BACKGROUND Data are lacking on whether lenalidomide maintenance therapy prolongs the time to disease progression after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS Between April 2005 and July 2009, we randomly assigned 460 patients who were younger than 71 years of age and had stable disease or a marginal, partial, or complete response 100 days after undergoing stem-cell transplantation to lenalidomide or placebo, which was administered until disease progression. The starting dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg per day (range, 5 to 15). RESULTS The study-drug assignments were unblinded in 2009, when a planned interim analysis showed a significantly longer time to disease progression in the lenalidomide group. At unblinding, 20% of patients who received lenalidomide and 44% of patients who received placebo had progressive disease or had died (P<0.001); of the remaining 128 patients who received placebo and who did not have progressive disease, 86 crossed over to lenalidomide. At a median follow-up of 34 months, 86 of 231 patients who received lenalidomide (37%) and 132 of 229 patients who received placebo (58%) had disease progression or had died. The median time to progression was 46 months in the lenalidomide group and 27 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). A total of 35 patients who received lenalidomide (15%) and 53 patients who received placebo (23%) died (P=0.03). More grade 3 or 4 hematologic adverse events and grade 3 non-hematologic adverse events occurred in patients who received lenalidomide (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Second primary cancers occurred in 18 patients who received lenalidomide (8%) and 6 patients who received placebo (3%). CONCLUSIONS Lenalidomide maintenance therapy, initiated at day 100 after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, was associated with more toxicity and second cancers but a significantly longer time to disease progression and significantly improved overall survival among patients with myeloma. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114101.)

Multiple aldehyde dehydrogenase genes have been identified in many tissues. Aldehyde dehydrogenase class 1A1 (ALDH1A1) has been identified as highly expressed in embryonal tissue as well as in adult stem cells isolated from bone marrow, brain, breast and possibly other tissues. The recent interest in the idea of cancer stem cells (CSC) has resulted in renewed and vigorous interest in aldehyde dehydrogenase activity as a marker for those stem cells as well. It has been known that ALDH activity, which may reflect other ALDH isozymes in addition to ALDH1A1, is important for multiple biological activities including drug resistance, cell differentiation, and oxidative stress response. Purification of viable cells with high ALDH activity has become relatively easy with the availability of flow cytometry based assay. In this review, we examine the data available in regarding the importance of ALDH activity in normal and malignant stem cell functions, and the potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications. We review the available tools that can impact ALDH activity and may have the potential to be used therapeutically, specifically targeting the CSC. We raise questions that need to be investigated before a reasonable therapeutic strategy can be devised that will effectively inhibit ALDH activity.

No abstract

There has been a new interest in using aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity as one marker for stem cells since the Aldefluor flow cytometry-based assay has become available. Diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), used in the Aldeflour assay, has been considered a specific inhibitor for ALDH1A1 isoform. In this study, we explore the effects of human ALDH isoenzymes, ALDH1A2 and ALDH2, on drug resistance and proliferation, and the specificity of DEAB as an inhibitor. We also screened for the expression of 19 ALDH isoenzymes in K562 cells using TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA). We used lentiviral vectors containing the full cDNA length of either ALDH2 or ALDH1A2 to over express the enzymes in K562 leukemia and H1299 lung cancer cell lines. Successful expression was measured by activity assay, Western blot, RT-PCR, and Aldefluor assay. Both cell lines, with either ALDH1A2 or ALDH2, exhibited higher cell proliferation rates, higher clonal efficiency, and increased drug resistance to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. In order to study the specificity of known ALDH activity inhibitors, DEAB and disulfiram, we incubated each cell line with either inhibitor and measured the remaining ALDH enzymatic activity. Both inhibitors reduced ALDH activity of both isoenzymes by 65–90%. Furthermore, our TLDA results revealed that ALDH1, ALDH7, ALDH3 and ALDH8 are expressed in K562 cells. We conclude that DEAB is not a specific inhibitor for ALDH1A1 and that Aldefluor assay is not specific for ALDH1A1 activity. In addition, other ALDH isoenzymes seem to play a major role in the biology and drug resistance of various malignant cells.

No abstract