An optional stopping experiment was performed in which the subject had to decide not only how much information to gather prior to making a two-choice decision, but also which of three information sources to consult. The cost of consulting these sources was varied systematically, with each source having a known, fixed diagnosticity. Two loss structures were used: (1) penalty for miss = penalty for false alarm, and (2) penalty for miss = 3 × penalty for false alarm. Results indicated subjects bought too little information relative to an optimal Bayesian model. The subjects indicated a reluctance to expend the resources required to obtain the best information available. Although subjects responded to the loss variables in the appropriate direction, they did not respond with sufficient magnitude to be mathematically optimal. Future research areas are suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.