Resistance to RAF- and MEK-targeted therapy is a major clinical challenge1–4. RAF and MEK inhibitors are initially but only transiently effective in some but not all patients with BRAF gene mutation and are largely ineffective in those with RAS gene mutation because of resistance5–14. Through a genetic screen in BRAF-mutant tumor cells, we show that the Hippo pathway effector YAP (encoded by YAP1) acts as a parallel survival input to promote resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitor therapy. Combined YAP and RAF or MEK inhibition was synthetically lethal not only in several BRAF-mutant tumor types but also in RAS-mutant tumors. Increased YAP in tumors harboring BRAF V600E was a biomarker of worse initial response to RAF and MEK inhibition in patients, establishing the clinical relevance of our findings. Our data identify YAP as a new mechanism of resistance to RAF- and MEK-targeted therapy. The findings unveil the synthetic lethality of combined suppression of YAP and RAF or MEK as a promising strategy to enhance treatment response and patient survival.

LBA1006 Background: Taselisib, a potent, selective PI3K inhibitor, has enhanced activity in PIK3CA-MUT BC cell lines and confirmed partial responses in PIK3CA-MUT BC as a single-agent or with FULV. We assessed taselisib + FULV in pts with ER-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-MUT locally advanced or MBC. Methods: SANDPIPER (NCT02340221) is a double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, randomized, phase III study. Postmenopausal pts with disease recurrence or progression during or after an aromatase inhibitor were randomized 2:1 to receive taselisib (4 mg oral, qd) or PBO + FULV (500 mg). Stratification factors were: visceral disease, endocrine sensitivity, and geographic region. Pts with PIK3CA-MUT tumors, assessed by central cobas PIK3CA Mutation Test, were randomized separately from non-MUT tumors. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) in pts with PIK3CA-MUT tumors. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of objective response (DoR), PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR-PFS), and safety. Results: 516 pts were randomized in the PIK3CA-MUT intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Efficacy is shown in the Table. Taselisib + FULV significantly improved INV-PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70) as confirmed by BICR-PFS (HR 0.66). OS is immature. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; preferred terms) in the taselisib + FULV arm in safety-evaluable pts who received ≥ 1 dose of treatment were diarrhea (12%), hyperglycemia (10%), colitis (3%), and stomatitis (2%). AEs led to more taselisib discontinuations (17% v 2%) and dose reductions (37% v 2%), v PBO. Conclusions: Taselisib + FULV significantly improved INV-PFS, v PBO + FULV, in pts with ER-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-MUT locally advanced or MBC. The safety profile is largely consistent with previous studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02340221. [Table: see text]

