We numerically compare ionization rates and photoelectron energy spectra resulting from the so-called length gauge (LG) and velocity gauge (VG) forms of the Keldysh–Faisal–Reiss (KFR) theory for a circularly polarized laser field. To this end, we use the well-known analytical formulae for the ground state of a hydrogen atom and we derive analogous formulae for its first excited (degenerate) state. It appears that both forms of the KFR theories show qualitatively different behaviour of ionization rate as a function of frequency and intensity of the laser field. In the LG KFR theory, one obtains much smaller stabilization of the hydrogen atom than in the VG KFR theory. Unlike the latter one, the LG KFR theory shows that for sufficiently strong laser field (in the non-relativistic and dipole approximations) ionization rate from a given initial state is only a function of intensity, but not of frequency of the laser field. We also find substantial differences in the shape of photoelectron energy spectra for both theories. In contrast to the VG KFR theory, the LG one shows a minimum in photoelectron energy spectra for some initial states of the hydrogen atom. We discuss our results by comparing them, where possible, to other theoretical calculations.
2 15 / 10 cm W they can not be neglected in a full description of the laser-atom interaction. We explore the region that with increasing intensity switches from multiphoton to over the barrrier ionization and we find unlike in tunneling-type theories, that the ratio of ionization rates for electrons initially counter-rotating and co-rotating (with respect to the laser field) may be higher or lower than one._____________ *bauer@uni.lodz.pl
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.