No abstract

No abstract

Background: We compared the following 30-day outcomes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) (1) mortality, (2) major and minor complication rates, and (3) discharge disposition. Methods: From 2011 to 2016, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database contained 45,871 SA total hip arthroplasties and 65,092 receiving GA. There were 80,077 SA TKAs and 103,003 GA TKAs. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression evaluated associations between anesthesia type and 30-day outcomes. Results: Anesthesia modality was not associated with 30-day mortality (P > 0.05). The GA cohorts were at a greater risk for any complication, major complications, and minor complications (P < 0.05). Patients who received GA were at an increased risk for nonhome discharge. Conclusion: Patients who undergo total joint arthroplasty with SA experience fewer 30-day complications and are less likely to have a nonhome discharge than those with GA.

Background: Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to increase both mortality and complications, but has potential benefits including decreased length of stay, rehabilitation time, and costs. The purpose of this study was to use data from a nationally representative database to identify if there is a population of patients undergoing TKA in whom bilateral TKA can be safely performed, by comparing 30-day mortality and complication rates with those of patients undergoing unilateral TKA. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried to compare 30-day rates of mortality and any complication between bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA. A total of 8,291 patients who underwent bilateral TKA were matched 1:1 with a unilateral TKA control cohort (n = 315,219) by morbidity probability, which is a cumulative variable encompassing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. Patients were divided into quartiles based on morbidity probability. Binary logistic regression comparing bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA for the same quartiles was performed to establish if any population could safely have bilateral TKA performed. Results: Bilateral TKA had an increased risk for all complications (p < 0.001) and major complications (p < 0.001) when compared with unilateral TKA regardless of health status. For all complications, there was a greater than threefold increase for the first quartile (healthiest patients) (p < 0.001), a greater than fourfold increase for the second and third quartiles (p < 0.001), and a greater than threefold increase for the fourth quartile (least healthy patients) (p < 0.001). For major complications, there was a greater than twofold increase for the first quartile (p = 0.001) and the second quartile (p < 0.001), an almost threefold increase for the third quartile (p < 0.001), and a 57% increase for the fourth quartile (p = 0.005). Conclusions: This study will assist shared decision-making between orthopaedic surgeons and patients by suggesting that bilateral TKA may not be as safe an option for even healthy individuals compared with unilateral TKA. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Understanding time trends in age, demographic characteristics, and comorbidities is especially critical to highlight the effects on clinical practice change, outcomes, and the value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify trends in the demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and episode-of-care outcomes for patients who underwent TKA from 2008 to 2018. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried to identify patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and episode-of-care outcomes in patients who underwent primary TKA from 2008 to 2018 (n = 350,879). Trends for continuous variables were analyzed using analysis of variance, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Results: From 2008 to 2018, there was no clinically important difference in age, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of patients with BMI of >40 kg/m2 and no clinically important difference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.5% in 2008 and 3.2% in 2018), congestive heart failure within 30 days (0.3% in both 2008 and 2018), and acute renal failure (0.1% in 2008 and <0.1% in 2018) among patients undergoing TKA. However, modifiable comorbidities, including smoking status (9.5% in 2008 and 7.7% in 2018; p < 0.001), hypertension (71.0% in 2008 and 63.7% in 2018; p < 0.001), and anemia (16.2% in 2008 and 9.7% in 2018; p < 0.001), functional status, and overall morbidity and mortality probability have improved, with no clinically important difference in the percentage of diabetes (19.0% in 2008 and 18.1% in 2018). The hospital length of stay (mean [and standard deviation], 3.8 ± 2.2 days in 2008 and 2.1 ± 2.0 days in 2018; p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission (4.6% in 2011 and 3.0% in 2018; p < 0.001) decreased, with a significant increase in home discharge (65.6% in 2011 and 87.8% in 2018; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The overall patient health status improved from 2008 to 2018, with improvement in the modifiable comorbidities of smoking status, malnutrition, hypertension, and anemia; the functional status; and the overall morbidity and mortality probability, with no clinically relevant change in patient age; patient BMI; percentage of patients with BMI of >40 kg/m2; or patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure within 30 days, or acute renal failure. Our findings may be a reflection of a global shift toward value-based care focusing on patient optimization prior to arthroplasty, quality of care, and improved outcomes. The results of our study highlight the potential increase in TKA procedural value, which is paramount for health-care policy changes in today’s incentivized, value-based, health-care environment.