No abstract

Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate with a HER2 antibody, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker, and a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) is an open-label, international, multicenter, phase 2 study of T-DXd in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and supported regulatory approval in the US and Japan. Updated longer-term safety and efficacy results are presented here. Methods All patients were required to have MBC that progressed on or after T-DM1. 253 patients were enrolled and 184 received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg, representing the primary analysis set. The primary endpoint was ORR. Additional endpoints included duration of response, PFS, and OS. Results Patients had received a median of 6 previous lines of treatment for MBC. In this updated data cutoff (8 June 2020) compared to the prior data cutoff (1 Aug 2019), median duration of follow-up has increased from 11.1 to 20.5 mo; 37 patients (20.1%) remain on treatment. Confirmed ORR was 61.4% (12 CRs) with a median duration of response of 20.8 mo; the disease control rate was 97.3% (95% CI, 93.8-99.1). The updated mPFS was 19.4 mo (95% CI, 14.1 mo-NE). Estimated OS was 85% (95% CI, 79%-90%) at 12 months and 74% (95% CI, 67%-80%) at 18 months. The preliminary mOS is 24.6 mo (estimated at 35% maturity with only 17 patients at risk at 24 months). The safety profile of T-DXd was similar as that previously reported; with an additional 9 mo follow-up, only 3 new cases of T-DXd-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) were reported. Results are summarized in the table below. Conclusion Consistent with prior results, T-DXd demonstrated high rates of durable responses in a heavily pretreated population of patients with MBC. From this single-arm, phase 2 study, the PFS and immature OS results are encouraging; these endpoints will be further evaluated in the ongoing randomized controlled studies of T-DXd. For patients who remained on treatment for this longer duration (double that of the previous report), the rate of discontinuation or ILD did not notably increase. Continued attention to pulmonary symptoms and careful monitoring is warranted. Updated Results for DESTINY-Breast011 Aug 2019 datacut8 Jun 2020 datacutPatients remaining on treatment, n/N (%)79/184 (42.9%)37/184 (20.1%)Median duration of follow-up11.1 months20.5 monthsORR60.9%61.4%CR6.0%6.5%PR54.9%54.9%SD36.4%35.9%Duration of response, median (95% CI)14.8 months (13.8-16.9)20.8 months (15.0-NE)PFS, median (95% CI)16.4 months (12.7-NE)19.4 months (14.1-NE)OSMedian (95% CI)NE (NE-NE)24.6 months (23.1-NE)Point estimate at 12 mo (95% CI)86.2% (79.8-90.7)85% (79-90)Point estimate at 18 mo (95% CI)–74% (67-80)SafetyPatients with a TEAE, n (%)183 (99.5%)183 (99.5%)Grade ≥3105 (57.1%)113 (61.4%)Associated with discontinuation28 (15.2%)34 (18.5%)Associated with death10 (5.4%)10 (5.4%)Drug-related ILD per ILD adjudication committeea25 (13.6%)28 (15.2%)Grade 5 drug-related ILD per ILD adjudication committee4 (2.2%)5 (2.7%)a1 grade 1 and 1 grade 3 event are pending adjudication and are not included. Citation Format: Shanu Modi, Cristina Saura, Toshinari Yamashita, Yeon Hee Park, Sung-Bae Kim, Kenji Tamura, Fabrice Andre, Hiroji Iwata, Yoshinori Ito, Junji Tsurutani, Joohyuk Sohn, Neelima Denduluri, Christophe Perrin, Kenjiro Aogi, Eriko Tokunaga, Seock-Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Sara A Hurvitz, Javier Cortes, Caleb Lee, Yali Liu, Lin Zhang, Javad Shahidi, Antoine Yver, Jose Baselga, Ian E Krop. Updated results from DESTINY-breast01, a phase 2 trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd ) in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-06.

1000 Background: Pretreated HER2+ MBC lacks a defined standard of care, although T is commonly used. M has similar HER2 binding and antiproliferative effects as T. By contrast, M’s Fc region is engineered to increase affinity for both alleles of the activating Fc receptor (FcR), CD16A, and decrease affinity for the inhibitory FcR, CD32B. The low affinity CD16A-158F allele (~85% of population) has been associated with diminished clinical response to T. In a Phase 1 trial, M demonstrated acceptable safety, anti-tumor activity, and evidence of HER2-specific antibody and T-cell responses. Methods: SOPHIA (NCT02492711), a randomized, open-label P3 trial, enrolled pts with HER2+ MBC after pertuzumab and 1–3 lines of prior Tx for MBC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to M (15 mg/kg IV q3w + C) or T (6 [8 for loading dose] mg/kg IV q3w + C), stratified by met sites (≤2, > 2), lines of Tx for met disease (≤2, > 2), and C choice (standard dose capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Primary endpoints are central blinded PFS and OS, assessed sequentially using the stratified log-rank test. Objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. 257 PFS events were required to provide 90% power to show PFS superiority at 2-sided α = 0.05. Results: Intent-to-treat analysis (536 pts: M 266; T 270) occurred after 265 PFS events. M prolonged PFS over T (median 5.8 vs 4.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98; P= 0.033). Treatment effects were more pronounced in pts with CD16A genotypes containing a 158F allele (median PFS 6.9 vs 5.1 mo, HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90; P= 0.005). In 524 pts with baseline measurable disease (M 262; T 262), ORR was higher with M (22%; 95% CI, 17.3-27.7%) vs T (16%; 95% CI 11.8-21.0%). Safety profiles were comparable in 529 pts who received study therapy. Grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs occurred in 138 (52%) and 39 (15%) vs 128 (48%) and 46 (17%) pts on M vs T, respectively. PFS data cutoff: 10/10/18. Conclusions: In combination with chemotherapy in pretreated HER2+ MBC, M improves PFS over T with comparable safety. CD16A genotyping suggests a differential benefit in patients with a 158F allele. OS data are maturing. Clinical trial information: NCT02492711.

Adaptive responses have been demonstrated to limit activity to targeted therapies. Saei et al. show that loss of USP28/FBW7-mediated BRAF degradation is observed in a proportion of melanoma patients and can be responsible for resistance through upregulation of MAPK signaling pathway.

No abstract

No abstract