The discrepancy between the analytically determined buckling load of perfect cylindrical shells and experimental test results is traced back to imperfections. The most frequently used guideline for design of cylindrical shells, NASA SP-8007, proposes a deterministic calculation of a knockdown factor with respect to the ratio of radius and wall thickness, which turned out to be very conservative in numerous cases and which is not intended for composite shells. In order to determine a lower bound for the buckling load of an arbitrary type of shell, probabilistic design methods have been developed. Measured imperfection patterns are described using double Fourier series, whereas the Fourier coefficients characterize the scattering of geometry. In this paper, probabilistic analyses of buckling loads are performed regarding Fourier coefficients as random variables. A nonlinear finite element model is used to determine buckling loads, and Monte Carlo simulations are executed. The probabilistic approach is used for a set of six similarly manufactured composite shells. The results indicate that not only geometric but also nontraditional imperfections like loading imperfections have to be considered for obtaining a reliable lower limit of the buckling load. Finally, further Monte Carlo simulations are executed including traditional as well as loading imperfections, and lower bounds of buckling loads are obtained, which are less conservative than NASA SP-8007.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.