Background Long-term treatment with peritoneal dialysis (PD) results in peritoneal fibrosis. Peritoneal biopsies have been used to determine the severity of fibrosis. Ultrasonography (US) of the abdominal wall has been used to measure peritoneal thickness non-invasively. However, direct comparison of both methods in the same patient has never been done. Furthermore, the validity of US to measure peritoneal thickness has not been investigated. Methods We performed 3 studies: 1) a human biopsy study to compare US measurement of peritoneal thickness with histological examination; 2) a human cadaver study to investigate the effect of removing the peritoneum on US results; and 3) a phantom study in which we used US to measure the thickness of membrane-like structures with a known thickness to investigate the influence of different US settings. Results The median thickness in biopsies of the peritoneum was 113 μm (interquartile range [IQR] 72 –129 μm), while this was 370 μm (IQR 324 – 458 μm) when measured by US ( p < 0.0001). The mean difference between the 2 measures was -257 μm (limits of agreement -4.6 and -511 μm). In the cadaver study, removal of the peritoneum did not have an effect on the presence or thickness of the hyperechoic line reported to represent the peritoneum. In the phantom study, results were highly dependent on frequency of the transducer, scan depth, and gain settings. Conclusions Ultrasonography results differ markedly from histological measurement using peritoneal biopsies. However, the hyperechoic line generated by US represents the interface between 2 neighboring tissues and not a separate morphological structure. Moreover, its thickness is greatly influenced by user-defined US settings.

IntroductionEncapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a devastating complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The pathogenesis is not exactly known and no preventive strategy or targeted medical therapy is available. CCN2 has both pro-fibrotic and pro-angiogenic actions and appears an attractive target. Therefore, we studied peritoneal expression of CCN2, as well as TGFβ1 and VEGF, in different stages of peritoneal fibrosis.Materials and methodsSixteen PD patients were investigated and compared to 12 hemodialysis patients and four pre-emptively transplanted patients. Furthermore, expression was investigated in 12 EPS patients in comparison with 13 PD and 12 non-PD patients without EPS. Peritoneal tissue was taken during kidney transplantation procedure or during EPS surgery. In a subset of patients, CCN2 protein levels in peritoneal effluent and plasma were determined. Samples were examined by qPCR, histology, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA.ResultsPeritoneal CCN2 expression was 5-fold higher in PD patients compared to pre-emptively transplanted patients (P<0.05), but did not differ from hemodialysis patients. Peritoneal expression of TGFβ1 and VEGF were not different between the three groups; neither was peritoneal thickness. Peritoneum of EPS patients exhibited increased expression of CCN2 (35-fold, P<0.001), TGFβ1 (24-fold, P<0.05), and VEGF (77-fold, P<0.001) compared to PD patients without EPS. In EPS patients, CCN2 protein was mainly localized in peritoneal endothelial cells and fibroblasts. CCN2 protein levels were significantly higher in peritoneal effluent of EPS patients compared to levels in dialysate of PD patients (12.0±4.5 vs. 0.91±0.92 ng/ml, P<0.01), while plasma CCN2 levels were not increased.ConclusionsPeritoneal expression of CCN2, TGFβ1, and VEGF are significantly increased in EPS patients. In early stages of peritoneal fibrosis, only CCN2 expression is slightly increased. Peritoneal CCN2 overexpression in EPS patients is a locally driven response. The potential of CCN2 as biomarker and target for CCN2-inhibiting agents to prevent or treat EPS warrants further study.

No abstract

Post-transplantation EPS did not develop in this cohort of patients with a relatively short time of PD exposure. This suggests that these patients can be transplanted safely without concern for the development of EPS, at least within the follow-up period of 19 months.

Casuïstiekdecember 2021 HUISARTS EN WETENSCHAP Bij patiënten met recente hoofdpijn, visusklachten, kaakclaudicatio, haarkampijn, gewichtsverlies en verhoogde ontstekingswaarden mag de diagnose 'arteriitis temporalis' niet worden gemist. Een klinisch vermoeden op basis van anamnese en lichamelijk onderzoek is reden voor een spoedverwijzing, want zonder behandeling kan de aandoening leiden tot blijvende blindheid.