DFTB+ is a versatile community developed open source software package offering fast and efficient methods for carrying out atomistic quantum mechanical simulations. By implementing various methods approximating density functional theory (DFT), such as the density functional based tight binding (DFTB) and the extended tight binding method, it enables simulations of large systems and long timescales with reasonable accuracy while being considerably faster for typical simulations than the respective ab initio methods. Based on the DFTB framework, it additionally offers approximated versions of various DFT extensions including hybrid functionals, time dependent formalism for treating excited systems, electron transport using non-equilibrium Green’s functions, and many more. DFTB+ can be used as a user-friendly standalone application in addition to being embedded into other software packages as a library or acting as a calculation-server accessed by socket communication. We give an overview of the recently developed capabilities of the DFTB+ code, demonstrating with a few use case examples, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the various features, and also discuss on-going developments and possible future perspectives.
With numerous new quantum chemistry methods being developed in recent years and the promise of even more new methods to be developed in the near future, it is clearly critical that highly accurate, well-balanced, reference data for many different atomic and molecular properties be available for the parametrization and validation of these methods. One area of research that is of particular importance in many areas of chemistry, biology, and material science is the study of noncovalent interactions. Because these interactions are often strongly influenced by correlation effects, it is necessary to use computationally expensive high-order wave function methods to describe them accurately. Here, we present a large new database of interaction energies calculated using an accurate CCSD(T)/CBS scheme. Data are presented for 66 molecular complexes, at their reference equilibrium geometries and at 8 points systematically exploring their dissociation curves; in total, the database contains 594 points: 66 at equilibrium geometries, and 528 in dissociation curves. The data set is designed to cover the most common types of noncovalent interactions in biomolecules, while keeping a balanced representation of dispersion and electrostatic contributions. The data set is therefore well suited for testing and development of methods applicable to bioorganic systems. In addition to the benchmark CCSD(T) results, we also provide decompositions of the interaction energies by means of DFT-SAPT calculations. The data set was used to test several correlated QM methods, including those parametrized specifically for noncovalent interactions. Among these, the SCS-MI-CCSD method outperforms all other tested methods, with a root-mean-square error of 0.08 kcal/mol for the S66 data set.
We evaluate the performance of the most widely used wavefunction, density functional theory, and semiempirical methods for the description of noncovalent interactions in a set of larger, mostly dispersion-stabilized noncovalent complexes (the L7 data set). The methods tested include MP2, MP3, SCS-MP2, SCS(MI)-MP2, MP2.5, MP2.X, MP2C, DFT-D, DFT-D3 (B3-LYP-D3, B-LYP-D3, TPSS-D3, PW6B95-D3, M06-2X-D3) and M06-2X, and semiempirical methods augmented with dispersion and hydrogen bonding corrections: SCC-DFTB-D, PM6-D, PM6-DH2 and PM6-D3H4. The test complexes are the octadecane dimer, the guanine trimer, the circumcoronene…adenine dimer, the coronene dimer, the guanine-cytosine dimer, the circumcoronene…guanine-cytosine dimer, and an amyloid fragment trimer containing phenylalanine residues. The best performing method is MP2.5 with relative root mean square deviation (rRMSD) of 4 %. It can thus be recommended as an alternative to the CCSD(T)/CBS (alternatively QCISD(T)/CBS) benchmark for molecular systems which exceed current computational capacity. The second best non-DFT method is MP2C with rRMSD of 8 %. A method with the most favorable “accuracy/cost” ratio belongs to the DFT family: BLYP-D3, with an rRMSD of 8 %. Semiempirical methods deliver less accurate results (the rRMSD exceeds 25 %). Nevertheless, their absolute errors are close to some much more expensive methods such as M06-2X, MP2 or SCS(MI)-MP2, and thus their price/performance ratio is excellent.
