Two experiments were performed to determine the effect of sample duration (0.1, 2, and 4 sec), delay interval (.03, 4, 8, 16, and 32 sec), and type of stimulus (color and shape) on the matehing performance of rhesus monkeys. In Experiment I, the 15 possible delay-duration combinations were randomly presented in blocks of 15 trials. In Experiment 2, each duration was held constant and the five delays randomly presented. Then each delay interval was held constant with the three durations randomly varied. Matching performance increased as sample duration increased (ps< .01 and .005), while length of delay did not significantly affect performance. The type of stimuli paired in the matehing test significantly affected performance (ps< .05 and .10) with the shape/shape choices leading to the poorest performance. Stimulus discriminability and amount of training with brief sampie durations were implicated as significant determinants of matehing performance.In recent years, the delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task has been used extensively in nonhuman primate memory research. The wide use of the DMTS task to study animal memory is partially due to the noted similarities in task requirements between it and the short-term memory (STM) paradigm used with humans (e.g., Peterson & Peterson, 1959). Also, the effects of amount of interpolated activity, repetition of the stimulus, and stimulus difficulty in the DMTS tasks are generally similar to the effects of these variables on human STM (Jarrard & Moise, 1971). However, neither the animal DMTS nor the human STM literature has been consistent in reports of the effects of stimulus duration. A major aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between stimulus presentation time and the degree of retention using a DMTS paradigm.The initial task of the subject in a STM experiment most likely involves the perceptual processes of identification or encoding of a stimulus item. Thus, temporal factors in the perceptual stage should strongly influence STM recall accuracy. That is, decreases in stimulus duration should restriet the time for perception and result in poorer recall. Although Aaronson (1967) concluded from her review of the human literature that the time interval between stimuli was more important in STM than stimulus duration per se, her conclusion has not
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.