MMP-7 was observed only in cancer cells, and MT1-MMP in both tumoral tissue and stroma. MMP-7 expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.03; RR = 3.2). MT1-MMP showed a significant association with TIMP-2 (in N+ cases) and p53 expression (P = 0.01). MMP-7 and MT1-MMP displayed a survival relevance, and in multivariate analysis they were independent prognostic indicators, particularly in neck node-positive cases.
Functional outcomes at 12 months were a secondary outcome of the randomized DECRA trial of early decompressive craniectomy for severe diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI) and refractory intracranial hypertension. In the DECRA trial, patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to either early decompressive craniectomy or intensive medical therapies (standard care). We conducted planned secondary analyses of the DECRA trial outcomes at 6 and 12 months, including all 155 patients. We measured functional outcome using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). We used ordered logistic regression, and dichotomized the GOS-E using logistic regression, to assess outcomes in patients overall and in survivors. We adjusted analyses for injury severity using the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) model. At 12 months, the odds ratio (OR) for worse functional outcomes in the craniectomy group (OR 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-2.93; p = 0.07) was no longer significant. Unfavorable functional outcomes after craniectomy were 11% higher (59% compared with 48%), but were not significantly different from standard care (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 0.84-2.99; p = 0.16). Among survivors after craniectomy, there were fewer good (OR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12-0.91; p = 0.03) and more vegetative (OR 5.12; 95% CI: 1.04-25.2; p = 0.04) outcomes. Similar outcomes in survivors were found at 6 months after injury. Vegetative (OR 5.85; 95% CI: 1.21-28.30; p = 0.03) and severely disabled outcomes (OR 2.49; 95% CI: 1.21-5.11; p = 0.01) were increased. Twelve months after severe diffuse TBI and early refractory intracranial hypertension, decompressive craniectomy did not improve outcomes and increased vegetative survivors.
LBA4018 Background: The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has proven efficacy and safety in colorectal and breast cancer. Phase II data in AGC suggested that XP would show comparable efficacy to a standard FP regimen, with potential safety and convenience advantages. This phase III study evaluated XP vs. FP in first-line AGC. Methods: Pts with previously untreated measurable AGC received either oral capecitabine (1000mg/m2 bid d1–14) + cisplatin (80mg/m2 i.v. d1) q3w (XP arm) or 5-FU (800mg/m2/d continuous infusion, d1–5) + cisplatin (80mg/m2 i.v. d1) q3w (FP arm). XP requires 1 day per 3 weeks in hospital; FP requires 5 days. Pts were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: non-inferiority (NI) in progression-free survival (PFS), defined as upper limit of 95% CI of hazard ratio (HR) <1.4 (first test) and <1.25 (second test). Results: From Apr 03 to Jan 05, 316 pts were enrolled in 46 centers/13 countries. Arms were well balanced: median age (years, range) XP (56, 26–74), FP (56, 22–73); median Karnofsky PS 80 (range 70–100) in both arms; male/female (%): XP (64/36) FP (69/31). Median no. of cycles was 5 (XP and FP). Median follow-up is 22.1 months. Primary endpoint was met: HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–1.04). XP was superior to FP in terms of overall response rate (ORR, RECIST). Efficacy is presented in the table. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (XP vs. FP) were: neutropenia (16 vs. 19%), vomiting (7 vs. 9%), stomatitis (2 vs. 7%), diarrhea (5 vs. 5%), and anemia (5 vs. 3%). Other grade 3/4 events occurred in <5% of pts. The rate of all-grade hand-foot syndrome was low (22 vs. 4%). Conclusions: XP showed highly significant non-inferiority for PFS and significant superiority for ORR vs. FP with similar safety. These findings suggest that capecitabine should become the fluoropyrimidine of choice for AGC, given the efficacy, reduced hospitalization time and simplified regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.