The emerging sequence of the heterochromatic portion of the Drosophila melanogaster genome, with the most recent update of euchromatic sequence, gives the first genome-wide view of the chromosomal distribution of the telomeric retrotransposons, HeT-A, TART, and Tahre. As expected, these elements are entirely excluded from euchromatin, although sequence fragments of HeT-A and TART 3Ј untranslated regions are found in nontelomeric heterochromatin on the Y chromosome. The proximal ends of HeT-A/TART arrays appear to be a transition zone because only here do other transposable elements mix in the array. The sharp distinction between the distribution of telomeric elements and that of other transposable elements suggests that chromatin structure is important in telomere element localization. Measurements reported here show (1) D. melanogaster telomeres are very long, in the size range reported for inbred mouse strains (averaging 46 kb per chromosome end in Drosophila stock 2057). As in organisms with telomerase, their length varies depending on genotype. There is also slight under-replication in polytene nuclei. (2) Surprisingly, the relationship between the number of HeT-A and TART elements is not stochastic but is strongly correlated across stocks, supporting the idea that the two elements are interdependent. Although currently assembled portions of the HeT-A/TART arrays are from the most-proximal part of long arrays, ∼61% of the total HeT-A sequence in these regions consists of intact, potentially active elements with little evidence of sequence decay, making it likely that the content of the telomere arrays turns over more extensively than has been thought.

Telomeres across the genus Drosophila are maintained, not by telomerase, but by two non-LTR retrotransposons, HeT-A and TART, that transpose specifically to chromosome ends. Successive transpositions result in long head-to-tail arrays of these elements. Thus Drosophila telomeres, like those produced by telomerase, consist of repeated sequences reverse transcribed from RNA templates. The Drosophila repeats, complete and 5′-truncated copies of HeT-A and TART, are more complex than telomerase repeats; nevertheless these evolutionary variants have functional similarities to the more common telomeres. Like other telomeres, the Drosophila arrays are dynamic, fluctuating around an average length that can be changed by changes in the genetic background. Several proteins that interact with telomeres in other species have been found to have homologues that interact with Drosophila telomeres. Although they have hallmarks of non-LTR retrotransposons, HeT-A and TART appear to have a special relationship to Drosophila. Their Gag proteins are efficiently transported into diploid nuclei where HeT-A Gag recruits TART Gag to chromosome ends. Gags of other non-LTR elements remain predominantly in the cytoplasm. These studies provide intriguing evolutionary links between telomeres and retrotransposable elements.

R2 non-LTR retrotransposable elements insert site-specifically into the 28S ribosomal genes of insects. The sequence of the 5' end of full-length R2 elements from thirteen species of Drosophila were compared. Sequences within the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR) revealed little to suggest the presence of a promoter. Protein translation initiates within the 5' UTR and requires the bypassing of a highly conserved termination codon preceding the single R2 open reading frame. This bypassing probably involves a conserved RNA secondary structure which brings a potential initiation codon into close proximity to this termination codon. The most highly conserved sequence within the 5' UTR has properties similar to internal ribosomal entry sites. Based on these findings, we propose that R2elements are co-transcribed with the 28S gene and are translated as part of a large ribosomal subunit.

The retrotransposons HeT-A, TART, and TAHRE, which maintain Drosophila telomeres, transpose specifically onto chromosome ends to form long arrays that extend the chromosome and compensate for terminal loss. Because they transpose by targetprimed reverse transcription, each element is oriented so that its 5′ end serves as the extreme end of the chromosome until another element transposes to occupy the terminal position. Thus 5′ sequences are at risk for terminal erosion while the element is at the chromosome end. Here we report that TART elements in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis show species-specific innovations in promoter architecture that buffer loss of sequence exposed at chromosome ends. The two elements have evolved different ways to effect this protection. The D. virilis TART (TART vir ) promoter is found in the 3′ UTR of the element directly upstream of the element transcribed. Transcription starts within the upstream element so that a "Tag" of extra sequence is added to the 5′ end of the newly transcribed RNA. This Tag provides expendable sequence to buffer end erosion of essential 5′ sequence after the RNA is reverse transcribed onto the chromosome. In contrast, the D. melanogaster TART (TART mel ) promoter initiates transcription deep within the 5′ UTR, but the element is able to replace and extend the 5′ UTR sequence by copying sequence from its 3′ UTR, we believe while being reverse transcribed onto the chromosome end. Astonishingly, end-protection in TART vir and HeT-A mel are essentially identical (using Tags), whereas HeT-A vir is clearly protected from end erosion by an as-yet-unspecified program.chromosome end protection | promoter evolution | pseudo-LTR promoter | perfect nonterminal repeat | antisense RNA