Early initiation of ECU may not alter the disease process enough to restore organ function, but it may prolong survival.

Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is one of the leading causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has shown promise in managing GVHD. However, cyclophosphamide has known cardiac toxicities and few studies have evaluated the cardiac toxicities that arise following PTCy. Here, we completed a retrospective analysis of matched alloHCT patients at our institution who received PTCy or non-PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, with the goal of determining the incidence of cardiac toxicities up to 100 days after alloHCT. We included 585 patients in our analysis and found that 38 patients (6.5%) experienced cardiac toxicities after alloHCT. The toxicities observed included arrhythmias (n=21), heart failure (n=14), pericardial effusions (n=10), and myocardial infarction or ischemia (n=7). Patients who received PTCy had a 7.4% incidence of cardiac toxicities, while non-PTCy patients had an incidence of 5.8% (p=0.4). We found that age > 55 years (p=0.02), history of hypertension (p=0.01), arrhythmia (p=0.003), diabetes (p=0.04), and cardiac comorbidities (p<0.001) were significant predictors of cardiac toxicity, while none of the preparative and GVHD prophylaxis regimens used were predictive of cardiac toxicity. From these findings, we proposed the use of a Cardiac Risk Stratification Score to quantify the risk of cardiac toxicity following alloHCT and found that a higher score correlated with cardiac toxicity incidence. Furthermore, the development of cardiac toxicity was associated with worse 1-yr overall survival (OS) and NRM while the use of PTCy was associated with improvements in 1-year OS and NRM rates.

Patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis undergoing peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell (PBSC) mobilization for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) can experience significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to characterize the adverse events and identify prognostic factors associated with the development of morbidity and mortality in patients with AL amyloidosis who had begun PBSC mobilization for auto-HCT. A retrospective study was performed in 101 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent PBSC mobilization for auto-HCT between January 2006 and December 2013. A composite primary endpoint of morbidity and mortality during PBSC mobilization was used. Forty-one patients (41%) experienced at least 1 adverse event, including 4 deaths during PBSC mobilization. Adverse events included in this composite endpoint were cardiac events, thromboembolic events, bleeding events, unplanned hospitalization, weight gain >2% necessitating diuretic intervention, and death. Low serum albumin levels, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and increased interventricular septal thickness were significantly associated with the composite primary endpoint (P = .024, .001, and .006, respectively). The median progression-free survival from the start of PBSC mobilization was 4.7 years, and the median overall survival was 6.5 years. In general, PBSC mobilization is associated with minimal complications, but patients with AL amyloidosis can experience more frequent and severe complications, such as volume overload and weight gain. Careful patient selection is warranted in patients with AL amyloidosis before proceeding to PBSC mobilization and auto-HCT.

National guidelines recommend antimicrobial prophylaxis for allogeneic stem cell transplant patients during the pre-engraftment period because of increased infection risk during neutropenia. Fluoroquinolones have demonstrated lower rates of bacteremias and incidence of neutropenic fever, but there is limited evidence in the use of alternative antibacterials such as cefpodoxime. The primary objective of this study is to compare the rates of antibiotic prophylaxis failure between levofloxacin and cefpodoxime in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Secondary objectives include comparing and characterizing number and type of infections, mortality at day 100 posttransplant, and hospitalizations for infectious causes in the first 100 days of transplant. This is a single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched related and matched unrelated donors and antibacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin or cefpodoxime from January 1, 2011, to October 1, 2014. A total of 142 patients were evaluated (71 levofloxacin, 71 cefpodoxime). Both levofloxacin and cefpodoxime groups had similar rates of neutropenic fever and antibiotic prophylaxis failure (58% versus 58%, P = NS). There were similar incidences of Clostridioides difficile and Multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections among both levofloxacin and cefpodoxime groups. Rates of infections, hospitalizations, and mortality in the first 100 days were similar among both groups. Cefpodoxime can be used as an alternative to levofloxacin for antibiotic prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients.Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT); however, because of increased risks of infection and relapse, this use has not translated into a significant improvement in post-transplant survival. The goal of this single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was to quantify the incidence of viral reactivation and viral end-organ disease (EOD) within the first 100 days after MUD HCT with ATG-based conditioning compared with MRD HCT without ATG. Fifty-nine adult patients underwent ATGbased MUD HCT compared with 64 patients receiving MRD HCT without ATG. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was the most frequent event in both groups (65% MUD versus 61% MRD), followed by BK virus reactivation (26% versus 24%) and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (20% versus 9%). A higher percentage of MUD patients experienced viral EOD by day +100 when compared with MRD patients (34% versus 16%, P = .022). This was most notable for EOD involving BK virus (15% versus 6%, P = .14) and Epstein-Barr virus (7% versus 0%, P = .050). Correspondingly, more patients in the MUD group experienced virus-related complications, including hospitalization (24% versus 3%, P < .001), intensive care unit admission (10% versus 6%, P = .19), and mortality (8% versus 4%, P = .44). There were no significant differences in either relapse-free survival (RFS; 62% versus 78%, P = .07) or overall survival (OS; 72% versus 86%, P = .07) at 6 months post-HCT. However, when using the final time point of 21 months in the MUD/ATG group and 23 months in the MRD/no ATG group, MUD patients who received ATG had inferior survival (OS: 27% versus 77%, P = .009; RFS: 40% versus 59%, P = .042). Our results add to and further quantify the infectious risks associated with the use of ATG in MUD transplants and promote the implementation of more intensive preemptive viral monitoring practices in patients receiving ATG-based MUD transplants. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.