Objective Segmentation of thigh muscle and adipose tissue is important for the understanding of musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this work is (a) to evaluate whether a fully automated approach provides accurate segmentation of muscles and adipose tissue cross-sectional areas (CSA) compared with manual segmentation and (b) to evaluate the validity of this method based on a previous clinical study. Materials and methods The segmentation method is based on U-Net architecture trained on 250 manually segmented thighs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The clinical evaluation is performed on a hold-out test set bilateral thighs of 48 subjects with unilateral knee pain. Results The segmentation time of the method is < 1 s and demonstrated high agreement with the manual method (dice similarity coeffcient: 0.96 ± 0.01). In the clinical study, the automated method shows that similar to manual segmentation (− 5.7 ± 7.9%, p < 0.001, effect size: 0.69), painful knees display significantly lower quadriceps CSAs than contralateral painless knees (− 5.6 ± 7.6%, p < 0.001, effect size: 0.73). Discussion Automated segmentation of thigh muscle and adipose tissues has high agreement with manual segmentations and can replicate the effect size seen in a clinical study on osteoarthritic pain.

Objective To evaluate the agreement, accuracy, and longitudinal reproducibility of quantitative cartilage morphometry from 2D U-Net-based automated segmentations for 3T coronal fast low angle shot (corFLASH) and sagittal double echo at steady-state (sagDESS) MRI. Methods 2D U-Nets were trained using manual, quality-controlled femorotibial cartilage segmentations available for 92 Osteoarthritis Initiative healthy reference cohort participants from both corFLASH and sagDESS (n = 50/21/21 training/validation/test-set). Cartilage morphometry was computed from automated and manual segmentations for knees from the test-set. Agreement and accuracy were evaluated from baseline visits (dice similarity coefficient: DSC, correlation analysis, systematic offset). The longitudinal reproducibility was assessed from year-1 and -2 follow-up visits (root-mean-squared coefficient of variation, RMSCV%). Results Automated segmentations showed high agreement (DSC 0.89–0.92) and high correlations (r ≥ 0.92) with manual ground truth for both corFLASH and sagDESS and only small systematic offsets (≤ 10.1%). The automated measurements showed a similar test–retest reproducibility over 1 year (RMSCV% 1.0–4.5%) as manual measurements (RMSCV% 0.5–2.5%). Discussion The 2D U-Net-based automated segmentation method yielded high agreement compared with manual segmentation and also demonstrated high accuracy and longitudinal test–retest reproducibility for morphometric analysis of articular cartilage derived from it, using both corFLASH and sagDESS.