Background:CrossFit is a conditioning and training program that has been gaining recognition and interest among the physically active population. Approximately 440 certified and registered CrossFit fitness centers and gyms exist in Brazil, with approximately 40,000 athletes. To date, there have been no epidemiological studies about the CrossFit athlete in Brazil.Purpose:To evaluate the profile, sports history, training routine, and presence of injuries among athletes of CrossFit.Study Design:Descriptive epidemiological study.Methods:This cross-sectional study was based on a questionnaire administered to CrossFit athletes from various specialized fitness centers in Brazil. Data were collected from May 2015 to July 2015 through an electronic questionnaire that included demographic data, level of sedentary lifestyle at work, sports training history prior to starting CrossFit, current sports activities, professional monitoring, and whether the participants experienced any injuries while practicing CrossFit.Results:A total of 622 questionnaires were received, including 566 (243 women [42.9%] and 323 men [57.1%]) that were completely filled out and met the inclusion criteria and 9% that were incompletely filled out. Overall, 176 individuals (31.0%) mentioned having experienced some type of injury while practicing CrossFit. We found no significant difference in injury incidence rates regarding demographic data. There was no significant difference regarding previous sports activities because individuals who did not practice prior physical activity showed very similar injury rates to those who practiced at any level.Conclusion:CrossFit injury rates are comparable to those of other recreational or competitive sports, and the injuries show a profile similar to weight lifting, power lifting, weight training, Olympic gymnastics, and running, which have an injury incidence rate nearly half that of soccer.
Objective To determine whether type-II collagen degradation is determined by the type of sport. Carboxy-terminal telepoptide of type-II collagen (CTX-II), a serum biomarker of collagen degradation, was measured in athletes who play different sports, and was compared with matched controls. Methods The sample size consisted of 70 female participants aged between 18 and 25 years, 15 of whom were members of a soccer team, 10 of a futsal (a variant of association football played on a hard court) team, 10 of a handball team, 18 of a volleyball team, and 7 of a swimming team. A total of 9 age- and sex-matched individuals with sedentary lifestyles were included in the control group. 3-mL blood samples were collected from each participant, and they were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results A comparison of the CTX-II concentrations of the players of different sports with those of the control group resulted in the following p -values: volleyball ( p = 0.21); soccer ( p = 0.91); handball ( p = 0.13); futsal ( p = 0.02); and swimming ( p = 0.0015). Therefore, in the investigated population, futsal represented the highest risk for type-II collagen degradation and, consequently, for articular cartilage degradation, whereas swimming was a protective factor for the articular cartilage. No statistically significant difference was found in the body mass index among the groups. Conclusion Futsal players are exposed to greater articular degradation, while swimmers exhibited less cartilage degradation compared with the control group in the study population, suggesting that strengthening the periarticular muscles and aerobic exercise in low-load environments has a positive effect on the articular cartilage.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical results of the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by transtibial, transportal, and outside-in techniques.MethodsThis was a retrospective study on 90 patients (ACL reconstruction with autologous flexor tendons) operated between August 2009 and June 2012, by the medial transportal (30), transtibial (30), and “outside-in” (30) techniques. The following parameters were assessed: objective and subjective IKDC, Lysholm, KT1000, Lachman test, Pivot-Shift and anterior drawer test.ResultsOn physical examination, the Lachman test and Pivot-Shift indicated a slight superiority of the outside-in technique, but without statistical significance (p = 0.132 and p = 0.186 respectively). The anterior drawer, KT1000, subjective IKDC, Lysholm, and objective IKDC tests showed similar results in the groups studied. A higher number of complications were observed in the medial transportal technique (p = 0.033).ConclusionThere were no statistically significant differences in the clinical results of patients undergoing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by transtibial, medial transportal, and outside-in techniques.
Complete echocardiogram-No structural abnormalities and normal systolic function Cardiac CTA-4 cm long myocardial bridge in the mid LAD with 30% reduction in diameter as compared to the LAD distal to the bridge-Large diagonal system arises proximal to the bridge and supplies the majority of the anterolateral wall-No evidence of anomalous coronary origins or atherosclerotic plaque Cardiac MRI-No myocarditis, normal biventricular function, no late gadolinium enhancement or scar Exercise stress test-Chest pain reproduced at peak exercise level-No EKG evidence of ischemia-Otherwise normal stress test FINAL/WORKING DIAGNOSIS:Long LAD myocardial bridge, presumed etiology of ischemia TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES:1. Medical management with metoprolol, dose titrated to 75mg daily. 2. Repeat exercise stress test and stress echo normal. Chest pain not reproduced at peak exercise level. 3. Thorough discussion of potential risks associated with strenuous physical activity. Through shared decision making, the patient opted to continue playing basketball. Has returned to his previous level of play and has not had recurrence of symptoms to date.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.