Bone mineral density (BMD) is the most important predictor of fracture risk. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date on lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, including 17 genome-wide association studies and 32,961 individuals of European and East Asian ancestry. We tested the top-associated BMD markers for replication in 50,933 independent subjects and for risk of low-trauma fracture in 31,016 cases and 102,444 controls. We identified 56 loci (32 novel)associated with BMD atgenome-wide significant level (P<5×10−8). Several of these factors cluster within the RANK-RANKL-OPG, mesenchymal-stem-cell differentiation, endochondral ossification and the Wnt signalling pathways. However, we also discovered loci containing genes not known to play a role in bone biology. Fourteen BMD loci were also associated with fracture risk (P<5×10−4, Bonferroni corrected), of which six reached P<5×10−8 including: 18p11.21 (C18orf19), 7q21.3 (SLC25A13), 11q13.2 (LRP5), 4q22.1 (MEPE), 2p16.2 (SPTBN1) and 10q21.1 (DKK1). These findings shed light on the genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BMD variation and fracture susceptibility.

Estrogens have long been known as important regulators of the female reproductive functions; however, our understanding of the role estrogens play in the human body has changed significantly over the past years. It is now commonly accepted that estrogens and androgens have important functions in both female and male physiology and pathology. This is in part due to the local synthesis and action of estrogens that broadens the role of estrogen signaling beyond that of the endocrine system. Furthermore, there are several different mechanisms through which the three estrogen receptors (ERs), ERα, ERβ and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) are able to regulate target gene transcription. ERα and ERβ are mostly associated with the direct and indirect genomic signaling pathways that result in target gene expression. Membrane-bound GPER1 is on the other hand responsible for the rapid non-genomic actions of estrogens that activate various protein-kinase cascades. Estrogen signaling is also tightly connected with another important regulatory entity, i.e. epigenetic mechanisms. Posttranslational histone modifications, microRNAs (miRNAs) and DNA methylation have been shown to influence gene expression of ERs as well as being regulated by estrogen signaling. Moreover, several coregulators of estrogen signaling also exhibit chromatin-modifying activities further underlining the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in estrogen signaling. This review wishes to highlight the newer aspects of estrogen signaling that exceed its classical endocrine regulatory role, especially emphasizing its tight intertwinement with epigenetic mechanisms.

No abstract

Bone and immune system are functionally interconnected. Immune and bone cells derive from same progenitors in the bone marrow, they share a common microenvironment and are being influenced by similar mediators. The evidence on increased bone resorption associated with inappropriate activation of T cells such as during inflammation, is well established. However, the molecular mechanisms beyond this clinical observation have begun to be intensively studied with the advancement of osteoimmunology. Now days, we have firm evidence on the influence of numerous proinflammatory cytokines on bone cells, with the majority of data focused on osteoclasts, the bone resorbing cells. It has been shown that some proinflammatory cytokines could possess osteoclastogenic and/or anti-osteoclastogenic properties and can target osteoclasts directly or via receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK)/RANK ligand(RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) system. Several studies have reported opposing data regarding (anti)osteoclastogenic properties of these cytokines.Therefore, the first part of this review is summarizing current evidence on the influence of pro-inflammatory cytokines on osteoclasts and thus on bone resorption. In the second part, the evidence on the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis is reviewed to show that unravelling the mechanisms beyond such complex bone diseases, is almost impossible without considering skeletal and immune systems as an indivisible integrated system.

Cathepsin K and MMP-9 are considered to be the most abundant proteases in osteoclasts. TRAP is a marker for osteoclasts, and there is increasing evidence of its proteolytic role in bone resorption. RANKL is a recently discovered regulator of osteoclast maturation and activity and induces expression of many genes. This study compared cathepsin K, MMP-9, TRAP, RANKL, OPG, and osteocalcin gene expression in the proximal femur of patients with osteoarthritis with that of patients with femoral neck fracture. Fifty-six patients undergoing arthroplasty because of osteoarthritis or femoral neck fracture were included in the study. Total mRNA was extracted from the bone samples obtained from the intertrochanteric region of the proximal femur. Real-time RT-PCR was used to quantify CTSK (cathepsin K), MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase 9), ACP5 (TRAP), TNFSF11 (RANKL), TNFRSF11B (OPG), and BGLAP (osteocalcin) mRNAs. The levels of mRNAs coding for MMP-9 and osteocalcin indicated higher expression in the osteoarthritic group (P = 0.011, P = 0.001, respectively), whereas RANKL expression and the ratio RANKL/OPG were both significantly lower in the osteoarthritic group than in the fracture group. Expression of cathepsin K, MMP-9, and TRAP relative to RANKL was significantly higher in the osteoarthritic group. Ratios of all three proteolytic enzymes relative to formation marker osteocalcin were higher in the fracture group. Gene expression of cathepsin K, MMP-9, TRAP, RANKL, OPG, and osteocalcin and the association between their mRNA levels pointed to higher bone resorption and bone formation in osteoarthritis, differences in balance between them, and differences in regulation of bone resorption in osteoarthritic and osteoporotic bone.