DTI indices have been associated with cellular rejection in adult heart transplant recipients, but their predictive value in pediatric recipients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate DTI measures in the detection of cellular and AMR in pediatric heart transplant recipients. One hundred and forty-eight pediatric heart transplant recipients who had 267 cardiac catheterization procedures with EMB, echocardiogram with DTI, and BNP level performed on the same day were included in the study. For the mitral and tricuspid valves, the ratios (E/E') between the early diastolic inflow velocity by pulsed Doppler (E, m/s) and the early diastolic annular velocity by DTI (E', m/s) were obtained and compared between subjects with and without rejection. Of the 148 recipients, 30 subjects had a total of 37 episodes of rejection: 10 cellular (>or=1B), 17 AMR, and 10 biopsy-negative clinical rejection. Mitral and tricuspid valve E/E' ratios were significantly higher in rejectors than in non-rejectors (5.5 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.4, p < 0.001 and 4.9 +/- 2.1 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.5, p < 0.01, respectively). By multivariate linear regression, mitral valve E/E' was an independent predictor of rejection. Mitral and tricuspid valve E/E' <5.0 had 93% and 89% NPV, respectively, for rejection. Mitral and tricuspid valve E/E' ratios <5.0 may be useful non-invasive screening measures to exclude rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
This is the first longitudinal, multicenter assessment of complication rates for PICCs and TIVADs in a large cohort of adults and children with CF. Specific patient- and catheter-related characteristics were associated with increased risk of complications. Center effects on complication rates were observed for PICCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.