Poor sleep in persons with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a common stressor for family caregivers. Retrospective reports support associations between sleep disturbance in persons with AD and worse caregiver mood; however, prospective associations between sleep in persons with AD and caregiver outcomes have not been studied. The current study determined associations between affect and sleep of persons with AD and their caregivers using daily diary data. Multilevel mediation models indicated that sleep in persons with AD is linked to caregiver affect; furthermore, these associations are mediated by sleep characteristics in caregivers and affect in persons with AD. Daily fluctuations in sleep behaviors in persons with AD—rather than average values—were most strongly associated with caregiver outcomes. Interventions to improve sleep in persons with AD may decrease their negative affect and improve caregiver mood.

Brief cognitive tests designed for severe dementia such as the SIB-8 and sMMSE have been evaluated in this project to be shorter in administration duration and highly correlated with gold standard instruments: the SIB and MMSE.

Objective: Hypertension, diabetes, depressive symptoms, and smoking are predictors of cognitive decline in late life. It is unknown if these risk factors are associated with cognition during midlife or if the associations between these risk factors and cognition vary by race. This longitudinal study examined (a) risk factors for decline in episodic memory, processing speed, and working memory in midlife women and (b) if the associations between risk factors and cognitive decline were moderated by race. Method: Participants (aged 42-52) were European American (n = 1,000), African American (n = 516), and Asian American (n = 437) women from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Two-level hierarchical linear models tested risk factors, race, and their interactions as predictors of cognitive change over time. Results: African Americans had poorer baseline episodic memory, processing speed, and working memory and greater episodic memory decline compared to European Americans. Asian Americans had poorer episodic memory and working memory, but better processing speed than European Americans. Depressive symptoms were associated with poorer episodic memory and processing speed at baseline; further, diabetes was associated with poorer processing speed at baseline. Greater depressive symptoms were associated with poorer episodic memory at baseline for African Americans but not European Americans. Conclusions: Our study results highlight racial disparities in cognition during midlife. Depressive symptoms may be particularly detrimental to the cognitive health of African Americans. Clinical and public health interventions for healthy cognitive aging should be tailored to the unique risks of racial groups. Key PointsQuestion: Are there racial group differences in the associations between risk factors and cognitive decline during midlife? Findings: Depressive symptoms are a significant predictor of poor cognition for African American women but not for Asian American and European American women. Importance: Clinical interventions to promote healthy cognitive aging in African Americans should focus on depressive symptoms. Next Steps: Future research should determine why depressive symptoms are more strongly linked to poorer cognition in African Americans compared to other racial groups.

The older adult population in the United States (U.S.) is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, whereas most practicing neuropsychologists are white. Psychologists hold social privilege of which they may not be aware and work in health care systems that benefit the racial majority. System-level change is necessary to create a more equitable and accessible health care system for racially and ethnically diverse older adults. It is vital for the field of psychology to understand how oppression, power, and privilege impact the accessibility, reliability, and effectiveness of psychological assessment. The aim of this article is to address how historical medical injustices, poor education quality, barriers to communication, biases, and intersectionality influence psychological evaluations. Via a selective literature review, we illustrate how these issues apply to working with racially and ethnically diverse older adults. We discuss the historical context of the multicultural approach to assessment; system-and interpersonal-level manifestations of oppression; and age-cohort-related considerations. A clinical vignette illustrates how oppression, power, and privilege can manifest in the context of an evaluation. We issue a commentary and call to action, charging psychologists to implement individual-and system-level change. We provide recommendations for culturally responsive psychological assessments. Public Significance StatementThis article addresses how oppression, power, and privilege can occur in the psychological assessment with racially and ethnically diverse older adults. We provide recommendations for a culturally responsive approach to assessment.