Studies of long-standing type 2 diabetes (T2D) report a deficit in beta-cell mass due to increased apoptosis, whereas neogenesis and replication are unaffected. It is unclear whether these changes are a cause or a consequence of T2D. Moreover, whereas islet morphogenetic plasticity has been demonstrated in vitro, the in situ plasticity of islets, as well as the effect of T2D on endocrine differentiation, is unknown. We compared beta-cell volume, neogenesis, replication, and apoptosis in pancreata from lean and obese (body mass index > or = 27 kg/m(2)) diabetic (5 +/- 2 yr since diagnosis) and nondiabetic cadaveric donors. We also subjected isolated islets from diabetic (3 +/- 1 yr since diagnosis) and nondiabetic donors to an established in vitro model of islet plasticity. Differences in beta-cell volume between diabetic and nondiabetic donors were consistently less pronounced than those reported in long-standing T2D. A compensatory increase in beta-cell neogenesis appeared to mediate this effect. Studies of induced plasticity indicated that islets from diabetic donors were capable of epithelial dedifferentiation but did not demonstrate regenerative potential, as was seen in islets from nondiabetic donors. This deficiency was associated with the overexpression of Notch signaling molecules and a decreased neurogenin-3(+) cell frequency. One interpretation of these results would be that decreased beta-cell volume is a consequence, not a cause, of T2D, mediated by increased apoptosis and attenuated beta-cell (re)generation. However, other explanations are also possible. It remains to be seen whether the morphogenetic plasticity of human islets, deficient in vitro in islets from diabetic donors, is a component of normal beta-cell mass dynamics.

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.

Retroperitoneal fasciitis is a rare but potentially lethal complication of infection. Early diagnosis is crucial and is usually made when there is a high degree of clinical suspicion combined with characteristic imaging findings leading to early surgical intervention. Computed tomography (CT) can play a central role in demonstrating early findings, assessing the extent of disease to help determine the best surgical approach, identifying the primary source of infection, and evaluating the treatment response. The possible presence of retroperitoneal fasciitis should be considered in patients presenting with symptoms of sepsis, including pain that is disproportionate with the clinical abnormality. When retroperitoneal fasciitis is suspected, emergency CT can facilitate early diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of disease. Common findings at CT include fascial thickening and enhancement, muscular edema, fat stranding, fluid collections, and abscess formation. Gas tracking along fascial planes in the retroperitoneum is the hallmark of retroperitoneal fasciitis but is not seen in all cases. Another important clue to the diagnosis is asymmetric involvement of the retroperitoneal fascial planes and deep tissues. Fasciitis in the retroperitoneum may originate from infected retroperitoneal organs or from infection that spreads along indirect and/or direct pathways from a primary source elsewhere in the body. Findings of indirect tracking and transgression of fascial planes may indicate more severe infection associated with the necrotizing form of retroperitoneal fasciitis. Despite aggressive antibiotic treatment, early and repeated surgical débridement may be required to remove nonviable tissue in patients with the necrotizing form of retroperitoneal fasciitis. Awareness of the anatomy of the retroperitoneum, potential routes of spread of infection, and the spectrum of CT findings in retroperitoneal fasciitis is needed to achieve prompt diagnosis and guide treatment.

Malignancy grade was slightly to moderately predicted by margin, lesion boundary, and acoustic sonographic features. In particular, grade 3 invasive ductal breast carcinomas were more likely than expected to display microlobulated margins, abrupt interfaces, and posterior enhancement.

Hip pain is a commonly reported primary symptom with many potential causes. The causal entity can remain elusive, even after clinical history review, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Although there are many options for definitive treatment, many of these procedures are invasive, are associated with risk of morbidity, and can be unsuccessful, with lengthy revision surgery required. Percutaneous musculoskeletal intervention is an attractive alternative to more invasive procedures and an indispensable tool for evaluating and managing hip pain. US is an ideal modality for imaging guidance owing to its low cost, portability, lack of ionizing radiation, and capability for real-time visualization of soft-tissue and bone structures during intervention. The authors review both common and advanced US-guided procedures involving the pelvis and hip, including anesthetic and corticosteroid injections, percutaneous viscosupplementation, platelet-rich plasma injection to promote tendon healing, and microwave ablation for neurolysis. In addition, specific anatomic structures implicated in hip pain are discussed and include the hip joint, iliopsoas bursa, ilioinguinal nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, greater trochanteric bursa, iliotibial band, ischiogluteal bursa, hamstring tendon origin, piriformis muscle, and quadratus femoris muscle. The relevant US-depicted anatomy and principles underlying technically successful interventions also are discussed. Familiarity with these techniques can aid radiologists in assuming an important role in the care of patients with hip pain. ©

No abstract

Ultrasound-guided core biopsy accurately predicts high-grade breast tumors but is moderately accurate for lower-grade lesions. Large tumor size negatively impacts the accuracy of tumor grade found on biopsy and is associated with underestimation.

No abstract