To evaluate its role in protection, immune serum was collected from four macaques which were chronically infected with live attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmacC8) and had resisted challenge with wild-type SIVmacJ5. The immune serum was transferred to two naı$ ve cynomolgus macaques by intraperitoneal injection (11 ml/kg). Four control macaques received an intraperitoneal injection of normal saline. One day later, all macaques were challenged with 10 MID 50 of the J5M challenge stock of SIV. After challenge, all macaques became infected as determined by virus co-culture and diagnostic PCR. Virus loads in PBMC at 2 weeks post-challenge were indistinguishable between the two groups of macaques. Thus, the failure of passive immunization to transfer protection indicates that serum components alone are not sufficient to mediate the potent protection obtained using live attenuated vaccines. This is the first time that serum has been transferred from animals known to be protected against superinfection.
Inactivated, partially purified simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac) protected macaques from intravenous challenge with homologous and heterologous strains of SIV that had been grown on human cells but no protection against challenge with monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cell-grown SIVmac was afforded. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 prepared in an analogous way to the SIVmac vaccine on the C8166 human T cell line protected macaques against challenge with human cell-grown SIVmac. These results suggest that protection may be mediated by xenoimmunization with the vaccine cell substrate proteins. All vaccinated macaques had anti-cell antibodies. Major reactivity to MHC class I antigens was found as well as to a 70-kD protein detectable only under nonreducing conditions.
To determine the role that cellular immune responses play in the protection conferred by vaccination with attenuated SIVmac32H (pC8), we have attempted to deplete macaques of their CD8+ cells prior to challenge with wild-type SIVmac32H (pJ5). In two of four pC8-infected macaques, N109 and N112, a transient partial depletion of CD8+ cells by antibody treatment was achieved. On the day of challenge peripheral CD2+CD4-CD8+ cell counts were reduced by 92 and 95%, respectively, in animals N109 and N112 and their lymph nodes revealed a 46 and 58% reduction, respectively, in CD2+CD4-CD8+ cells. Two other pC8-immunized macaques, N110 and N111, treated in the same way, did not show significant depletion of CD8+ cells. None of these four pC8-immunized animals became infected when challenged with 50 MID50 of pJ5. Treatment of a further four pC8-infected and protected macaques and two naive control animals with Campath-1H antibody successfully depleted peripheral CD3+ cell counts by >99% in all treated animals. Campath-1H depletion resulted in enhanced, longer lasting lymphoid depletion. Yet subsequent challenge with 20 MID50 of pJ5 still failed to infect the pC8-immunized animals. All eight of the naive controls, including two Campath-1H-treated animals, became infected following challenge. In summary, partial depletion of circulating CD8+ cells or total lymphocytes prior to challenge failed to abrogate the protection conferred by vaccination with pC8.
In the first of two passive transfer experiments, three groups of four macaques were injected intraperitoneally with a normal serum pool, an immune serum pool (pool 1) collected 132-172 weeks postinfection with the 11/88 pool of SIVmac251, or with a pool of four neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (KK9, 17, 54, and 56) raised against gp120 of the 11/88 pool. Sera were given at a dose of 13 ml/kg whereas the MAb pool was given at 30 ml/kg. In a second experiment, a further four macaques were injected with an immune serum pool (pool 2) collected 12 weeks postinfection with simian-grown SIVmac251 at a dose of 19 ml/kg. Animals in both experiments were challenged with SIVmac251 grown in simian peripheral blood lymphocytes. Despite high levels of circulating antibodies in the serum of animals that received either the immune serum pools or the MAbs, all macaques became infected following challenge. The results described are in contrast to a previous report in which passive transfer of sera from animals infected with SIVsm successfully protected against challenge with the homologous virus grown in human PBMCs. Challenge with SIVmac251 grown in simian PBMCs may be the reason for these conflicting results. Nevertheless, the results suggest that in this model the presence of circulating neutralizing antibodies alone does not necessarily confer protection against challenge with SIVmac251 grown in simian cells.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope vaccines can now be evaluated for efficacy in macaques by challenging with chimeric viruses in which the env, tat and rev genes of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) have been replaced by those of HIV-1. Most experiments have so far been conducted using gp120 molecules derived from T-cell-adapted LAI or MN strains of HIV-1, which predominantly use the CXCR-4 co-receptor. These vaccines protect against infection by apathogenic chimeric virus carrying the same envelope sequences. In the experiment described here, four macaques were vaccinated with W61D gp120 derived from a low passage Dutch isolate and capable of inhibiting the binding of MIP1beta to the co-receptor CCR-5. This vaccine was potent, inducing high titres of binding and neutralizing antibodies against the homologous HIV-1 and tenfold lower titres against a heterologous challenge virus (SHIV(SF33)) in which the env, tat and rev genes of SIV had been replaced by those of a San Francisco isolate, HIV-1(SF33). Despite strong immune responses to the vaccine there was no evidence that it protected against challenge with this chimeric virus. The antigenic divergence between vaccine and challenge virus or the increased virulence of the challenge virus may be responsible for the inability of this vaccine to protect against infection by SHIV(SF33).
To determine whether attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccines confer protection against superinfection via secondary cellular immune responses, we searched for markers of immune activation following rechallenge. Productive infection with either attenuated SIVmacC8 or wild-type SIVmacJ5 resulted in a transient increase in T-lymphocyte CD25 and Mafa-DR expression. A pronounced increase in the frequency of FAS+ CD8+ lymphocytes was observed following SIVmacJ5 infection only. A transient increase in lymphocytes positive for intracellular IFN-gamma and IL-4 was observed following primary infection with either virus. In contrast, lymphocytes positive for intracellular IL-2 were reduced. Following SIVmacJ5 challenge of SIVmacC8-infected vaccinees, no evidence of detectable superinfection was obtained. Rechallenge of vaccinees did not alter the frequency of activated peripheral T-lymphocytes, perturb cytokine profiles, or generate an anamnestic antibody response. These data do not support the hypothesis that protection conferred by live attenuated SIV is mediated by the induction of vigorous T-cell responses upon rechallenge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.