In the past several years, halogen bonds have been shown to be relevant in crystal engineering and biomedical applications. One of the reasons for the utility of these types of noncovalent interactions in the development of, for example, pharmaceutical ligands is that their strengths and geometric properties are very tunable. That is, substitution of atoms or chemical groups in the vicinity of a halogen can have a very strong effect on the strength of the halogen bond. In this study we investigate halogen-bonding interactions involving aromatically-bound halogens (Cl, Br, and I) and a carbonyl oxygen. The properties of these halogen bonds are modulated by substitution of aromatic hydrogens with fluorines, which are very electronegative. It is found that these types of substitutions have dramatic effects on the strengths of the halogen bonds, leading to interactions that can be up to 100% stronger. Very good correlations are obtained between the interaction energies and the magnitudes of the positive electrostatic potentials (σ-holes) on the halogens. Interestingly, it is seen that the substitution of fluorines in systems containing smaller halogens results in electrostatic potentials resembling those of systems with larger halogens, with correspondingly stronger interaction energies. It is also shown that aromatic fluorine substitutions affect the optimal geometries of the halogen-bonded complexes, often as the result of secondary interactions.
Semiempirical methods could offer a feasible compromise between ab initio and empirical approaches for the calculation of large molecules with biological relevance. A key problem for attempts in this direction is the rather bad performance of current semiempirical methods for noncovalent interactions, especially hydrogen-bonding. On the basis of the recently introduced PM6-DH method, which includes empirical corrections for dispersion (D) and hydrogen-bond (H) interactions, we have developed an improved and transferable H-bonding correction for semiempirical quantum chemical methods. The performance of the improved correction is evaluated for PM6, AM1, OM3, and SCC-DFTB (enhanced by standard empirical dispersion corrections) with several test sets for noncovalent interactions and is shown to reach the quality of current DFT-D approaches for these types of problems.
We present an extension to the recent 3OB parametrization of the Density Functional Tight Binding Model DFTB31,2 for biological and organic systems. Parameters for the halogens F, Cl, Br, and I have been developed for use in covalently bound systems and benchmarked on a test set of 106 molecules (the ‘OrgX’ set), using bonding distances, bonding angles, atomization energies, and vibrational frequencies to assess the performance of the parameters. Additional testing has been done with the X40 set of 40 supramolecular systems containing halogens,3 adding a simple correction for the halogen bonds that are strongly overbound in DFTB3. Furthermore, parameters for Ca, K, and Na as counterions in biological systems have been created. To benchmark geometries as well as ligand binding energies a test set ‘BioMe’ of 210 molecules has been created that cover coordination to various functional groups frequently occurring in biological systems. The new DFTB3/3OB parameter set outperforms DFT calculations with a double-ζ basis set in terms of energies and can reproduce DFT geometries, with some minor deviations in bond distances and angles due to the use of a minimal basis set.
Semiempirical quantum mechanical methods with corrections for noncovalent interactions, namely dispersion and hydrogen bonds, reach an accuracy comparable to much more expensive methods while being applicable to very large systems (up to 10 000 atoms). These corrections have been successfully applied in computer-assisted drug design, where they significantly improve the correlation with the experimental data. Despite these successes, there are still several unresolved issues that limit the applicability of these methods. We introduce a new generation of both hydrogen-bonding and dispersion corrections that address these problems, make the method more robust, and improve its accuracy. The hydrogen-bonding correction has been completely redesigned and for the first time can be used for geometry optimization and molecular-dynamics simulations without any limitations, as it and its derivatives have a smooth potential energy surface. The form of this correction is simpler than its predecessors, while the accuracy has been improved. For the dispersion correction, we adopt the latest developments in DFT-D, using the D3 formalism by Grimme. The new corrections have been parametrized on a large set of benchmark data including nonequilibrium geometries, the S66x8 data set. As a result, the newly developed D3H4 correction can accurately describe a wider range of interactions. We have parametrized this correction for the PM6, RM1, OM3, PM3, AM1, and SCC-DFTB methods.
We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the "gold standard" of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.