Osteoporosis is a major public health problem in the United States of America and around the world, largely due to the morbidity and mortality associated with osteoporotic fractures. In the past decade, large epidemiologic studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of patients who fracture. However, most studies are limited to postmenopausal white women. In this retrospective review, we analyze data from 185 men and women with acute fragility fractures who received osteoporosis consultations during admission to a single urban hospital between 2001 and 2003. Men and women differed in terms of risk factors for falls and osteoporosis but had areal bone mineral density (BMD) measurements remarkably similar, except at the total hip. Black and Hispanic subjects with fractures were significantly younger than whites yet were much more likely to have serious co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. In spite of significantly higher BMD measurements, black patients had the highest rates of vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Patients admitted with hip fractures differed from those with non-hip fractures on a number of important variables. Based on these data, we conclude that elderly subjects admitted to an urban hospital with osteoporotic fractures are a heterogeneous group, with features that vary according to fracture type, gender and ethnicity. Future studies of patients with clinical fragility fractures should include ample numbers of men and ethnic minorities, since differences in underlying risk factors may suggest alternative strategies for fracture prevention.
Background Modular, metal-backed tibial (MBT) components are associated with locking mechanism dysfunction, breakage, backside wear, and osteolysis, which compromise survivorship. All-polyethylene tibial (APT) components eliminate problems associated with MBTs, but, historically, APT utilization has generally been limited to older, less active patients. However, it is unclear whether APT utilization can be expanded to a nonselected patient population. Questions/purposes We therefore determined the survivorship of APT components compared with MBT components in a non-age-or activity-selected population who underwent TKA. Methods Using a longitudinal database, we identified 775 patients with primary TKAs utilizing a single implant design between 1999 and 2007. Of these, 558 (72%) patients had APT components (APT2), while 217 (28%) patients with tibial bone loss or defects, contralateral MBT components, or a BMI of greater than 37.5 received MBT components. We determined the survivorship in the two groups. The minimum followup was 2 years for both groups (mean ± SD: MBT, 80 ± 29 months; APT, 63 ± 27 months). The APT group was older (average age: APT2, 70 years; MBT, 64.7 years) and had a lower BMI than the MBT group (APT2, 30.8; MBT, 33.8).Results Survivorship, as defined by revision for any reason, was 99% for the APT group and 97% for the MBT group. There were four (2%) tibial failures in the MBT group in patients with a BMI of greater than 40. There were no revisions for loosening or osteolysis in the APT group. Conclusion APT implants perform as well as MBT implants in a non-age-or activity-selected TKA population with a BMI of less than 37.5. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
In patients with glenoid neck fractures, pure medial translation of the glenoid relative to the axial skeleton rarely occurs. Instead, there is typically a component of shortening of the scapula width combined with lateralization of the scapular body.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.