Fluoroquinolone-resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa may be due to efflux pump overexpression (EPO) and/or target mutations. EPO can result in multidrug resistance (MDR) due to broad substrate specificity of the pumps. MC-04,124, an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) shown to significantly potentiate activity of levofloxacin in P. aeruginosa, was used to examine the prevalence of EPO in clinical isolates. MICs were determined for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin with or without EPI and for other antipseudomonal agents by using broth microdilution against P. aeruginosa isolates from adults (n ؍ 119) and children (n ؍ 24). The prevalence of the EPO phenotype (>8-fold MIC decrease when tested with EPI) was compared among subgroups with different resistance profiles. The EPO phenotype was more prevalent among levofloxacinresistant than levofloxacin-sensitive strains (61%, 48/79 versus 9%, 6/64). EPO was present in 60% of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains without cross-resistance, while it was present at variable frequencies among strains with cross-resistance to other agents: piperacillin-tazobactam (86%), ceftazidime (76%), cefepime (65%), imipenem (56%), gentamicin (55%), tobramycin (48%), and amikacin (27%). The magnitude of MIC decrease with an EPI paralleled the frequency of which the EPO phenotype was observed in different subgroups. EPI reduced the levofloxacin MIC by as much as 16-fold in eight strains for which MICs were 128 g/ml. Efflux-mediated resistance appears to contribute significantly to fluoroquinolone resistance and MDR in P. aeruginosa. Our data support the fact that increased fluoroquinolone usage can negatively impact susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to multiple classes of antipseudomonal agents.
Over the past 20 years, the number of invasive fungal infections has continued to persist, due primarily to the increased numbers of patients subjected to severe immunosuppression. Despite the development of more active, less toxic antifungal agents and the standard use of antifungal prophylaxis, invasive fungal infections (especially invasive mold infections) continue to be a significant factor in hematopoietic cell and solid organ transplantation outcomes, resulting in high mortality rates. Since the use of fluconazole as standard prophylaxis in the hematopoietic cell transplantation setting, invasive candidiasis has come under control, but no mold-active antifungal agent (except for posaconazole in the setting of acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) has been shown to improve the survival rate over fluconazole. With the advent of new azole and echinocandin agents, we have seen the emergence of more azole-resistant and echinocandin-resistant fungi. The recent increase in zygomycosis seen in the hematopoietic cell transplantation setting may be due to the increased use of voriconazole. This has implications for the empiric approach to pulmonary invasive mold infections when zygomycosis cannot be ruled out. It is imperative that an amphotericin B product, an antifungal that has never developed resistance in over 50 years, be initiated. The clinical presentations of invasive mold infections and invasive candidiasis can be nonspecific and the diagnostic tests insensitive, so a high index of suspicion and immediate initiation of empiric therapy is required. Unfortunately, our currently available serologic tests do not predict infection ahead of disease, and, therefore cannot be used to initiate “preemptive” therapy. Also, the Aspergillus galactomannan test gives a false negative result in patients receiving antimold prophylaxis, ie, virtually all of our patients with hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. We may eventually be able to select patients at highest risk for invasive fungal infections for prophylaxis by genetic testing. However, with our current armamentarium of antifungal agents and widespread use of prophylaxis in high-risk groups (hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic cell transplantation), we continue to see high incidence and mortality rates, and our future hope lies in reversing the immunosuppression or augmenting the immune system of these severely immunocompromised hosts by developing and utilizing immunotherapy, immunoprophylaxis, and vaccines.
The frequency of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically in recent decades because of an expanding population at risk. Until now, treatment options for invasive mycoses have been primarily amphotericin B and the azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole. Traditional agents are limited by an inadequate spectrum of activity, drug resistance, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The recent approval of caspofungin and voriconazole clearly has expanded the number of existing antifungal drugs available. However, the enthusiasm that accompanies their availability is counterbalanced by limited clinical experience, high drug acquisition costs, and distinctive toxicities. The pharmacologic characteristics, extent of clinical experience (efficacy and toxicity), and drug acquisition costs among available systemic antifungal agents are compared, with emphasis on the new agents. Also, recommendations on the role of each agent are provided according to the most common indications for systemic antifungal therapy: invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and febrile neutropenia.
Standard voriconazole dosing using actual body weight in obese and overweight patients resulted in higher associated serum concentrations. Dosing using adjusted body weight may be necessary in this population in order to achieve optimal concentrations while preventing the potential for increased toxicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.