Gastrointestinal inflammation is a hallmark of highly prevalent disorders, including cancer treatment-induced mucositis and ulcerative colitis. These disorders cause debilitating symptoms, have a significant impact on quality of life, and are poorly managed. The activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been proposed to have a major influence on the inflammatory signalling pathways of the intestinal tract. Inhibition of TLR4 has been postulated as an effective way to treat intestinal inflammation. However, there are a limited number of studies looking into the potential of TLR4 antagonism as a therapeutic approach for intestinal inflammation. This review surveyed available literature and reported on the in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo effects of TLR4 antagonism on different models of intestinal inflammation. Of the studies reviewed, evidence suggests that there is indeed potential for TLR4 antagonists to treat inflammation, although only a limited number of studies have investigated treating intestinal inflammation with TLR4 antagonists directly. These results warrant further research into the effect of TLR4 antagonists in the intestinal tract.

Activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been shown to be a major influence on the inflammatory signalling pathways in intestinal mucositis (IM), as demonstrated by TLR4 knock-out mice. Pharmacological TLR4 inhibition has thus been postulated as a potential new therapeutic approach for the treatment of IM but specific TLR4 inhibitors have yet to be investigated. As such, we aimed to determine whether direct TLR4 antagonism prevents inflammation in pre-clinical experimental models of IM. The non-competitive and competitive TLR4 inhibitors, TAK-242 (10 µM) and IAXO-102 (10 µM), respectively, or vehicle were added to human T84, HT-29, and U937 cell lines and mouse colonic explants 1 h before the addition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (in vitro: 100 µg/mL; ex vivo: 10 µg/mL), SN-38 (in vitro: 1 µM or 1 nM; ex vivo: 2 µM), and/or tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (5 µg/mL). Supernatant was collected for human IL-8 and mouse IL-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), as a measure of inflammatory signalling. Cell viability was measured using XTT assays. Explant tissue was used in histopathological and RT-PCR analysis for genes of interest: TLR4, MD2, CD14, MyD88, IL-6, IL-6R, CXCL2, CXCR1, CXCR2. SN-38 increased cytostasis compared to vehicle (P < 0.0001). However, this was not prevented by either antagonist (P > 0.05) in any of the 3 cell lines. Quantitative histological assessment scores showed no differences between vehicle and treatment groups (P > 0.05). There were no differences in in vitro IL-8 (P > 0.05, in all 3 cells lines) and ex vivo IL-6 (P > 0.05) concentrations between vehicle and treatment groups. Transcript expression of all genes was similar across vehicle and treatment groups (P > 0.05). TLR4 antagonism using specific inhibitors TAK-242 and IAXO-102 was not effective at blocking IM in these pre-clinical models of mucositis. This work indicates that specific epithelial inhibition of TLR4 with these compounds is insufficient to manage mucositis-related inflammation. Rather, TLR4 signalling through immune cells may be a more important target to prevent IM.

Purpose Irinotecan can cause high levels of diarrhea caused by toxic injury to the gastrointestinal microenvironment. Tolllike receptor 4 (TLR4) and the gut microbiome have previously been implicated in gastrointestinal toxicity and diarrhea; however, the link between these two factors has not been definitively determined. We used a tumor-bearing, intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) TLR4 knockout model (Tlr4 ΔIEC ) to assess microbiome changes following irinotecan treatment. We then determined if a fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) between Tlr4 ΔIEC and wild-type (WT) mice altered irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Methods MC-38 colorectal cancer cells were injected into WT and Tlr4 ΔIEC mice. Fecal samples were collected prior to tumor inoculation, prior to irinotecan treatment and at cull. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to assess changes in the microbiome. Next, FMT was used to transfer the microbiome phenotype between Tlr4 ΔIEC and WT mice prior to irinotecan treatment. Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms were assessed. ResultsIn study 1, there were no compositional differences in the microbiome between Tlr4 ΔIEC and WT mice at baseline. However, predicted functional capacity of the microbiome was different between WT and Tlr4 ΔIEC at baseline and postirinotecan. In study 2, Tlr4 ΔIEC mice were protected from grade 3 diarrhea. Additionally, WT mice who did not receive FMT had more colonic damage in the colon compared to controls (P = 0.013). This was not seen in Tlr4 ΔIEC mice or WT mice who received FMT (P > 0.05). Conclusion Tlr4 ΔIEC and WT had no baseline compositional microbiome differences, but functional differences at baseline and following irinotecan. FMT altered some aspects of irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

Introduction Gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) is a side effect of high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11), causing debilitating symptoms that are often poorly managed. The role of TLR4 in the development of GIM has been clearly demonstrated. We, therefore, aimed to investigate the potential of the TLR4 antagonist, IAXO-102, to attenuate gastrointestinal inflammation as well as supress tumour activity in a colorectal-tumour-bearing mouse model of GIM induced by CPT-11. Methods 24 C57BL/6 mice received a vehicle, daily i.p. IAXO-102 (3 mg/kg), i.p. CPT-11 (270 mg/kg) or a combination of CPT-11 and IAXO-102. GIM was assessed using validated toxicity markers. At 72 h, colon and tumour tissue were collected and examined for histopathological changes and RT-PCR for genes of interest; TLR4, MD-2, CD-14, MyD88, IL-6, IL-6R, CXCL2, CXCR1, and CXCR2. Results IAXO-102 prevented diarrhoea in mice treated with CPT-11. Tumour volume in IAXO-102-treated mice was lower compared to vehicle at 48 h (P < 0.05). There were no differences observed in colon and tumour weights between the treatment groups. Mice who received the combination treatment had improved tissue injury score (P < 0.05) in the colon but did not show any improvements in cell proliferation or apoptotic rate. Expression of all genes was similar across all treatment groups in the tumour (P > 0.05). In the colon, there was a difference in transcript expression in vehicle vs. IAXO-102 (P < 0.05) and CPT-11 vs. combination (P < 0.01) in MD-2 and IL-6R, respectively. Conclusion IAXO-102 was able to attenuate symptomatic parameters of GIM induced by CPT-11 as well as reduce tissue injury in the colon. However, there was no effect on cell proliferation and apoptosis. As such, TLR4 activation plays a partial role in GIM development but further research is required to understand the specific inflammatory signals underpinning tissue-level changes.

No abstract