Objective To examine risk of malignancy and death in patients with kidney transplant who receive the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2013.Eligibility Randomized controlled trials comparing immunosuppressive regimens with and without sirolimus in recipients of kidney or combined pancreatic and renal transplant for which the author was willing to provide individual patient level data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full text reports of potentially eligible trials to identify studies for inclusion. All eligible trials reported data on malignancy or survival. Results The search yielded 2365 unique citations. Patient level data were available from 5876 patients from 21 randomized trials. Sirolimus was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of malignancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93) and a 56% reduction in the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (0.44, 0.30 to 0.63) compared with controls. The most pronounced effect was seen in patients who converted to sirolimus from an established immunosuppressive regimen, resulting in a reduction in risk of malignancy (0.34, 0.28 to 0.41), non-melanoma skin cancer (0.32, 0.24 to 0.42), and other cancers (0.52, 0.38 to 0.69). Sirolimus was associated with an increased risk of death (1.43, 1.21 to 1.71) compared with controls.Conclusions Sirolimus was associated with a reduction in the risk of malignancy and non-melanoma skin cancer in transplant recipients. The benefit was most pronounced in patients who converted from an established immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus. Given the risk of mortality, however, the use of this drug does not seem warranted for most patients with kidney transplant. Further research is needed to determine if different populations, such as those at high risk of cancer, might benefit from sirolimus.

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have a 50-200-fold higher risk for nonmelanoma-skin cancer (NMSC) causing high rates of morbidity and sometimes mortality. Cohort-studies gave evidence that a sirolimusbased immunosuppression may inhibit skin tumor growth. This single-center, prospective, assessorblinded, randomized trial investigated if switching to sirolimus treatment inhibits the progression of premalignancies and moreover how many new NMSC occur compared to continuation of the original immunosuppressive therapy. Forty-four RTR (mean age 59.9 years, mean duration of immunosuppression 229.5 months) with skin lesions were randomized to sirolimus or continuation of their original immunosuppression. Blinded dermatological assessment at month 6 and 12 by the same dermatologist evaluated the clinical change compared to baseline. Biopsy was performed in suspected malignancy. Already the 6-month-assessment showed significant superiority of sirolimus-therapy: a stop of progression, even regression of preexisting premalignancies (p < 0.0005). This effect was increased at month 12 (p < 0.0001). Nine patients developed histologically confirmed NMSC: one in the sirolimus group, eight in the control group, p = 0.0176. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression in RTR, even when established many years after transplantation, can delay the development of premalignancies, induce regression of preexisting lesions and decelerate the incidence of new NMSC.

Live kidney donation is increasing rapidly. Increases of blood pressure and proteinuria but no accelerated loss of renal function in kidney donors have been described. The credibility of this research is hampered by retrieval rates of only 50-70% of donors.We studied renal function, blood pressure, proteinuria, parathyroid hormone, 1,25(OH) 2 cholecalciferol and calcium and phosphate excretion in a live kidney donor cohort with a 93% retrieval rate. A comprehensive physical and laboratory examination including 24-h urine collection was conducted. None of the 152 donors had renal failure. Mean time after uninephrectomy was 11 ± 7 (range: 1-28) years. GFR had declined by 25%. Blood pressure had increased from 125 ± 15/79 ± 11 to 134 ± 19/81 ± 9 mmHg (p < 0.01) but remained significantly below normal. Fifty six percent of donors developed proteinuria (>150 mg/day), but only 10% had albuminuria. Nineteen percent had increased PTH, 30% had a decreased tubular reabsorption rate of phosphate. Regarding risk factors for a higher loss of GFR, greater increases in blood pressure or proteinuria no consistent picture emerged. Because of the high incidence of proteinuria and possible changes in bone metabolism inclusion of kidney donors in registries appears worthwhile.

