Background There is limited evidence to guide best approaches to supportive care delivery to patients with high-grade glioma. I-CoPE (Information, Coordination, Preparation and Emotional) is a structured supportive care approach for people with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma and their family carers. Delivered by a cancer care coordinator, I-CoPE consists of (1) staged information, (2) regular screening for needs, (3) communication and coordination, and (4) family carer engagement. This pilot study tested acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of I-CoPE, delivered over 3 transitions in the illness course, for people newly diagnosed with high-grade glioma and their carers. Methods I-CoPE was delivered at the identified transition times (at diagnosis, following the diagnostic hospitalization, following radiotherapy), with associated data collection (enrollment, 2 weeks, 12 weeks). Outcomes of interest included: acceptability/feasibility (primary); quality of life; needs for support; disease-related information needs; and carer preparedness to care (secondary). Descriptive statistics were used to assess acceptability outcomes, while patient and carer outcomes were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results Thirty-two patients (53% male, mean age 60) and 31 carers (42% male) participated. I-CoPE was highly acceptable: 86% of eligible patients enrolled, and of these 88% completed the study. Following I-CoPE patients and carers reported fewer information needs (P < .001), while carers reported fewer unmet supportive care needs (P < .01) and increased preparedness to care (P = .04). Quality of life did not significantly change. Conclusion A model of supportive care delivered based upon illness transitions is feasible, acceptable, and suggests preliminary efficacy in some areas. Formal randomized studies are now required.

Background Few supportive and palliative care interventions have been described for people with high-grade glioma (HGG) and their caregivers. A structured intervention, I-CoPE, which includes regular screening of patients’ and caregivers’ needs, was delivered as a pilot study in a tertiary neuro-oncological unit. This study prospectively described the severity and content of key concerns raised by patients and their caregivers in the 3 months following a diagnosis of HGG. Methods Consecutive patients and caregivers were screened for distress longitudinally using the Distress Thermometer at 3 time points. Exploration of the issues raised during screening was undertaken by the care coordinator and the issues documented. This documentation was subsequently audited to map patterns and nature of distress. The key reasons underlying distress and responses offered were grouped thematically and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Thirty-two patients and 31 caregivers were recruited and underwent screening. At diagnosis, 87% of caregivers (n = 27) and 60% of patients (n = 19) reported distress scores meeting clinical significance. The predominant concerns reported by patients during screening related to existential issues such as fear of dying, whereas caregivers were more focused on practical caring responsibilities. Over time, the reasons for distress changed to include more physical health concerns for patients and more psychological concerns for caregivers. Conclusions This prospective longitudinal descriptive study revealed that following a new diagnosis of HGG, patients and caregivers had changing needs for support and fluctuating distress, mirroring the illness trajectory. Palliative care needs were apparent from diagnosis, and early integration of palliative care should be considered.