Most of the transcription factors (TFs) responsible for controlling seed development are not yet known. To identify TF genes expressed at specific stages of seed development, including those unique to seeds, we used Affymetrix GeneChips to profile Arabidopsis genes active in seeds from fertilization through maturation and at other times of the plant life cycle. Seed gene sets were compared with those expressed in prefertilization ovules, germinating seedlings, and leaves, roots, stems, and floral buds of the mature plant. Most genes active in seeds are shared by all stages of seed development, although significant quantitative changes in gene activity occur. Each stage of seed development has a small gene set that is either specific at the level of the GeneChip or up-regulated with respect to genes active at other stages, including those that encode TFs. We identified 289 seed-specific genes, including 48 that encode TFs. Seven of the seed-specific TF genes are known regulators of seed development and include the LEAFY COTYLEDON ( LEC ) genes LEC1, LEC1-LIKE, LEC2 , and FUS3 . The rest represent different classes of TFs with unknown roles in seed development. Promoter-β -glucuronidase ( GUS ) fusion experiments and seed mRNA localization GeneChip datasets showed that the seed-specific TF genes are active in different compartments and tissues of the seed at unique times of development. Collectively, these seed-specific TF genes should facilitate the identification of regulatory networks that are important for programming seed development.

No abstract

Expression of the Caenorhabditis elegans Hox gene lin-39 begins in the embryo and continues in multiple larval cells, including the P cell lineages that generate ventral cord neurons (VCNs) and vulval precursor cells (VPCs). lin-39 is regulated by several factors and by Wnt and Ras signaling pathways; however, no cis-acting sites mediating lin-39 regulation have been identified. Here, we describe three elements controlling lin-39 expression: a 338-bp upstream fragment that directs embryonic expression in P5-P8 and their descendants in the larva, a 247-bp intronic region sufficient for VCN expression, and a 1.3-kb upstream cis-regulatory module that drives expression in the VPC P6.p in a Ras-dependent manner. Three trans-acting factors regulate expression via the 1.3-kb element. A single binding site for the ETS factor LIN-1 mediates repression in VPCs other than P6.p; however, loss of LIN-1 decreases expression in P6.p. Therefore, LIN-1 acts both negatively and positively on lin-39 in different VPCs. The Forkhead domain protein LIN-31 also acts positively on lin-39 in P6.p via this module. Finally, LIN-39 itself binds to this element, suggesting that LIN-39 autoregulates its expression in P6.p. Therefore, we have begun to unravel the cis-acting sites regulating lin-39 Hox gene expression and have shown that lin-39 is a direct target of the Ras pathway acting via LIN-1 and LIN-31.

Extracellular signaling pathways and transcriptional regulatory networks function during development to specify metazoan cell fates. During Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development, the specification of three vulval precursor cells (VPCs) requires the activity of Wnt, Notch, and Ras signaling pathways, and function of the Hox gene lin-39. LIN-39 protein levels are regulated in the VPCs by both Wnt and Ras signaling. In particular, activation of Ras signaling leads to an increase in LIN-39 protein in P6.p at the time of VPC fate specification. We wish to understand the regulation of lin-39 by these pathways. We first show that LIN-39 is a target for MAP kinase in vitro, suggesting that the Ras-dependent LIN-39 upregulation could be mediated post-translationally. To test this idea, we created transcriptional and translational lin-39::GFP fusions that include the entire lin-39 genomic region, allowing observation of lin-39 expression in live animals. The reporters express GFP in most, if not all, sites of expression previously observed by LIN-39 antibody staining. We used these constructs to show that at the time of vulval induction both lin-39::GFP reporters are upregulated in P6.p, indicating that the accumulation of high levels of LIN-39 protein detected previously corresponds to transcriptional upregulation of lin-39 expression. This transcriptional upregulation of lin-39 is dependent on Ras signaling. We tested the requirement for several transcription factors acting downstream of Ras signaling in the VPCs, and found that P6.p upregulation requires the transcription factors LIN-1 and LIN-25, but appears to be independent of LIN-31, SEM-4, EOR-1 and EOR-2.Finally, we found that when the Wnt pathway is over activated, expression from the transcriptional lin-39::GFP increases, suggesting that the Wnt pathway also regulates lin-39 at the transcriptional level.

SummaryTransgenic potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with either increased (sense transformants) or reduced (antisense transformants) phytochrome A (phyA) levels were used, in combination with speci®c light treatments, to investigate the involvement of phyA in the perception of signals that entrain the circadian clock. Far-red or far-red plus red light treatments given during the night reset the circadian rhythm of leaf movements in wild-type plants and phyA over-expressors, but had little effect in phyA underexpressors. Far-red light was also able to reset the rhythm of leaf movement in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana but was not effective in mutants without phyA. Blue light was necessary to reset the rhythm in phyA-de®cient potato plants. Resetting of the rhythm by far-red plus red light was only slightly affected in transgenic plants with reduced levels of phytochrome B. The production of tubers was delayed by day extensions with far-red plus red light, but this effect was reduced in transgenic lines de®cient in phyA. We conclude that phyA is involved in resetting the circadian clock controlling leaf movements and in photoperiod sensing in light-grown potato plants.