Although, WAG has been studied and implemented widely for hydrocarbon recovery improvement, still there are some uncertainties regarding flow dynamics in the three-phase region. One of the most important uncertainty areas is modeling of three phase relative permeability in this region. Commercial simulators by using conventional three phase models cannot capture all the features and mechanisms behind the three phase flow. Hysteresis is one of the phenomenons, which is still remained controversial in three phase relative permeability models. Some of the current relative permeability models have accounted for this phenomenon and in others, hysteresis effect is lacking. Two phase models usually fail to predict the actual behavior of the hysteresis in three phase flow. Some of the three phase models also take in to account the features of hysteresis but not all of them. In the simulation process of water alternating gas, hysteresis modeling is a corner stone of the workflow. If this work step is not done properly, the results of the simulation study may not necessarily capture different aspects of the WAG injection scenario and the results could be mis-leading affecting the business decision.In this study, first an extensive parametric paper review and literature survey has been done on hysteretic two and three phase relative permeability models following by a comparative analysis. Parametric investigation is carried out and the advantages and disadvantages of the models are discussed. The model predictions versus selected experimental data are shown and the discrepancies are highlighted. The onset point to improve the model prediction is declared and finally to show the hysteresis effect on oil recovery a simulation case is done using a synthetic sector model.The discussion in this study show that by properly modeling the WAG process and taking into account the hysteresis phenomenon, the robustness of the results on incremental hydrocarbon recovery by WAG process can be significantly improved. It can be concluded that the simulation results using the commercial simulator can be mis-leading in term of the WAG injection performance if hysteresis modeling is not properly done and applied.
The success of the hydrocarbon recovery improvement via Water Alternative Gas injection process is closely related to the microscopic displacement and macroscopic sweep efficiency. Effectiveness of the successive displacements by water and gas injections, maximizing the three phase zones by optimum force balancing in the reservoir, WAG injection cycle, double displacement and film drainage process are among the important parameters that affect the sweep and displacement efficiency in WAG process. Water and gas injection scheme play an important role in optimization of these parameters. Different schemes of WAG injection have been reported in open literature including gas injection up dip, water injection down dip and vice versa.In this paper, the efficiency of various WAG injection schemes toward improvement of the above important parameters will be presented. Detailed theoretical investigation and simulation study are conducted. A new injection scheme is proposed. In the proposed methodology, water is injected from down dip and gas is injected from up dip in the first cycle. In the second cycle, gas is injected from down dip and water is injected from up dip. Water and gas injection location will alternatively change in each cycle of injection. Different design parameters are considered and studied including mobility ratio between water and oil phases, location of the water and the gas injectors, injection rate, WAG injection cycle. The results show that the proposed methodology has significant improvement on the displacement efficiency and three phase zone size and hence yield higher hydrocarbon recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.