To compare patching and atropine as treatments for moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 419 children younger than 7 years with amblyopia and visual acuity in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 were assigned to receive either patching or atropine at 47 clinical sites. Main Outcome Measure: Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye and sound eye after 6 months. Results: Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye improved in both groups (improvement from baseline to 6 months was 3.16 lines in the patching group and 2.84 lines in the atropine group). Improvement was initially faster in the patching group, but after 6 months, the difference in visual acuity between treatment groups was small and clinically inconsequential (mean difference at 6 months, 0.034 logMAR units; 95% confidence interval, 0.005-0.064 logMAR units). The 6-month acuity was 20/30 or better in the amblyopic eye and/or improved from baseline by 3 or more lines in 79% of the patching group and 74% of the atropine group. Both treatments were well tolerated, although atropine had a slightly higher degree of acceptability on a parental questionnaire. More patients in the atropine group than in the patching group had reduced acuity in the sound eye at 6 months, but this did not persist with further follow-up. Conclusion: Atropine and patching produce improvement of similar magnitude, and both are appropriate modalities for the initial treatment of moderate amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years.

INTRODUCTION This pilot study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intermittent occlusion therapy (IO-Therapy) using liquid crystal glasses versus continuous occlusion therapy using traditional adhesive patches for treating amblyopia. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial. Children 3–8 years of age with previously untreated, moderate, unilateral amblyopia (visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/100 in the amblyopic eye) were enrolled. Amblyopia was associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both. All subjects had worn optimal refractive correction (if needed) for at least 12 weeks without improvement. Subjects were randomized into two treatment groups: a 4-hour IO-Therapy Group with liquid crystal glasses (Amblyz™), set at 30-second opaque/transparent intervals (occluded 50% of wear time) or a 2-hour continuous Patching Group (occluded 100% of wear time). For each patient, visual acuity was measured with the ATS-HOTV method before and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS At the conclusion of the first 12 week-treatment interval, data from 34 patients were available for analysis. Amblyopic eye visual acuity improvement from baseline was 0.15±0.12 (95% CI=0.09 to 0.15) logMAR in the IO-Therapy Group (N=19) and 0.15±0.11 (95% CI=0.1 to 0.15) logMAR in the Patching Group (N=15). Improvements in both groups were significant. The difference between groups was not statistically significant (P=0.73). No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, IO-Therapy with Amblyz liquid crystal glasses is not inferior to adhesive patching and is a promising alternative treatment for children 3–8 years of age with moderate amblyopia. A larger randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm results in future.

No abstract

No abstract