No abstract

Previous research yielded equivocal results concerning implicit learning abilities of developmental dyslexic readers. These studies employed a sequence learning task that requires a motor response to each stimulus. However, implicit learning has been often studied using non-motor tasks. Thus, we investigated implicit learning capabilities of adult developmental dyslexic readers in two standard implicit learning paradigms differing in the involvement of the motor system, namely the serial response time task (SRTT) and artificial grammar learning (AGL).Twelve adult developmental dyslexic and twelve age- and sex- matched normal readers were tested. In the serial response time task (SRTT), participants are exposed to a structured display. Learning is measured by comparing response time (RT) to the structured sequence with RT to a random display. In the artificial grammar learning task (AGL), letter strings following a markovian finite state grammar are presented. In a subsequent test phase subjects have to judge new letter strings according to their grammaticality. Learning of the stimulus regularities was found in both tasks and for both groups of subjects. Furthermore, participants were unaware of the underlying stimulus construction principles. Dyslexic readers were unimpaired in SRTT as well as artificial grammar learning relative to normal readers. These findings show that implicit learning is intact in dyslexia. Intact implicit learning capabilities should be taken into account when designing training programs for developmental dyslexic readers.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The use of self-generated and externally provided information in performance monitoring is reflected by the appearance of error-related and feedback-related negativities (ERN and FRN), respectively. Several authors proposed that ERN and FRN are supported by similar neural mechanisms residing in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. The present study is aimed to test the functional relationship between ERN and FRN. Using an Eriksen-Flanker task with a moving response deadline we tested 17 young healthy subjects. Subjects received feedback with respect to their response accuracy and response speed. To fulfill both requirements of the task, they had to press the correct button and had to respond in time to give a valid response.

Background: The present study used event-related brain potentials to investigate semantic, phonological and syntactic processes in adult German dyslexic and normal readers in a word reading task. Pairs of German words were presented one word at a time. Subjects had to perform a semantic judgment task (house -window; are they semantically related?), a rhyme judgment task (house -mouse; do they rhyme?) and a gender judgment task (das -Haus [the -house]; is the gender correct? [in German, house has a neutral gender: das Haus]).