts for approximately 5-10% of all cases of diabetes. Although the incidence peaks in puberty and early adulthood, new-onset type 1 diabetes occurs in all age-groups and people with type 1 diabetes live for many decades after onset of the disease, such that the overall prevalence of type 1 diabetes is higher in adults than in children, justifying our focus on type 1 diabetes in adults (1). The global prevalence of type 1 diabetes is 5.9 per 10,000 people, while the incidence has risen rapidly over the last 50 years and is currently estimated to be 15 per 100,000 people peryear(2).

Up to 50% of the people who have died from COVID-19 had metabolic and vascular disorders. Notably, there are many direct links between COVID-19 and the metabolic and endocrine systems. Thus, not only are patients with metabolic dysfunction (eg, obesity, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and diabetes) at an increased risk of developing severe COVID-19 but also infection with SARS-CoV-2 might lead to new-onset diabetes or aggravation of pre-existing metabolic disorders. In this Review, we provide an update on the mechanisms of how metabolic and endocrine disorders might predispose patients to develop severe COVID-19. Additionally, we update the practical recommendations and management of patients with COVID-19 and post-pandemic. Furthermore, we summarise new treatment options for patients with both COVID-19 and diabetes, and highlight current challenges in clinical management.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) convened a writing group to develop a consensus statement on the management of type 1 diabetes in adults. The writing group has considered the rapid development of new treatments and technologies and addressed the following topics: diagnosis, aims of management, schedule of care, diabetes self-management education and support, glucose monitoring, insulin therapy, hypoglycaemia, behavioural considerations, psychosocial care, diabetic ketoacidosis, pancreas and islet transplantation, adjunctive therapies, special populations, inpatient management and future perspectives. Although we discuss the schedule for follow-up examinations and testing, we have not included the evaluation and treatment of the chronic microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes as these are well-reviewed and discussed elsewhere. The writing group was aware of both national and international guidance on type 1 diabetes and did not seek to replicate this but rather aimed to highlight the major areas that healthcare professionals should consider when managing adults with type 1 diabetes. Though evidence-based where possible, the recommendations in the report represent the consensus opinion of the authors.

To assess the mechanisms responsible for the insulin resistance associated with both normal human pregnancy and gestational-onset diabetes, we have measured exogenous glucose disposal using sequential insulin infusions with the euglycemic glucose clamp technique and erythrocyte insulin binding. Three groups of women were studied: nonpregnant women with normal glucose tolerance (N = 7, mean age 32.9 +/- 2.1 yr), pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance (N = 5, mean age 24.8 +/- 3.5 yr), and pregnant women with gestational-onset diabetes (N = 5, mean age 34.6 +/- 2.6 yr). Despite normal plasma glucose levels obtained during a 100-g oral glucose tolerance test, plasma insulin levels were significantly elevated in the pregnant women compared with the nonpregnant control subjects, suggesting a state of insulin resistance. Insulin binding to erythrocytes was similar in all three groups (maximum specific binding being 5.0 +/- 0.6%, 5.5 +/- 1.1%, and 6.0 +/- 0.7% in nonpregnant, nondiabetic pregnant, and gestational-onset diabetic women, respectively). In vivo peripheral insulin action was measured using the euglycemic glucose clamp technique during an insulin infusion of 40 mU/m2 X min, with blood glucose clamped at a concentration of 75 mg/dl using a variable glucose infusion. Glucose infusion rates were 213 +/- 11 mg/m2 X min, 143 +/- 23 mg/m2 X min, and 57 +/- 18 mg/m2 X min in nonpregnant, nondiabetic pregnant, and gestational-onset diabetic women, respectively. This demonstrates that pregnant subjects display a state of insulin resistance, and that this appears to be more marked in gestational-onset diabetic subjects. To further define the possible mechanism of insulin resistance during pregnancy, the insulin infusion rate was increased to 240 mU/m2 X min and further euglycemic clamp measurements performed. Glucose infusion rates were 372 +/- 11 mg/m2 X min, 270 +/- 31 mg/m2 X min, and 157 +/- 26 mg/m2 X min, in nonpregnant, nondiabetic pregnant, and gestational-onset diabetic women, respectively. This demonstrates a shift to the right of the dose-response curve of insulin action and suggests that the insulin resistance of pregnancy may include a decrease in presumed "maximum" insulin responsivity. In four subjects, studies were repeated in the postpartum period, and these demonstrated that the insulin resistance of pregnancy is ameliorated shortly after delivery. These studies suggest that the insulin resistance of pregnancy results from a target cell defect in insulin action beyond the initial step of insulin binding to cellular receptors, a postreceptor (or postbinding) defect in insulin action.

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is a complex, chronic disease that is difficult to control during adolescence. This study evaluated the effects of a 6-week, family-oriented, group intervention on adolescents' metabolic control and psychosocial and family functioning. Thirty-two families were randomly assigned to one of three groups: multifamily (MF), multifamily plus parent simulation of diabetes (MF + S), and control (C). Outcome measures included glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb Al); perceptions of diabetes; estimates of youngsters' self-care; and family functioning. Adolescents in the MF + S group displayed significant decrements in Hb Al, and adolescents in both intervention groups reported more positive perceptions of a "teen-ager with diabetes" at posttreatment, relative to controls. Adolescents participating in smaller family groups demonstrated clinically significant improvements in Hb Al that were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Parent reports suggested that adolescents in the intervention groups improved their diabetes care. Findings support the use of multifamily groups plus parent simulation of diabetes as an intervention strategy for adolescents with IDDM.