Human acellular tissue matrix (AlloDerm) use in breast reconstruction has become popular. Traditionally used for prosthesis coverage, it is also used in our practice as a filler for lumpectomy defects and a contouring device. However, no report presently exists that describes its appearance on oncologic surveillance studies. We performed a retrospective review of all charts of patients having undergone cancer-related breast reconstruction using AlloDerm as a filler at a single institution between 2005 and 2009. Postoperative mammograms and dynamic contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed with a dedicated breast imager. Sixteen women underwent surgery involving placement of an AlloDerm roll in the breast. Postoperative films were unavailable for two of them. Of the remaining 14 patients, nine had postoperative mammograms only, three had postoperative dynamic contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging only, and two patients had both. In all cases, evaluation of the postoperative images was not affected by the presence of AlloDerm. In our short-term, retrospective experience, we find that a thorough radiographic evaluation of the breast tissue remains possible when AlloDerm rolls are used in reconstruction.
Purpose:The overriding goal of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is to restore body image and satisfy patient expectations. Measuring individual patient expectations would allow surgeons to identify patients who have unrealistic expectations, and subsequently to address their issues preoperatively through focused pre-surgical education. The purpose of our study is to develop a questionnaire to measure individual patient expectations for breast reconstruction.Methods: Interviews were conducted with 44 women undergoing breast reconstruction. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Conceptual domains were used to organize statements into a preliminary version of the questionnaire. The preliminary version was then pilot tested with 30 women undergoing breast reconstruction, and was reviewed by an expert panel, to create the field test version. The field test version was then administered to 150 women prior to undergoing breast reconstruction.Results: Patient interviews revealed that expectations for breast reconstruction fall into four main domains: Breast Appearance and Outcome, Physical Well-being, Psychosocial Well-being, and Process of Care. These domains formed the organizational structure for the questionnaire. Pilot testing resulted in minor wording changes, clarified ambiguities, and recognized missing content. Using field test data, item reduction was performed to create the final scales.Conclusions: Patient expectations for the results of breast reconstruction are complex, and encompass not only breast appearance, but physical well-being, psychological wellbeing, and process of care. This study is essential in the quest to improve patient satisfaction with the results of breast reconstruction. A formalized appreciation of expectations will initiate further research into the link between expectations, satisfaction and quality of life for breast cancer survivors. The questionnaire will provide surgeons and patients with a valid tool to guide discussions about expectations.Background: Current options for immediate breast reconstruction following partial mastectomy or lumpectomy include latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and simple closure among others. Latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction is currently the most widely accepted option, however it can be associated with significant complications. Acellular dermal matrix has been used to improve cosmetic results of various flap reconstructions. One type of cadaveric dermal matrix is AlloDerm (Lifecell, NJ). To date, no studies have evaluated the use of AlloDerm as filler for breast defects using patient satisfaction surveys for qualitative outcomes. Our goal is to determine whether the use of acellular dermal matrix in lumpectomy or partial breast reconstruction produces satisfactory results compared to current reconstructive options. We also aim to establish a quantitative and qualitative scale for evaluation. Finally, we will evaluate whether post reconstruction radiation affects outcomes when using AlloDerm. Methods:Retrospecti...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.