In recent years, borders between countries have been opened gradually thanks to globalization, which is reflected in minimal barriers to the movement of persons and capital. This situation could be potentially abused by taxpayers willing to shift the capital to preferential tax jurisdictions. Due to facts aforementioned, several instruments for tax administrators have been introduced. Bilateral and multilateral instruments are concluded with particular countries for the purpose of obtaining information about foreign residents staying abroad but also to avoid double taxation or double non-taxation. In recent years there has been an increased number of companies in the Czech Republic whose owners come from preferential tax jurisdiction from 12,676 up to 13,167. This paper is focused on the Czech taxpayers' reaction on concluding agreements concerning exchange of information in tax matters with preferential tax jurisdictions, the so-called "Tax havens". The Difference-in-Differences Method was carried out to predict the taxpayers' behavior. The model shows that the agreements work well as a preventive tool. If the Czech Republic concludes the agreement with the tax haven, the taxpayers lose their anonymity. This results in their relocation into tax havens that are not covered by the agreement in order to keep their anonymity.
There are many studies focusing on VAT (value added tax) tax gap but very few relevant studies that deal with the corporate income tax loss. The studies vary particularly in their methodology, databases and interpretation. In the case of the Czech Republic the studies resulted in a range between CZK 57 billion tax gap and CZK 12.5 billion corporate tax revenue gain caused by the tax planning. The main aim of the paper is to calculate the corporate income tax effi ciency rate for the Czech Republic and compare it with other member states. The indicator of corporate income tax effi ciency is important for the calculation of the tax revenue without profi t shifting (RWS) indicator and then the subsequent corporate income tax gap estimation for 2013-2015, which is the second goal of the paper. The RWS indicator gives an overview of the Czech Republic´s amount of loses/ gains relating to the corporate tax base erosion and corporate profi t shifting. In the case when the actual corporate income tax revenue takes a higher value than the revenue without profi t shifting indicator the jurisdiction benefi ts from the profi t shifting operations. The opposite situation results in tax revenue losses caused by profi t shifting to other "more attractive" tax jurisdictions. Authors' study re-estimation results in approximately CZK 9.404 billion tax gap caused by base erosion and profi t shifting instead of 12.5 billion CZK that shows EPRS's study for period 2013. The third aim of the paper is to deal with the difference between input data from Eurostat database and offi cial data from General Financial Directorate.
When choosing the appropriate jurisdiction, trading companies need to consider many variables. This can include administrative burdens, the speed of establishment of a company, the granting of some degree of anonymity of ownership, and a friendly tax environment. This article is focused on finding the corporate effective tax rate in the Czech Republic in the period 2005–2017 with the database of the Czech tax administrator. In the light of the international tax law, the information concerning effective tax rates becoming necessary. The results of this study show that the nominal tax rate may not be decisive for the determination of the tax burden, as most countries allow the application of tax allowances and deductions and thus achieve virtually lower taxes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.