Background
Port Wine Stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation. Although multiple treatments are required, the gold standard treatment for PWS is Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL). Given its anti‐angiogenic effects, sirolimus can be considered as an adjuvant to PDL in PWS.
Aim
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical sirolimus (Rapamycin) 0.2% cream as adjuvant therapy for PDL for PWS.
Methods
In this randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial, 15 patients with PWS were enrolled. Each lesion was divided into upper and lower parts, and each part was assigned randomly to receive PDL (4 sessions, 2 months apart) plus sirolimus vs PDL and placebo. The response was evaluated using colorimetry, investigator global assessment (IGA), and patient global assessment (PGA) every two months for eight continuous months.
Results
According to the colorimetric analysis, medial and lateral sides of the treatment and placebo parts did not differ significantly (both P‐value > .05). However, according to PGA and IGA, there was a significant difference in favor of sirolimus (P‐values = .041 and .039, respectively). Itching and dryness (86.7%), contact dermatitis (20%) were the most common adverse effects in the sirolimus group, while none of them were observed in placebo.
Conclusion
Although the improvement was significant subjectively, topical sirolimus 0.2% as an adjuvant to PDL does not appear to improve PWS erythema using calorimetric assessment.
Introduction: The aim of this study is evaluation of chin deformities and their role in rhinoplasty cosmetic surgery outcomes via photogrammetry of chin. Materials and Methods: The study is a cross sectional one. All photos of rhinoplasty surgery candidates of three hospitals (Amir Aalam, Imam Khomeini and Razi of Tehran) which were taken in standard lateral position via SLR cameras were assessed through Adobe Photoshop CS, in order to determine four different aesthetic measurements. Except for excluded photos due to our excluding criteria or technical problems, all photographs were evaluated carefully. Results: 144 photos of patients were enrolled. The oldness of patients ranges between below 20 up to above; 65.99 patients were female (68.8%) and 45 were male. 73 patients (50.7%) had an abnormal silver condition. Moreover 9 patients (6.3%) with abnormal nasomental, 124 patients with abnormal status of Gonzalez-Ulloa (93.8%), 63 patients (43.8%) with unusual status of Ricketts' E line/upper and 49 patients (34%) with abnormal Ricketts' E line/lower status can be demonstrated. Discussion: Performing a photogrammetric study for candidates of cosmetic rhinoplasty also a chin examination as a mandatory preoperative assessment seems to be essential. Due to the lack of studies in this field, more studies are necessary.
Background Scars are inevitable results of surgical procedures, and prevention of them is still a major problem in the field of cosmetic surgery. Although various studies have been performed on botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injection for the prevention of hypertrophic scars, the exact mechanism remains unclear. Methods This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study was performed on 19 patients who underwent mammoplasty and abdominoplasty surgery in Razi Hospital from October 2018 to December 2019. Single session of treatment was performed, where XEOMIN was allocated to one half of the scar and 0.9% saline to the control half. 3 and 6 months later, scars were assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). Results In total, 19 patients who completed the study were analyzed. mSBSES at the third month (P value \ 0.001; 3.34 ± 1.59 vs 1.5 ± 1.36) and the sixth month (P value \ 0.001; 4.89 ± 1.83 vs 2.39 ± 1.82) showed a significant difference between the treatment and control groups. In the subset analysis, there was significant difference between BoNT-A and control in all four items including width, height, color, and scar visibility at months 3 and 6, and the BoNT-A-treated sides had higher scores in all items. Conclusion BoNT-A has a significant effect on scar prevention due to mammoplasty and abdominoplasty compared to placebo and results in decreased erythema, height, width and reduces incision line visibility. Moreover, its effect increases significantly over time from months 3 to 6.
The level of arginase activity in lesions of patients with acute and chronic CL was higher than the skin of healthy controls. The highest level of arginase activity was observed in PMNs from patients with chronic CL. This suggests that the high level of arginase activity in PMNs of patients with chronic CL may contribute to the chronicity.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new topical skin ointment with natural ingredients (aloe vera, honey, and peppermint) for dressing skin graft donor sites.
DESIGN
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.
PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION
Researchers enrolled patients who were referred for split-thickness skin graft after burns or surgical wounds on the scalp or face area. For each patient, a thin layer of skin (depth, 0.04 mm; approximate size, less than 15 × 7 cm) was harvested from the thigh by a plastic surgeon with an electric or manual dermatome. The donor sites were divided and randomized to receive either natural ointment or petroleum jelly as a topical agent to dressing. Topical agents were applied on donor site wounds on days 0, 4, 7, and 14.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Wound size, pain, erythema, pruritus, patient discomfort, complications, and physician satisfaction were evaluated at each visit.
MAIN RESULTS
Among 28 patients, there was no significant difference between the two treatment agents regarding the rate of wound healing (P = .415), pain (P = .081), pruritus (P = .527), and patient discomfort (P = .616). The ointment was superior to petroleum jelly in reducing wound erythema (P = .001) and was associated with significantly better treatment satisfaction (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
The natural topical ointment investigated in this study may be an acceptable alternative to petroleum jelly in caring for split-thickness donor skin graft donor site wounds to effectively promote wound healing, prevent infection and scarring, reduce pain, and comfort the patient.
Background:
Bleeding during rhinoplasty surgery has a negative effect on the quality of surgery; so, it is important to reduce bleeding during rhinoplasty. We aimed to evaluate the effect of injectable tranexamic acid (TXA) and nasal spray of desmopressin (DDAVP) on reduction in intraoperative bleeding and ecchymosis after open rhinoplasty.
Methods:
In a Randomized Clinical Trial ( RCT) prepared since 2020 to 2021 in Razi Hospital and Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran on 42 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty were divided into three groups. In the first group, TXA was injected one hour before surgery at a dose of 10 mg / kg with a placebo inhalation spray. In the second group, DDAVP was administered as a nasal spray at a dose of 40 mcg with a placebo injection. The third group received a placebo spray and placebo injection. All required data were gathered and analyzed.
Results:
In TXA group and DDAVP groups, the volume of bleeding during surgery significantly (
P
=0.022) decreased compared to placebo group, also, the quality of the surgical field and the surgeon’s satisfaction significantly (
P
=0.007) improved compared to the placebo group but not with each other. Unlike placebo group, there were no reports of postoperative bleeding in the TXA and DDAVP groups. Duration of surgery, ecchymosis on the day after surgery and coagulation tests before and after surgery were not significantly different in three groups.
Conclusion:
Use of DDAVP and TXA can both reduce the amount of bleeding during surgery and postoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty and improve the quality of the surgical field and the surgeon ‘s satisfaction during surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.