In ungauged watersheds, the estimation of the time of concentration (Tc) is always a challenging task due to the intrinsic uncertainty involved when making assumptions. Given that Tc is one of the main inputs in a hydrological analysis for the design of hydraulic structures for stormwater management, ten equations (including one proposed in several local studies) and two Tc methodologies (overland flow time plus channel flow time) were used to compute the Tc in fifteen urban ungauged watersheds, located in Cartagena de Indias (Colombia), with different area sizes and slopes to statistically assess their performance against the value obtained via the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) velocity method (assumed to be the true value). According to the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index, none of the equations proved to be reliable in all watersheds as only four equations predicted the Tc value in 53% of the cases. In addition, based on the percent bias, all equations tended to significantly over- or underestimate the Tc, which affects the quantification of the runoff volume necessary for, among others, the implementation of best management practices for watershed management (e.g., conventional and/or sustainable drainage system design), flood-prone area delineation and flood risk analyses, urban planning, and stream restoration.
A pilot submerged membrane bioreactor coupled with biological nutrient removal was used to treat the primary effluent at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Long-term experiments were conducted by varying hydraulic retention time from 6 to 8 hours and solids retention time from 20 to 50 days, respectively. The performance was assessed by monitoring key wastewater parameters, including chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration in individual anoxic, anaerobic, aerobic, and membrane separation zones. Results showed that the tested system can consistently achieve COD, nitrogen, and phosphorus removal efficiencies at 80 to 98%, 70 to 93%, and 89 to 98%, respectively. Effluent COD remained low as a result of efficient solid retention, even though there was great variation in influent quality. However, total nitrogen increased proportionally with influent concentration. At a 50-day solids retention time, higher COD and nitrogen oxides specific utilization rates in the anoxic zone resulted in a high production of nitrogen oxides in the subsequent aerobic zone. Water Environ. Res., 78, 538 (2006).
In the Colombian Caribbean region, there are few studies that evaluated the behavior of one of the most commonly used variables in hydrological analyses: the maximum daily rainfall (Pmax-24h). In this study, multiannual Pmax-24h time series from 19 rain gauges, located within the department of Atlántico, were analyzed to (a) determine possible increasing/decreasing trends over time, (b) identify regions with homogeneous behavior of Pmax-24h, (c) assess whether the time series are better suited under either a stationary or non-stationary frequency analysis, (d) generate isohyetal maps under stationary, non-stationary, and mixed conditions, and (e) evaluate the isohyetal maps by means of the calculation of areal rainfall (Pareal) in nine watersheds. In spite of the presence of both increasing and decreasing trends, only the Puerto Giraldo rain gauge showed a significant decreasing trend. Also, three regions (east, central, and west) with similar Pmax-24h behavior were identified. According to the Akaike information criterion test, 79% of the rain gauges showed better fit under stationary conditions. Finally, statistical analysis revealed that, under stationary conditions, the errors in the calculation of Pareal were more frequent, while the magnitude of the errors was larger under non-stationary conditions, especially in the central–south region.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.