No abstract

Background Aortic disease is a key determinant of outcomes in Turner syndrome (TS). The present study characterized aortic growth rates and outcomes over nearly a decade in adult women with TS. Methods and results Prospective observational study assessing aortic diameters twice with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in women with TS [N = 91; mean follow-up 8.8 ± 3.3 (range 1.6–12.6) years] and healthy age-matched female controls [N = 37; mean follow-up 6.7 ± 0.5 (range 5.9–8.1) years]. Follow-up also included aortic outcomes and mortality, antihypertensive treatment and ambulatory blood pressure. Aortic growth rates were similar or smaller in TS, but the variation was larger. The proximal aorta in TS grew by 0.20 ± 0.26 (mid-ascending) to 0.32 ± 0.36 (sinuses) mm/year. This compared to 0.26 ± 0.14 (mid-ascending) and 0.32 ± 0.17 (sinuses) mm/year in the controls. During 799 years at risk, 7 suffered an aortic outcome (1 aortic death, 2 aortic dissections, 2 aortic interventions, 2 surgical aortic listings) with further 2 aortic valve replacements. At baseline, two women were excluded. One died during subacute aortic surgery (severe dilatation) and one had a previously undetected type A dissection. The combined aortic outcome rate was 1126 per 100 000 observation years. The aortic and all-cause mortality rates were 1 per 799 years (125 deaths per 100 000 observation years) and 9 per 799 years (1126 deaths per 100 000 observation years). Aortic growth patterns were particularly perturbed in bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and aortic coarctation (CoA). Conclusion Aortic growth rates in TS are not increased. BAVs and CoA are major factors that impact aortic growth. Aortic outcomes remain a concern.

Turner syndrome is caused by complete or partial X monosomy in some or all cells. Cardiovascular complications are dominant, including increased blood pressure (BP), leading to early-onset hypertension. The aim is to describe the debut, development, and treatment of hypertension in Turner syndrome during a 12-year pragmatic interventional study to help identify risk factors associated with hypertension. One hundred and two women (aged 38±11 years, range: 18–62 years) with Turner syndrome verified by karyotyping (45, X: n=58 [57%]) were included consecutively. Ambulatory BPs were recorded over 24 hours with oscillometric measurements every 20 minutes. Antihypertensive treatment was recommended if the BP was above 135/85 mm Hg during the daytime. Overall, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure increased during the study, while heart rate decreased. The number of patients treated with antihypertensive medicine increased from 29 (28.71%) at baseline to 34 (53.13%) at the end of study. Twenty-four–hour systolic BP and 24-hour pulse pressure increased significantly with age, while 24-hour heart rate decreased with age, and diastolic BP was insignificantly affected by age. Antihypertensive treatment lowered systolic BP (24-hour: −5 mm Hg), diastolic BP (24-hour: −5 mm Hg), and diminished the pulse pressure (24-hour: −6 mm Hg) but did not affect nighttime systolic BP. Antihypertensive treatment did not affect heart rate. Our study showed that both systolic and diastolic BP increases significantly in women with Turner syndrome resulting in an increased risk of cardiovascular comorbidities. This increment should be considered of multifactorial origin with many contributing factors which is supported by our results.

BackgroundWomen with Turner Syndrome have an increased risk for aortic dissection. Arterial stiffening is a risk factor for aortic dilatation and dissection. Here we investigate if arterial stiffening can be observed in Turner Syndrome patients and is an initial step in the development of aortic dilatation and subsequent dissection.MethodsFifty-seven women with Turner Syndrome (48 years [29–66]) and thirty-six age- and sex-matched controls (49 years [26–68]) were included. Distensibility, blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the augmentation index (Aix) and central blood pressure were determined using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, a 24-h blood pressure measurement and applanation tonometry. Aortic distensibility was determined at three locations: ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and descending aorta.ResultsMean aortic distensibility in the descending aorta was significantly lower in Turner Syndrome compared to healthy controls (P = 0.02), however, this was due to a much lower distensibility among Turner Syndrome with coarctation, while Turner Syndrome without coarctation had similar distensibility as controls. Both the mean heart rate adjusted Aix (31.4% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.02) and central diastolic blood pressure (78.8 mmHg vs. 73.7 mmHg; P = 0.02) were higher in Turner Syndrome compared to controls, and these indices correlated significantly with ambulatory night-time diastolic blood pressure. The presence of aortic coarctation (r = − 0.44, P = 0.005) and a higher central systolic blood pressure (r = − 0.34, P = 0.03), age and presence of diabetes were inversely correlated with aortic distensibility in TS.ConclusionAortic wall function in the descending aorta is impaired in Turner Syndrome with lower distensibility among those with coarctation of the aorta, and among all Turner Syndrome higher Aix, and elevated central diastolic blood pressure when compared to sex- and age-matched controls.Trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01678274) on September 3, 2012.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12968-018-0497-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bladder neck contracture following transurethral resection of the prostate is a rare but feared complication. Treatment is often challenging with significant recurrence rates. In this report, we present a complicated case treated with a simple procedure. A 75-year-old male developed urinary retention due to bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of the prostate. He was initially treated with several transurethral incisions, but the obstruction recurred few months after each incision. At urethroscopy, the bladder neck was completely obstructed. Using both retrograde and antegrade endoscopy, it was possible to place a through-and-through guidewire, after which the length of the stricture could be measured. Subsequently, the stricture was slightly dilated, and a double-cone thermo-expandable metal stent (Memokath 045) could be placed. The correct position was monitored with antegrade and retrograde endoscopy, securing the proximal cone expanded above the stricture and the distal cone above the sphincter. The patient was discharged the same day with spontaneous voiding and minimal residual urine. Twenty-one months after stent placement, the patient still had no complaints of his urination. Thus, the double-cone thermo-expandable metal stent, Memokath 045, may be a durable option for treatment of complicated bladder neck contracture after TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia.