Objective-To evaluate whether comprehensive post-discharge care management for stroke survivors is superior to organized acute stroke unit care with enhanced discharge planning in improving a profile of health and well-being.Methods-This was a randomized trial of a comprehensive post-discharge care management intervention for ischemic stroke patients with NIH Stroke Scale scores ≥1 discharged from an acute stroke unit. An Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) performed an in-home assessment for the intervention group from which an Interdisciplinary Team developed patient-specific care plans. The APN worked with the primary care physician (PCP) and patient to implement the plan over the next 6 months.Main outcome measures-The intervention and usual care groups were compared using a global and closed hypothesis testing strategy. Outcomes fell into 5 domains: 1) Neuromotor Function, 2) Institution Time or Death, 3) Quality of Life, 4) Management of Risk, and 5) Stroke Knowledge and Lifestyle.Results-Treatment effect was near zero standard deviations for all but the stroke knowledge and lifestyle domain which showed a significant effect of the intervention (p=0.0003).Conclusions-Post discharge care management was not more effective than organized stroke unit care with enhanced discharge planning in most domains in this population. The intervention did, however, fill a post-discharge knowledge gap.
No abstract
Evidence‐based guidelines suggest that stroke patients should be screened for dysphagia before oral intake. The purpose of this study was to validate a dysphagia screening tool comparing registered nurses (RNs) with speech therapists (STs). All stroke unit patients who received predetermined scores on specific items of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were eligible for screening. The trial consisted of three parts (with swallow, cough, and vocal quality observed during each part): 1 teaspoon lemon ice, 1 teaspoon applesauce, and 1 teaspoon water. RNs performed five screenings that were compared with independent screenings performed on the same patient within 1 hour by a speech therapist (ST). Eighty‐three paired screenings were completed, with 94% agreement between the RNs and the STs. This screening identifies patients who are able to swallow and can eat from a safe menu until formally evaluated by an ST while maintaining nothing by mouth (NPO) status for those at risk for aspiration.
Background and Issues: The benchmark goal for stroke treatment is door to IV tPA in 60 minutes. In 2010, average door to IV tPA treatment time for acute stroke patients at our acute care, tertiary teaching hospital was 87 minutes. Purpose: As a TJC certified primary stroke center, our purpose was to improve door to IV tPA times. Methods: Causes for lengthy tPA treatment times were identified by the stroke interdisciplinary team using a root cause analysis approach. Identified delays included: lab turn-around times, order entry, clinical decision making time, and tPA preparation, delivery, and administration. Process improvement initiatives for order entry included revisions to electronic order sets to auto-populate and enhance efficiency and safety of order entry. Lab audits revealed that the BMP took the most time to process, resulting in initiation of point of care testing. For clinical decision making delays by neurology, immediate feedback was provided to the neurologist after each tPA administration. A year end summary was compiled showing door to tPA times for each attending neurologist. In addition, 3 APNs completed a neurovascular advanced practice fellowship program. Pharmacy instituted a tracking log to audit prep-to-delivery time which encouraged earlier notification and faster delivery times. Mixing of tPA was changed from (2) 50mg vials to reconstitution of (1) 100mg vial. Nurses who administer tPA were re-competencied using a simulation lab. Patients were triaged to a room in ED closer to the CT scanner. And, a count-down clock was initiated upon patient arrival to ED to enhance time awareness for all stroke team members. Results: Average door to tPA time has decreased from 87 minutes in 2010 to 50 minutes YTD 2013, a 37 minute improvement. In addition, volume increased by 25 more tPA administrations in 2012. Chi square comparisons of discharge dispositions showed no statistical differences for 2010 vs 2013 (p=.56) or 2012 vs 2013 (p= .18). Our hospital has received the American Stroke Association’s Target Stroke award for the past 2 years. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach using a root cause analysis is effective in identifying and implementing process improvements, ultimately leading to decreased door to IV tPA times.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.