To date, little research has focused directly on health-related support in school for children with a chronic illness or physical disability, yet these children are known to be at increased risk for psychosocial and academic problems. In addition, few studies have sought the views of pupils directly: those which have report a wide range of problems with school life. The increasing numbers of children surviving and managing their health conditions, together with UK policy for inclusive education, means that a growing proportion of pupils in mainstream schools require understanding of their special health needs and may need service support from education and health professionals. This paper presents findings from semistructured interviews with 33 mainstream secondary school pupils with a variety of illnesses and disabilities on the impact of their health condition on school life. Results show that young people valued school and were actively managing the effects of their condition, but needed support from others. Informal support was most frequently cited, including parents--particularly mothers--teachers and close friends. The main difficulties were implications of school absence, exclusion from school life, teachers' reactions to the illness or disability, and peer relationships. The discussion focuses on ways in which health professionals can play a part in supporting pupils both directly and indirectly, through helping others in school understand the condition and its impact on school life.
The research identified key components of the school nursing role and the complementary roles of nurses and school staff. To optimize school nurses' contribution to child health, a more strategic approach is required, in partnership with education, along with research into the effectiveness of school nursing interventions.
Many of the findings parallel the previous research with teachers, indicating agreement between professionals from different agencies about aspects of the communication process which are problematic and require attention. The findings suggest that improving communication requires both joint work between health and education staff, and improvements to practice within each agency.
The involvement of this group of children and young people in service development in the NHS is at an early stage. The failure of policy documents on user involvement to identify children and young people as a group for whom methods of consultation need to be developed, and the lack of people with designated responsibility for developing children's involvement may be a reason for slow progress in this area. The initiatives identified show that such involvement is possible and can have a positive impact on services.
Education policy favouring`inclusion', together with medical advances, mean that a growing number of pupils in mainstream schools may have health-related support needs in respect of a chronic illness or physical disability. Data from an empirical research study investigating these needs and carried out between 1996 and 1998 are used to re¯ect on the position of this group of pupils within policy guidance on special educational needs (SEN) and medical needs. Evidence of confusion and ambiguity, both in the guidance and its interpretation, suggests that the needs of this group remain somewhat hidden. More recent developments in special needs policy guidance are discussed in terms of the prospect for strengthening support for this group of pupils.
The National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 signalled an explicit shift away from a service-driven to a needs-led pattern of delivery for both health and social care. However, a definitive meaning of 'need' is elusive. Where the work of health and social care agencies is related closely, as in community care, recognition and careful handling of different approaches to need is important for effective inter-sectoral collaboration and supply of appropriate care to service users. This paper examines three dimensions of need: theory, policy and practice. Some key components of the theoretical debate about the meaning of 'need' are explored briefly, particularly in relation to health, and a set of questions is extracted that underpin the construction of need in policy and practice. These questions are then applied to a comparison of policy guidance documents for needs assessment for health and social (community) care. While the documents demonstrate some similarities in their view of need, there are also material differences. These differences have implications for the supply of services at the boundary between health and social care, some examples of which are discussed. Given a lack of consensus in defining and measuring need, the paper concludes with a framework of key questions which could enable purchasers and providers of health care to be more explicit about the bases upon which 'needs-led' services are defined and delivered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.