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a severe complication in organ transplantation because it leads to impaired renal function and chronic allograft nephropathy, which is a major predictor of graft loss. Animal models and in vivo studies indicate that the transmembrane efflux pump P-glycoprotein contributes substantially to CsA nephrotoxicity. It was hypothesized that the TT genotype at the ABCB1 3435C3 T polymorphism, which is associated with decreased expression of P-glycoprotein in renal tissue, is a risk factor for developing CsA nephrotoxicity. In a case-control study, 18 of 97 patients developed CsA nephrotoxicity and showed complete recovery of renal function in all cases when switched to a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. Both recipients and donors were genotyped for ABCB1 polymorphisms at the positions 3435C3 T and 2677G3 T/A. For controlling for population stratification, two additional polymorphisms, CYP2D6*4 and CYP3A5*3, with intermediate allelic frequencies were studied. The P-glycoprotein low expressor genotype 3435TT only of renal organ donors but not of the recipients was overrepresented in patients with CsA nephrotoxicity as compared with patients without toxicity ( 2 ‫؍‬ 10.5; P ‫؍‬ 0.005). CsA dosage, trough levels, and the concentration per dose ratio were not different between the patient groups. In a multivariate model that included several other nongenetic covariates, only the donor's ABCB1 3435TT genotype was strongly associated with CsA nephrotoxicity (odds ratio, 13.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 148; P ‫؍‬ 0.034). A dominant role of the donor's ABCB1 genotype was identified for development of CsA nephrotoxicity. This suggests that P-glycoprotein is an important factor in CsA nephrotoxicity.

Ang II increases EPO levels in humans. This increase requires the participation of AT1R.

No abstract

Summary Relapse of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after renal transplantation is 20–40%. Recurrence after a first relapse is 80%. The only current treatment is plasmapheresis and/or cyclophosphamide. We report successful treatment of a second relapse in a 48‐year‐old patient. At age 33, FSGS was diagnosed. The patient began hemodialysis 1 year later. In her first renal transplant, she developed recurrent FSGS and reached terminal transplant failure 3 years later. Eight years later, a second transplant was performed. Immunosuppressive regimen: steroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus (TAC), and rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin. Proteinuria of 2–6 g/day was detected and a biopsy showed recurrent FSGS. Plasmapheresis was started without success. Another biopsy still showed FSGS. The patient received two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2 each) i.v. Three weeks later, proteinuria was 350 mg/day (serum‐creatinine 1.6 mg/dl). Twelve months later, proteinuria was at 90 mg/day. Rituximab might be an option for recurrent FSGS after renal transplantation.

To delineate the pathogenesis of the reduction in hemoglobin occurring in renal transplant patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and azathioprine (AZA) a controlled, prospective trial of ACEI withdrawal was conducted. The ACEI was replaced by nifedipine or clonidine in 15 kidney transplant patients immunosuppressed with AZA and prednisone (enalapril in 14 and captopril in 1). Before and during 10 to 12 weeks after withdrawal of the ACEI, AZA metabolites, renal function parameters and hematological parameters including erythropoietin and reticulocytes were evaluated. Enalaprilat levels were measured and compared with 15 similar patients matched for transplant function and enalapril dosage immunosuppressed with cyclosporine and prednisone. AZA metabolites did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of the ACEI. Enalaprilat levels also showed no significant difference between the two patient groups treated with AZA or cyclosporine. Hematocrit and hemoglobin increased significantly from 37.5 +/- 6.4 to 39.7 +/- 3.6% (mean +/- SD, P = 0.02) and 12.8 +/- 2.2 to 13.5 +/- 1.2 g/dl, P = 0.04, respectively, 10 to 12 weeks after ACEI treatment had been discontinued. Simultaneously numbers of reticulocytes and erythropoietin concentrations rose significantly after 2, 4 and 10 weeks, with a peak at two weeks (from 14.1 +/- 3.8 to 20.6 +/- 8.0/1000, P < 0.05 and from 14.3 +/- 12.4 to 29.3 +/- 54.5 mU/ml, P < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, ACEI-related anemia in renal transplant recipients seems to be due to the erythropoietin-lowering effect of this group of drugs. A pharmacokinetic interaction between AZA and enalapril is not likely since plasma enalaprilat levels were independent of the immunosuppressive regimen and AZA metabolite levels were unchanged in the presence and absence of the ACEI. Several mechanisms by which angiotensin converting enzyme blockade may cause a decrease in circulating erythropoietin are discussed.