Hierarchical cluster analysis is an effective approach to analyse high-volume immunohistochemical data to generate an optimal panel in the differential diagnosis of oncocytoma from its mimics.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) can be categorized into uterine, retroperitoneal, nonretroperitoneal soft tissue, cutaneous, visceral, and osseous anatomic subtypes. The differential expression of smooth muscle markers, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Wilms tumor‐1 protein (WT1) by anatomic subtype and gender was explored. METHODS: A total of 78 LMS comprised of 30 uterine and 48 nonuterine tumors were studied. Nonuterine tumors were comprised of 17 soft tissue, 16 retroperitoneal, 7 cutaneous, 5 visceral, and 3 osseous subtypes. Immunohistochemical staining intensity on tissue microarray slides was scored as 0, 1+, or 2+, and cluster analysis was performed on the data. RESULTS: Smooth muscle actin was the most sensitive antibody (95%), followed by muscle‐specific actin (91%), calponin (88%), desmin (73%), caldesmon (66%), and myosin (64%). Caldesmon and myosin were usually coexpressed, and were highest in retroperitoneal tumors (94%). There was no discernable correlation noted between histologic differentiation and smooth muscle marker expression. ER was much more common in women, with the highest frequencies noted in female retroperitoneal (86%) and uterine (63%) tumors. Nuclear WT1 was expressed in 11% of all tumors, and was limited to ER‐positive uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors. Cluster analysis segregated 4 groups, most notably 1 driven by ER and PR, with the vast majority being uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle markers demonstrated variable sensitivities in LMS, with a tendency for anatomic subtypes to segregate based on expression patterns of these markers. ER defined a subgroup of uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors, and WT1 was limited to such tumors, suggesting a common line of differentiation as well as potential therapeutic targets. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

The UP2 antibody outperforms the UP3 antibody, including in diagnostically challenging settings, and is a useful addition to the armamentarium of biomarkers for UC.

Lack of INI-1 expression, noted exclusively in RMCs, segregates RMCs into a separate cluster. PAX8 is rarely positive (17%) in UC, is commonly expressed in CDC, RMC, PRCC and CRCC and is superior to PAX2.

The internal abdominal muscles are biaxially loaded in vivo, and therefore length-tension relations along and transverse to the directions of the muscle fibers are important in understanding their mechanical properties. We hypothesized that 1) internal oblique and transversus abdominis form an internal abdominal composite muscle with altered compliance than that of either muscle individually, and 2) anisotropy, different compliances in orthogonal directions, of internal abdominal composite muscle is less pronounced than that of its individual muscles. To test these hypotheses, in vitro mechanical testing was performed on 5 x 5 cm squares of transversus abdominis, internal oblique, and the two muscles together as a composite. These tissues were harvested from the left lateral side of abdominal muscles of eleven mongrel dogs (15-23 kg) and placed in a bath of oxygenated Krebs solution. Each tissue strip was attached to a biaxial mechanical testing device. Each muscle was passively lengthened and shortened along muscle fibers, transverse to fibers, or simultaneously along and transverse to muscle fibers. Both transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles demonstrated less extensibility in the direction transverse to muscle fibers than along fibers. Biaxial loading caused a stiffening effect that was greater in the direction along the fibers than transverse to the fibers. Furthermore, the abdominal muscle composite was less compliant than either muscle alone in the direction of the muscle fibers. Taken together, our data suggested that the internal abdominal composite tissue has complex mechanical properties that are dependent on the mechanical properties of internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles.