Highlights d TLR7, CYBB, RPS6KA3, BTK, and IL13RA1 can escape XCI in human pDCs d Female pDCs with escape from XCI have higher mRNA levels of the respective genes d pDCs with escape from XCI of TLR7 have higher IFNa/b mRNA levels
The topoisomerase IIalpha inhibitor etoposide is a 'broad spectrum' anticancer agent and a potent inducer of DNA double strand breaks. DNA damage response of mammalian cells usually involves cell cycle arrest and DNA repair or, if unsuccessful, cell death. We investigated these processes in the human colon cancer cell line HT-29 treated with three different etoposide regimens mimicking clinically relevant plasma concentrations of cancer patients. Each involved a period of drug-free incubation following etoposide exposure to imitate the decline of plasma levels between the cycles of chemotherapy. We found a massive induction of double strand breaks that were rapidly and nearly completely fixed long before the majority of cells underwent apoptosis or necrosis. An even greater percentage of cells lost clonogenicity. The occurrence of double strand breaks was accompanied by a decrease in the levels of Ku70, Ku86 and DNA-PK(cs) as well as an increase in the level of Rad51 protein. Twenty-four hours after the first contact with etoposide we found a pronounced G(2)/M arrest, regardless of the duration of drug exposure, the level of double strand breaks and the extent of their repair. During the subsequent drug-free incubation period, the loss of clonogenicity correlated well with the preceding G(2)/M arrest as well as with the amount of cell death found several days after exposure. However, it correlated neither with early apoptosis or necrosis nor with any of the other investigated parameters. These results suggest that the G(2)/M arrest is an important determinant in the cytostatic action of etoposide and that the removal of DNA double strand breaks is not sufficient to ensure cell survival.
For DNA targeting anticancer drugs, cellular DNA repair mechanisms may cause resistance and hamper the therapeutic outcome. DNA damage induced by topoisomerase IIα inhibitors like etoposide and anthracyclines, which are a mainstay of cancer therapy, is also repaired in many cell types, but the impact and precise mechanisms of this repair are still obscure. To investigate the DNA damage response of human adenocarcinoma HT29-cells to doxorubicin and to compare the involvement of Ku70 and Rad51 in the repair of doxorubicin- versus etoposide-induced DNA damage, we assessed cell cycle distribution and cell death, DNA damage, proteins relevant for repair by homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining, and clonogenicity following exposure to doxorubicin at clinically achievable concentrations. Also, we assessed changes in the repair kinetics after siRNA-mediated attenuation of Ku70 or Rad51 expression. We found that exposure to doxorubicin for 24 h induced a substantial amount of DNA damage that was largely repaired when doxorubicin was removed and the cells were maintained in drug-free medium. Nevertheless, a pronounced G(2)/M arrest occurred at times when repair was maximal. This was followed by a distinct increase in cell death and loss of clonogenicity. In this regard, responses to doxorubicin and etoposide were similar. However, distinct differences in the repair process following doxorubicin versus etoposide were seen in concentration dependency, time-course and requirement of Ku70 and Rad51 proteins. In spite of the shared molecular target of doxorubicin and etoposide, DNA lesions induced by these compounds are repaired differently.
Summary X-chromosomal genes escaping from X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in immune cells can contribute to sex-specific differences in immune responses. This protocol describes the specific steps to determine escape from XCI and to simultaneously quantify mRNA expression of multiple genes at the single immune cell level using a single-nucleotide polymorphism approach. The protocol furthermore allows the analysis of allele-specific expression of X-chromosomal genes. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Hagen et al. (2020) .
The crosstalk between NK cells and their surrounding environment is enabled through activating and inhibitory receptors, which tightly control NK cell activity. The co-inhibitory receptor TIGIT decreases NK cell cytotoxicity and is involved in NK cell exhaustion, but has also been associated with liver regeneration, highlighting that the contribution of human intrahepatic CD56bright NK cells in regulating tissue homeostasis remains incompletely understood. A targeted single-cell mRNA analysis revealed distinct transcriptional differences between matched human peripheral blood and intrahepatic CD56bright NK cells. Multiparameter flow cytometry identified a cluster of intrahepatic NK cells with overlapping high expression of CD56, CD69, CXCR6, TIGIT and CD96. Intrahepatic CD56bright NK cells also expressed significantly higher protein surface levels of TIGIT, and significantly lower levels of DNAM-1 compared to matched peripheral blood CD56bright NK cells. TIGIT+ CD56bright NK cells showed diminished degranulation and TNF-α production following stimulation. Co-incubation of peripheral blood CD56bright NK cells with human hepatoma cells or primary human hepatocyte organoids resulted in migration of NK cells into hepatocyte organoids and upregulation of TIGIT and downregulation of DNAM-1 expression, in line with the phenotype of intrahepatic CD56bright NK cells. Intrahepatic CD56bright NK cells represent a transcriptionally, phenotypically, and functionally distinct population of NK cells that expresses higher levels of TIGIT and lower levels of DNAM-1 than matched peripheral blood CD56bright NK cells. Increased expression of inhibitory receptors by NK cells within the liver environment can contribute to tissue homeostasis and reduction of liver inflammation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.