Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for children and adults with malignant and non-malignant diseases. Despite increasing survival rates, long-term morbidity following HCT is substantial. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a serious cause of morbidity, yet little is known about neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. To address this gap, collaborative efforts of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation undertook an expert review of neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. In this review, we define what constitutes neurocognitive dysfunction, characterize its risk factors and sequelae, describe tools and methods to assess neurocognitive function in HCT recipients, and discuss possible interventions for HCT patients with this condition. This review aims to help clinicians understand the scope of this health-related problem, highlight its impact on well-being of survivors, and to help determine factors that may improve identification of patients at risk for declines in cognitive functioning after HCT. In particular, we review strategies for preventing and treating neurocognitive dysfunction in HCT patients. Lastly, we highlight the need for well-designed studies to develop and test interventions aimed at preventing and improving neurocognitive dysfunction and its sequelae following HCT.
For children receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs), the toxicity of the conditioning regimen and graft failure remain challenges. We previously reported that targeted i.v. busulfan, fludarabine, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) decreased toxicity but had a graft failure rate of 21%. To improve the engraftment rate, we replaced ATG with alemtuzumab, a monoclonal Ab targeting CD52. Thirty-five children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases were enrolled in this phase II prospective study. Twelve children had HLA-matched related donors (MRDs), 16 had 10 of 10, and 7 had 9 of 10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs). Thirty-one of 34 evaluable patients (91%) achieved a durable engraftment. All 3 patients who rejected had a nonmalignant disease and received a MUD transplantation (2 mismatched at 1 antigen). Three patients died of a transplantation-related complication (9% ± 5.2%). Seven patients had disease relapse or progression, 2 of whom died. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 15-85 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was 61% ± 9.0% and the overall survival (OS) was 78% ± 7.5%. The median time to neutrophil recovery, B cell, and T cell reconstitution were 16 days, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. At 1 year, the median donor chimerism in whole blood, CD3, CD14/15, and CD19 subsets were 97%, 87%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Six patients (17% ± 6.6%) developed acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), only 2 of which were >grade II. Two patients (8% ± 5.4%) progressed to chronic GVHD (cGVHD). These results suggest that replacement of rATG with alemtuzumab may improve engraftment as well as decrease cGVHD rates without resulting in delays in immune reconstitution.
Background
Population pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of busulfan in children have shown that individualized model-based algorithms provide improved targeted busulfan therapy when compared to conventional dosing. The adoption of population PK models into routine clinical practice has been hampered by the tendency of pharmacologists to develop complex models too impractical for clinicians to use. The authors aimed to develop a population PK model for busulfan in children that can reliably achieve therapeutic exposure (concentration-at-steady-state, Css) and implement a simple, model-based tool for the initial dosing of busulfan in children undergoing HCT.
Patients and Methods
Model development was conducted using retrospective data available in 90 pediatric and young adult patients who had undergone HCT with busulfan conditioning. Busulfan drug levels and potential covariates influencing drug exposure were analyzed using the non-linear mixed effects modeling software, NONMEM. The final population PK model was implemented into a clinician-friendly, Microsoft Excel-based tool and used to recommend initial doses of busulfan in a group of 21 pediatric patients prospectively dosed based on the population PK model.
Results
Modeling of busulfan time-concentration data indicates busulfan CL displays non-linearity in children, decreasing up to approximately 20% between the concentrations of 250–2000 ng/mL. Important patient-specific covariates found to significantly impact busulfan CL were actual body weight and age. The percentage of individuals achieving a therapeutic Css was significantly higher in subjects receiving initial doses based on the population PK model (81%) versus historical controls dosed on conventional guidelines (52%) (p = 0.02).
Conclusion
When compared to the conventional dosing guidelines, the model-based algorithm demonstrates significant improvement for providing targeted busulfan therapy in children and young adults.
Social determinants of health, including poverty, contribute significantly to health outcomes in the United States, yet their impact on pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes is poorly understood. We aimed to identify the association between neighborhood-poverty and HCT outcomes for pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database. We assembled two pediatric cohorts who received a first, allogeneic HCT from 2006-2015 at age ≤18 years; including 2053 children with malignant disease and 1696 children with non-malignant disease. Neighborhood-poverty exposure was defined a priori per U.S. Census definition as living in a high-poverty ZIP code (>=20% of persons below 100% Federal Poverty Level) and used as the primary predictor in all analyses. Our primary outcome was overall survival (OS) defined as time from HCT until death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included relapse and transplant-related mortality (TRM) in malignant disease, acute and chronic GVHD, and infection in the first 100 days post-HCT. Among children transplanted for non-malignant disease, neighborhood-poverty was not associated with any HCT outcome. Among children transplanted for malignant disease, neighborhood-poverty conferred an increased risk of TRM but was not associated with inferior OS or any other transplant outcome. Among children with malignant disease, a key secondary finding was that children with Medicaid insurance experienced inferior OS and increased TRM compared to those with private insurance. These data suggest opportunities for future investigation of household-level poverty exposures on HCT outcomes in pediatric malignant disease to inform care delivery interventions.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for children and adults with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite increasing survival rates, long-term morbidity after HCT is substantial. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a serious cause of morbidity, yet little is known about neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT. To address this gap, collaborative efforts of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation undertook an expert review of neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT. In this review we define what constitutes neurocognitive dysfunction, characterize its risk factors and sequelae, describe tools and methods to assess neurocognitive function in HCT recipients, and discuss possible interventions for HCT patients with this condition. This review aims to help clinicians understand the scope of this health-related problem, highlight its impact on well-being of survivors, and help determine factors that may improve identification of patients at risk for declines in cognitive functioning after HCT. In particular, we review strategies for preventing and treating neurocognitive dysfunction in HCT patients. Finally, we highlight the need for well-designed studies to develop and test interventions aimed at preventing and improving neurocognitive dysfunction and its sequelae after HCT.
Non-graft-versus-host disease (non-GVHD) ocular complications are generally uncommon after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but can cause prolonged morbidity affecting activities of daily living and quality of life. Here we provide an expert review of non-GVHD ocular complications in a collaboration between transplant physicians and ophthalmologists through the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Complications discussed in this review include cataracts, glaucoma, ocular infections, ocular involvement with malignancy, ischemic microvascular retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion, retinal hemorrhage, retinal detachment and ocular toxicities associated with medications. We have summarized incidence, risk factors, screening, prevention and treatment of individual complications and generated evidence-based recommendations. Baseline ocular evaluation before HCT should be considered in all patients who undergo HCT. Follow-up evaluations should be considered according to clinical symptoms, signs and risk factors. Better preventive strategies and treatments remain to be investigated for individual ocular complications after HCT. Both transplant physicians and ophthalmologists should be knowledgeable of non-GVHD ocular complications and provide comprehensive collaborative team care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.